My store says it's fine, but they arn't allways giving the best advice. I will look up a stor though like you said and give it a try. Better Grow usually has some good stuff, hopefully their info is as good as their products.
Adieu
Printable View
My store says it's fine, but they arn't allways giving the best advice. I will look up a stor though like you said and give it a try. Better Grow usually has some good stuff, hopefully their info is as good as their products.
Adieu
here you go...calcium and magnesium is what determines the hardness of water. Water hardness is detemined by mg of cal/mag per liter
So it has been determined that "hard water" with 100-150 mg of calcium per liter would be great for mmj. below 50 mg per liter is considered "soft water".
There you go. Now find the mg per liter of your water and that will let you know where you stand on the hardness of your water
hey bear ,
w/ G/H 3 part they don't even recomend H/W micro unless ppm. out of the tap is over 200 ppm . ours is only 80ppm. here , 130 ppm. doesnt sound all to bad . if it aint broke don't fix it ? let us know what all you learn on this matter . i saw your other thread n looks like your headed towards a r/o sys .
i hear ya w/ no pups in near future , lotsa work , like 8-10 new kids all at once . lol . much respect back at ya bear . yes this has been much help in my recovery , not just the med. aspect of it , but the theraputic side of it also .
thanx all for anny blessings.
peace
your cuz
crispi
My well water is about 160-180 ppm which isn't bad...in fact my hydro dude recommended trying it before buying an RO system...the problem was in the fluctuating ph that I never could control for very long without the RO water....worth every pennny to me for that reason alone:)
And bear....you can bet your ass I wouldn't cry if I had a nice Trans Am either....;)
that's exactly what I experienced from my well water...great water, but caused the ph to fluctuate consistantly...peace:smokin:Quote:
Originally Posted by Weedhound
bear didn't mention any p/h flux. tho guys ?
he just asked if water was too hard to obtain max results using g/h 3 part nutes .
peace
crispi
yeah and I answered that, but another member jumped the thread...what's the big deal???I think everybody got answered...
We're all good, I like all of the info always, sometimes that extra input shines a light on other factors that may not have been taken into consideration, and who know's who else is reading threw the thread and something clicks for him or her and solves a problem that they may have been dealing with and just couldn't begin to figure it out or where to start.
Adieu
True true, lots of times it's the details that make the difference in the end...and it's usually something I didn't consider until it is pointed out by someone else. Ps X.....like that dog there and latewood's got a new avatar too.....