Thought you ladies may be interested..

The article said that it would only be a crime if you were deemed healthy and it would be safe to have the child. I take that to mean that if there were a health risk to the mom it would be allowable. I see nothing wrong with this law if it is the case. I think that a trimester is plenty of time to decide even with the month of not knowing. Buy the second trimester you have a little human being in there, no longer an embryo. You should have a choice if you want to be a parent or not but you can abuse your window of oppertunity to decide at the expense of a now devolping person, that's wrong. Be responsible and take enough care of yourself and your body enough to know when an "oops" may have happened to make the responsible decision.

I forgot about that, Chrissy!

But an an embryo feel pain? When the doctor sticks that suction tube in you and the suction is so tremendious that it rips the embryo to shreds including tearing off the arms as well as decapitation.
But killing a child during labor is another by the doctor sticking a scalple into the back of the babies neck severing the brain stem or by snapping the babies neck, because its still not all the way out so its abortion and not murder.
Where is the line?
I say cum is cum and a fetilized egg is a human.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by BabyFacedAbortion

I forgot about that, Chrissy!

---

So does that alter your postion on the subject any differently now?

I'm a new mom any clearly remember the flutters in my belly as my daughter did summer saults inside me, I felt them early easily in the second trimester. Maybe I'm a little swayed by that fact, but I still respect responsible abortion when done promtly.

It does, dear. :)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Gatekeeper777

Where is the line?
I say cum is cum and a fetilized egg is a human.

---

Well that certainly feels nice and arbitrary...

Why don't we say that a human is a human, and a fertilized egg is... an egg?


A fertilized egg doesn't have autonomy, it doesn't even have a spinal cord. Meanwhile, we still test cosmetics on harmless little bunny rabbits, so why so worried about causing pain to embryos?

(and no, they can't feel it.)

A fertililized egg has bbnoth sets of chromisomes (SP).
therefore its a person.

I used to be against this form of abortion. Then I read something a mother wrote. She had invetro and really wanted a baby. During the second trimester they found out it had some really bad disease. I forget what it was but it was something that would have pretty much forced the child to have a very painful and short life. She chose abortion (this was before the law was passed). It really hurt her to make that decision, and it was sure as hell not an opps situation. And she didnt regret her choice later. That changed my mind by opening up my eyes to see past the term they use for second trimester abortions. I think it should be allowed in certain medical situations. I also think this law serves as a stepping stone to further chip away at our rights as women.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Gatekeeper777

A fertililized egg has bbnoth sets of chromisomes (SP).
therefore its a person.

---

Does it pay taxes? Does it have to wait in line at the DMV? Does it need identification? Does it get angry? Fall in love? Does it laugh? Cry? Dream?

No. It's not a person.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Polymirize

Well that certainly feels nice and arbitrary...

Why don't we say that a human is a human, and a fertilized egg is... an egg?


A fertilized egg doesn't have autonomy, it doesn't even have a spinal cord. Meanwhile, we still test cosmetics on harmless little bunny rabbits, so why so worried about causing pain to embryos?

(and no, they can't feel it.)

---

LOL, Jordan fades back, shoots, and THAT'S THE GAME! :jointsmile: