lol conscientious hydropalatical equilibrial mechanisms causes the eradication of semi-porous molecular...im lost.
Printable View
lol conscientious hydropalatical equilibrial mechanisms causes the eradication of semi-porous molecular...im lost.
Quite interesting point of view I thinkQuote:
How we view our relation to these polarities also ultimately determines whether we think of the universe as 'God' or as 'mechanism'; whether we would call ourselves 'spiritual', or 'atheist'. Really, they're two different angles of looking at the exact same thing.
I don't agree with that. I don't understand why you conclude that if we're not the creation of a supernatural god, then we must have come from outside the universe.Quote:
Originally Posted by afghooey
If you follow that line of thought, then you must ask who created the creator, and the creator of the creator, and the creator of the creator of the creator (ad infinitum).
Quote:
Originally Posted by darth stoner
Ah, I think you just misunderstood me. I didn't say we came from outside of the universe. I said that, unless a supernatural God put us here, we came out of the universe from inside.
I couldn't have worded my own views better myself! :rastasmoke:Quote:
Originally Posted by Billy Preston
reaper666 -- an interesting theory, seems very plausible to me, and in fact doesn't seem too far off from the point I made in my (larger) post above... if I'm understanding you correctly, anyway.
Basically, your idea of subconscious is a system that 'handles' the complex reactions between particles which our normal consciousness or 'fuzzy logic' can't percieve, right?
What I was saying was similar, except I don't believe that this system necessarily ends at the boundary of our epidermis. Our body isn't an isolated entity; the energy that constitutes our bodies is constantly interacting with all of the other energy surrounding us. Some of this energy bounces off of us, and some of it passes through us. Either way, according to quantum physics (or at least my limited understanding of it -- if someone can refute this, I'd be glad to hear what they have to say) every interaction of information changes that information. Even our observation of energy can alter it (a huge pain in the ass for quantum physicists, I'm sure). Anyway, what I'm getting at here is that really, the universe is designed to 'handle' interactions with itself, and could therefore (by your definition, if I'm understanding it right) in a way be a subconscious entity in and of itself.
I like that analogy, even if it is a bit oversimplified. :)
Here's a further question to ponder on...
If the 'subconscious' mechanisms that control our bodies are dependent on the regulation of a 'conscious' thermostat (and that thermostat is equally dependent on the mechanisms themselves), could it be possible that there is a similar interdependency between the 'subconscious' mechanisms of the universe and a 'master thermostat'; that is, perhaps a higher level of consciousness?
Mmm, I think I see what you're getting at.
I think I'd have to disagree about life being unnatural, though. IMO, nothing is really unnatural; even those things which we deem to be 'man-made' are just parts of nature that we've manipulated to suit our needs. And as for life being wasteful, I'd have to disagree there too. If energy can't be created or destroyed, then nothing is ever truly wasted because the source is completely inexhaustible.
if the universe cannot be conscious, neither can we be more conscious than something greater than ourselves.
if the universe = god, then we were created by god.
if the universe was created by god, then there is no god.
Ah, makes sense then. The others already said everything (it used to be a non car world and now it has cars etc), I can't think on anything worth adding right now, all the points that needed to be made seem to have been made already.Quote:
Originally Posted by afghooey