I said I would post pics of my grow with a fucking sign that says whatever you want it to say. Learn to read, and I aced my english classes. I consider myself a pretty good writer, as did my profs.Quote:
Originally Posted by Theduderino
Printable View
I said I would post pics of my grow with a fucking sign that says whatever you want it to say. Learn to read, and I aced my english classes. I consider myself a pretty good writer, as did my profs.Quote:
Originally Posted by Theduderino
Funny, haven't noticed with all your spelling errors :dance: . Well, I'm done with you. You're already buried in cement..Quote:
Originally Posted by tadaa
The Duderino
p.s. Well, at least I got a good laugh. Been a while since I've met someone as stupid as you. Wait, my bad, you're even dumber, HAHAHAHA :dance: !
Do you guys just all have PMS or something?
Tadaa didn't read the footnotes to begin with; therefore he made a few dumb posts. Eventually he provided what looked to be a few study results, so shut up about it. I've said this before but I guess it wasn't read: negative is an opinion; therefore it can't be proven that there are negative side effects of smoking; but obviously there are some effects that people would rather not get, like bronchitis.
Anyone who says there are no negative side effects either loves bronchitis or is a dumbass. Anyone who refuses to read footnotes then refuses to read posts saying to read footnotes is a dumbass. Anyone who demands links incessantly is a dumbass. Anyone who refuses to give any links is a dumbass. Anyone who thinks marijuana is physically addictive (litterally addictive) or thinks marijuana is any more psychologically addictive (the bs addiction) than chocolate is either misinformed or a dumbass, respectively.
Finally, anyone who says the pamphlet would be better if it were less biased... shut the hell up already! I admit it is to an extent biased, but it is no less biased than presenting any random list of facts. Just because it shows both sides of marijuana doesn't make it more biased, even though it looks more pro-legalization, because it is closer to being unbiased. I can understand how simple-minded fools would immediately call it biased because it is much more balanced than what is put out by the Gov't, but I can't understand how an intelligent person could call it more biased just because it also lists the positive things of marijuana.
yes sir, mr eddie sir
Well, I'm gonna play for the other team, for a second, eddie, and say that because our natural melatonin levels are our "rhythm of life", I'd like to hear some input about raising your melatonin levels above your natural peak level, before you reach it at puberty.
That could be the reason why pot is different to different people.
If my posts were going to be graded then maybe I would put more time into making sure everything is spelled correctly:rolleyes:Quote:
Originally Posted by Theduderino
Dude...you flat out used the WRONG word. End of story. Don't make fun or bitch at or belittle someone who claims to have a 4.0 if you don't know the difference between accept and except. That's all I'm saying. So go smoke a bowl or something and take the corncob out.
I agree. Using except instead of accept or the opposite proves you have no understanding of the English language. It's quite sad.
Our president was a C student at Harvard, what's your point? I'm sure mis-using the word except is really going to hurt me financially in the future :rolleyes:Quote:
Originally Posted by eddievanzant
the point is shut up unless you can take it...
you made fun of people for getting a 4.0 and now are saying it doesn't matter?? you're ignorant!!! We're not trying to attack you, you just keep asking for it...