100% Proof About 9/11

for those that don't think the government controls the media:
Bush is straightening up the White House (ie. getting rid of some ppl).. guess who some of his candidates are: a Time Warner Inc. Chairman, and a Morgan Stanley Chief Exec
http://today.reuters.com/news/newsAr..._0_US-BUSH.xml
now stop fucking kidding yourselves

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Tmar.aLL.DaYmar

dear god i should have known that would be completely misunderstood.

And let me start off by saying that YES, i beleive 9/11 was staged. I was the like the fourth fucking post in this thread and i said i beleived it was staged.

And i dont hate people debating 9/11, what i hate is uninformed people spouting off completely ignorant information for both sides. Just because a video online gives some reasons why 9/11 was staged, DOESNT mean that its not fucking lying.

Ive written numerous International Baccalaureate level papers on september eleventh. And ive done something called RESEARCH for PRIMARY SOURCES. ever heard of them? It means not going to google and typing in "9/11 conspiracies", it means interviews with Structural Engineers and other specialists. It means browsing government archives, and other CREDIBLE sources.

---

Again, I could care less about 9/11 conspiracies, so you probably can figure out that I haven't had the honor of doing research for Primary Sources nor written IB level papers on the subject. Congratulations on your accomplishments...

What my point is, is why don't you explain what some of the "ignorant information" that these guys are referring to? Especially since your credentials put in a position of doing just that....A lot of us ignorant posters on this forum don't have the time to go browsing through gov't archives, since that's not our area of work....maybe we'd just rather smoke some weed in our free time. A lot of us uninformed idiots rely on experts like you to do the research and post it online so we can read it, evaluate it, and figure out if we believe it. Just because it's on Google doesn't mean it's NOT true...

In my humble opinion, if I were the expert at something, I would share some of my expert knowledge with the less-enlightened masses, instead of sitting on my IB high horse and spew out stuff like "F this...F that....F you all...Get a F-ing clue."

Again...peace.

http://911research.wtc7.net/cache/wt...neverided.html
^^ is the source, not written by ppl on the site
anyway, it says 200 pieces of a body were linked to one person... can you say EXPLODED... only 300 bodies were found, i didnt realize how fire makes bones evaporate

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by xblackdogx

i didnt realize how fire makes bones evaporate

---

I think they call it cremation.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Psycho4Bud

I think they call it cremation.

---

yes, b/c EVERYONE that died were exposed to "fires" on the first, second, third, fourth, fifth, sixth, seventh, eighth etc floors..... or was it the collapse of the buildings that made the people on these lower floors evaporate?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by xblackdogx

yes, b/c EVERYONE that died were exposed to "fires" on the first, second, third, fourth, fifth, sixth, seventh, eighth etc floors..... or was it the collapse of the buildings that made the people on these lower floors evaporate?

---

How many tons of steel, concrete, etc...dropped on these poor souls? Drop a 100# weight on a grape and see whats left to identify.

ummm, have you picked dead bodies off collapsed buildings before... i'm basing my info on what actual firefighters from the scene said and um... there should have been bodies... flattened bodies if you will... but not dust

OK, this is hopefully going to end all you "i believe the gov't" conspiracists. Fuck outside sources. Here's the blueprints. Look at all of them and think about the 500,000t of steel that comprises the beams. Try to tell me it was a plane that knocked them down.




last picture is FEMA's version... they distorted it to make the beams look like they were independent, but they were all connected

Dickhead Cheney admits USAma had nothing to do with 911...

Q I want to be clear because I've heard you say this, and I've heard the President say it, but I want you to say it for my listeners, which is that the White House has never argued that Saddam was directly involved in September 11th, correct?
THE VICE PRESIDENT: That's correct. We had one report early on from another intelligence service that suggested that the lead hijacker, Mohamed Atta, had met with Iraqi intelligence officials in Prague, Czechoslovakia. And that reporting waxed and waned where the degree of confidence in it, and so forth, has been pretty well knocked down now at this stage, that that meeting ever took place.So we've never made the case, or argued the case that somehow Osama bin Laden [sic] was directly involved in 9/11. That evidence has never been forthcoming. But there -- that's a separate proposition from the question of whether or not there was some kind of a relationship between the Iraqi government, Iraqi intelligence services and the al Qaeda organization
http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/relea...0060329-2.html

^^ Yea, then when Pres Bush gives a speech, most recently as yesterday they always intertwine the events with 9/11 and Iraq.

Check this photos out from AP... this is blatant proof about the Pentagon, and if this is an inside job, then the WTC have to be... they go hand in hand




the hole is roughly 3.5 times the size of the car in the picture :confused: