Science Disproves Evolution
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pahu78
Do you know for a fact that the Bible was authored by men rather than God? If so, can you produce evidence supporting that fact?
Lets turn the table (from your list):
2. The universe had a beginning.
I challenge you to produce evidence supporting this fact
3. Before the beginning of the universe, there was no universe.
I challenge you to produce evidence supporting this fact
4. Since there was no universe, there was nothing.
I challenge you to produce evidence supporting this fact
5. Since the universe does exist, it came from nothing.
I challenge you to produce evidence supporting this fact
Science Disproves Evolution
WOW - this thread still lives!
More copy-pasting than you can shake a stick at :wtf:
Let's get at least one thing straight:
The theory of Evolution has nothing to do with the Big Bang, nothing to do with the formation of the sun or planets and nothing to do with the existance or lack thereof of a first cause. The theory of Evolution doesn't even deal with how life on Earth got started.
The only thing that is examined and explained by the theory of Evolution is how life on Earth developed after life began.
I'm still waiting to see how Science disproves evolution - so far this thread is full of fail.
Science Disproves Evolution
Pahu is literally spamming the whole web with this BS:
Check this Google search
"pahu science disproves evolution"
Isn't this enough to get banned here? Or at least moved to the conspiracy forum :D j/k
Science Disproves Evolution
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ubalubus
Lets turn the table (from your list):
2. The universe had a beginning.
I challenge you to produce evidence supporting this fact
3. Before the beginning of the universe, there was no universe.
I challenge you to produce evidence supporting this fact
4. Since there was no universe, there was nothing.
I challenge you to produce evidence supporting this fact
5. Since the universe does exist, it came from nothing.
I challenge you to produce evidence supporting this fact
You failed to answer my question. As to your challenges, all the facts are self evident. Can you think of anything in the universe that had no beginning? The definition of universe is everything that exists. Before everything existed, did it exist? If it did not exist, wouldn't there be nothing? Since the universe does exist, and it appeared from nothing, and there is no natural cause, then isn't it logical to conclude the cause of the universe is supernatural?
Aren't your challenges really an attempt to explain away your inability or unwillingness to accept facts that threaten what you want to believe?
Science Disproves Evolution
Quote:
Originally Posted by Delta9 UK
WOW - this thread still lives!
More copy-pasting than you can shake a stick at :wtf:
Let's get at least one thing straight:
The theory of Evolution has nothing to do with the Big Bang, nothing to do with the formation of the sun or planets and nothing to do with the existance or lack thereof of a first cause. The theory of Evolution doesn't even deal with how life on Earth got started.
The only thing that is examined and explained by the theory of Evolution is how life on Earth developed after life began.
I'm still waiting to see how Science disproves evolution - so far this thread is full of fail.
You are referring to biological evolution. Do you disagree that the universe evolved from a Big Bang as many scientists believe?
Do you question the belief that evolution starts with a single cell that had no beginning?
Do believe everything that exists was created from nothing? If so, we agree!
Science Disproves Evolution
Quote:
Originally Posted by Delta9 UK
Pahu is literally spamming the whole web with this BS:
Check this Google search
"pahu science disproves evolution"
Isn't this enough to get banned here? Or at least moved to the conspiracy forum :D j/k
Doe BS mean Beautiful Science? As to your suggestion I should be banned for sharing my understanding of reality (which, by the way, is what you are also doing), I am not interested in entering into endless quibbling over the information I am sharing because I believe the information speaks for itself. If you disagree, that ??s fine. I believe the free exchange of facts is a healthy, profitable way to discover truth, but your disagreement is with the scientists being quoted, not me.
The mentality of unredeemed human nature has remained unchanged since Cain murdered Abel over a disagreement. History is full of examples of people silencing those with whom they disagree:
Shadrach, Meshach, and Abednego were thrown into the fiery furnace because they refused to worship the king??s idol.
Daniel was thrown into the lion??s den for worshipping God, contrary to the king??s decree.
Jesus was crucified because the religious authorities disagreed with Him.
His disciples were tortured and murdered because the authorities disagreed with them.
Thousands were murdered for disagreeing with the Roman Catholic church during the inquisition.
Hitler murdered six million Jews and seven million Christians because he disagreed with them.
Over 100,000,000 people have been murdered under atheist communism for disagreeing with them.
Muslims murder anyone who disagrees with them.
So you are definitely in the majority when you want to silence me because you disagree with the facts I am sharing that challenge your worldview.
The refusal to believe facts in this and other instances may run deeper than just simple fear, hatred or partisanship. Perhaps some people invest so much of themselves into a certain political, religious, philosophical or scientific viewpoint, that their identity and sense of self becomes bonded to it. The bond is so strong that any fact that disproves even a small part of their particular viewpoint is interpreted as a direct attack upon their own self-identity. This can lead to retaliation in the form of wild accusations or character attacks upon the people promoting such facts (I.E. stop the message by killing the messenger).
If this is true, then you can probably never prove any disagreeable facts to such people. They??ve traded introspection and reason for the security, comfort, and certainty that their viewpoints, and thus their identity, are always 100 percent correct.
Science Disproves Evolution
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pahu78
You failed to answer my question.
as you did mine...
Science Disproves Evolution
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pahu78
Shadrach, Meshach, and Abednego were thrown into the fiery furnace because they refused to worship the king??s idol.
Daniel was thrown into the lion??s den for worshipping God, contrary to the king??s decree.
Jesus was crucified because the religious authorities disagreed with Him.
His disciples were tortured and murdered because the authorities disagreed with them.
Thousands were murdered for disagreeing with the Roman Catholic church during the inquisition.
Hitler murdered six million Jews and seven million Christians because he disagreed with them.
Over 100,000,000 people have been murdered under atheist communism for disagreeing with them.
Muslims murder anyone who disagrees with them.
Religion is an evil invention of man to perverse and twist the beauty and pureness of spirituality to benefit himself both in wealth, power and ego.
Science Disproves Evolution
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ubalubus
Religion is an evil invention of man to perverse and twist the beauty and pureness of spirituality to benefit himself both in wealth, power and ego.
Why do you believe that?
Science Disproves Evolution
[align=center]
Fossil Gaps
[/align]
If evolution happened, the fossil record should show continuous and gradual changes from the bottom to the top layers. Actually, many gaps or discontinuities appear throughout the fossil record (a).
a. ??But, as by this theory innumerable transitional forms must have existed, why do we not find them imbedded in countless numbers in the crust of the earth?? Darwin, The Origin of Species, p. 163.
??...the number of intermediate varieties, which have formerly existed [must] truly be enormous. Why then is not every geological formation and every stratum full of such intermediate links? Geology assuredly does not reveal any such finely-graduated organic chain; and this, perhaps, is the most obvious and serious objection which can be urged against the theory [of evolution].? Ibid., p. 323.
Darwin then explained that he thought that these gaps existed because of the ??imperfection of the geologic record.? Early Darwinians expected the gaps would be filled as fossil exploration continued. Most paleontologists now agree that this expectation has not been fulfilled.
In the Beginning: Compelling Evidence for Creation and the Flood - 23. Fossil Gaps
