Torog's Women Thread

Quote:

---

no man has ever spent 18 straight hours getting kicked in the balls

---

Probably not, but you are in pain for way more than 18 hours!!

Quote:

---

no man has ever had to have his abdomen and/or major organs sliced open and sewn shut after getting kicked in the balls;

---

Go look up testicular trauma, ruptured testicles have to be repaired through surgery sometimes multiple surgerys from the testicle not healing right...

Quote:

---

there's no possible way on this earth that getting kicked in the balls is comparable to giving birth.

---

There is no possible way to prove that right or wrong. Trauma to the testicles can cause vomiting and fainting, testicular bleeding, it can cause you to be unable to produce sperm, etc etc so dont act like you can really know, they both sound equally bad

Birth has a purpose, getting kicked in the junk doesnt...

Like i said, giving birth is not a good argument here lady

Quote:

---

i'd like to see you waddle around with 40 extra pounds strapped onto your belly for 9 months

---

id like to see you waddle around with ruptured testicle(s) between your legs

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by C4nn4Bliss

Probably not, but you are in pain for way more than 18 hours!!

---

so is a woman who gives birth. a 2-3 day hospital stay is not the norm for someone who's been kicked in the junk; it IS the norm for a woman who has given birth.

Quote:

---

Go look up testicular trauma, ruptured testicles have to be repaired through surgery sometimes multiple surgerys from the testicle not healing right...

---

while i do concede that being kicked CAN result in surgery, the vast majority of kicks in the balls do not necessitate surgery.

Quote:

---

There is no possible way to prove that right or wrong. Trauma to the testicles can cause vomiting and fainting, testicular bleeding, it can cause you to be unable to produce sperm, etc etc so dont act like you can really know, they both sound equally bad

---

vomiting and fainting and whatnot are unpleasant, sure. but i've yet to see a death caused by ball-kicking.

Quote:

---

Birth has a purpose, getting kicked in the junk doesnt...

---

like i said, giving birth is not comparable to being kicked.

Quote:

---

Like i said, giving birth is not a good argument here lady

---

"not a good argument" for what? i was simply arguing the point that getting kicked and giving birth are not comparable. apples and oranges. i'm not the one who initially compared them.

90% of kicks to the groin are painful but essentially harmless, and can be dealt with at home with an ice pack. the same cannot be said for giving birth.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by eddievanzant

Haha I don't think so. It's a great idea to carry a weapon and at first seems like a smart thing to do, but reconsider: How could you possibly defend yourself with a bootknife?
"Hold on a minute before you try to rape me." *bends down and takes 20 second to get the knife out* "Okay go."
The best thing you could do is one, carry a small gun in your purse or two, shove sand in your vagina like the Native Americans.

---

I can take my knife out in like 1 second. Believe me, if I somehow was in that kind of situation, I would have my knife out before a motherfucker could even touch me. You have no idea.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by C4nn4Bliss

id like to see you waddle around with ruptured testicle(s) between your legs

---

when you take a quote out of context, the meaning changes.

i said "after you've done that, maybe you can make a ball-kicking comparison that might be taken seriously"

my point, is that until someone has both given birth AND been kicked in the testicles, which is physically imposslbe, they cannot try and say that the two are comparable.

That's not true. You can't say 90% because you don't know. If by harmless you mean resulting in complications, then neither does giving birth. You ARE trying to compare the two by saying giving birth is worse. It is a bad argument because men don't know what they're talking about and neither do you. There's no way for you to gain an advantage because regardless of giving birth being a choice (situationally; not as a gender) and that doctors encourage women to take painkillers (kick-in-nuts is too spontaneous for someone to say "Here take these"), neither side knows what they're talking about. Also, the thing about dragging a woman through the common, YOU are the one pointing out she's a woman. As long as he would've done the same thing to a man (he probably would've done worse) you should have no problem with it.

We could go in circles but i do not wish to do that...

You say that they arent compareable but you still provide your so called "facts" about childbirth for comparison.....

You contradict yourself almost as if it were on purpose....

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by eddievanzant

That's not true. You can't say 90% because you don't know. If by harmless you mean resulting in complications, then neither does giving birth. You ARE trying to compare the two by saying giving birth is worse. It is a bad argument because men don't know what they're talking about and neither do you. There's no way for you to gain an advantage because regardless of giving birth being a choice (situationally; not as a gender) and that doctors encourage women to take painkillers (kick-in-nuts is too spontaneous for someone to say "Here take these"), neither side knows what they're talking about. Also, the thing about dragging a woman through the common, YOU are the one pointing out she's a woman. As long as he would've done the same thing to a man (he probably would've done worse) you should have no problem with it.

---

until someone has both given birth AND been kicked in the testicles, which is physically imposslbe, they cannot try and say that the two are comparable -- not if they expect to be taken seriously.

by harmless i mean necessitating medical care.

the spontenaity of a kick to the balls doesnt change the fact that if it's not painful enough for you to go to the hospital, which it generally isnt, i cant logically see it being compared to giving birth.

a person *tried* to kick him -- did not actually succeed -- and then fell on their ass. i dont care whether it was a man or a woman, the fact that the person did not injure anyone means to me that dragging them through the mud is exremely petty and outrageous. not to mention completely immature. why not be the bigger 'man' and walk away? clearly someone who's flipping out about a lighter and falling on their ass is not in their right mind; ie there is something wrong with them, or they are intoxicated. there was absolutely no need to drag anyone through the mud.

Up until the last century, nearly all births were performed outside a hospital, so I wouldn't say cchildbirth is that much more harmful. As long as you think it's petty regardless of that person being a woman, I have no problem with your opinion.

Quote:

---

they cannot try and say that the two are comparable -- not if they expect to be taken seriously.

---

So you made your posts with the expectation of not being taken seriously.....presenting facts about both is infact comparision....

Quote:

---

a kick to the balls doesnt change the fact that if it's not painful enough for you to go to the hospital, which it generally isnt, i cant logically see it being compared to giving birth.

---

Once again you are comparing.....