ok so nerves wouldnt come back but it does increase sensitivity again? (do correct me if im wrong)
hmm interusting
id maybe do it but i dunno if being younger casues problems with it....
Printable View
ok so nerves wouldnt come back but it does increase sensitivity again? (do correct me if im wrong)
hmm interusting
id maybe do it but i dunno if being younger casues problems with it....
Well, Breuk or a reconstructive expert would have to give you the real answer here. I really don't know. I would think different people might have different results.
Seems to me like the thing to keep in miind is that sensation adjusts quickly after circumcision, practically in babyhood, and men who've been circumcized are just as able to experience great sexual pleasure. It's just that the quality of sensations may be different than that of uncut guys.
My husband just said that since one cut guy can't really know how the experience of an uncut penis truly feels, what's to worry about? "Guys will forever be telling each other that one status (cut vs. uncut) is better than the other, but they can't really know unless they were circumcized in adulthood and had something to compare it to for themselves. The 'My way feels better' claim is just another way of trying to hang dick power over another dude." He may be onto something there. That being said, he's been cut himself, and he still felt strongly, as did I, that we shouldn't circumcize our son when he was a baby.
One guy that was cut as an adult said his pleasure went from a "10", uncut, down to a "3" after the operation. There are similar stories documented. I would guess that adult guys who do it for religious reasons aren't going to be completely honest. Likewise, if somebody was convinced to get one for medical purposes, whether the advice was sound or not, they may accept whatever the side effects are without complaining - especially if there was a threat of cancer.Quote:
Originally Posted by birdgirl73
The circumcision causes more problems as the men get older - more rubbing which causes desensitization, added troubles due to less testosterone (both cut and uncut men), etc.
I don't think that there are too many guys that are uncut that claim to have superior sexual prowess to the circumcised men.
The foreskin contains the greatest amount of sensitive nerve endings in the male body, and I find it impossible to believe that the removal of them is going to result in an organ that is equal to the way it would have been without the circumcision.
Well, I am glad to see that many parents are sparing their son(s) the knife.
It'd be interesting to do a study of guys, say men who convert to Judaism and have to be circumcized in adulthood, and get their real experiences. You're probably right that many wouldn't be completely candid.
So I have a question base on one thing you said up there. Does the foreskin play a role in testosterone levels/production? Oh, duh, no, I realize you were talking about the lower testosterone levels as men age causing problems either way.
you guys that are snipped dont understand my tip is so sensitive when you pull back the foreskin i prolly enjoy blowjobs more than you :)
Thankyou, your not as bad as i thought.Quote:
Originally Posted by rajking86
meh its not worth it
it sounds wierd too.. I wonder wut the "device" looks likeQuote:
Originally Posted by shoi
This is a foreskin restorer.
ouch that looks painful.....