Printable View
actually yeah, asthetically speaking the ps3 looks like a giant 80's toaster, but then again playstations have always been sorta ugly.
the xbox looks average, not ugly but not great either
the revolution is the best looking of the lot, in my opinion it looks slick
so if gaming was a fashion statement, the rev would look the nicest beside my imaginary flatscreen tv
props!!!Quote:
Originally Posted by God v2.0
That doesn't end anything. Compare Halo to any real FPS made for PC and it's mediocre. For 6th gen console games, I guess you're right. Though I find the game to be boring stupid and no less difficult to control than any other console shooter, it's a very popular series (maybe because Xbox had no other games that weren't totally sucky). If you think it will still be the best for the 7th gen consoles, you're wrong. The Nintendo Revo will be the first console to have a controller that can handle a FPS without auto-aim. You wanna know who the people leading the scoreboards on xbox live on halo? They're the people who've connected Mice and Keyboards to their Xbox because the controller isn't accurate. So here's three words to end this specific argument:Quote:
Originally Posted by higher4hockey
Halo is mediocre.
in terms of fps and also rts pc owns all, thats a fact
but as pc gaming declines i think its good that they are trying to bring 2 of the best gaming genres to the console market
halo was mediocre by pc fps standards but amazing by console standards, i think the revolution will really do the genre justice
rts has never really found a big following, but with the advent of proper online console gaming i see no reason why it wont take off