you did good im with u man if somone took my little cuz or somthing i would go out poppin heads with a rifle or somthing i need time to think about it but u get the point i no he didnt take the chick but good job! he deserves to get his ass kicked
Printable View
you did good im with u man if somone took my little cuz or somthing i would go out poppin heads with a rifle or somthing i need time to think about it but u get the point i no he didnt take the chick but good job! he deserves to get his ass kicked
Afterall, TonyD would never, ever, have non-consensual sex with a 6 year old.Quote:
Originally Posted by TonyD
or something like that... what a great thread.
I personally would have beat the shit out of him 1 on 1 but fuck it... he deserved what he got...
I agree completely with what you did because it needed to be done.Bashed him?why didnt you kill him?i know the effects of rape almost first hand as my girlfriend was raped for 3 years by her older brother.and all of you who said what this guy did was wrong, deserve to be bashed along side with this child rapist or put in a fucking cell.Rape on an adult is one thing, but when i child is raped it leaves scars that will never go away.
So to all those in this thread who said what he did was wrong?You tell me what you feel like doing the day you get tied down and raped by an old man.
Go NightFox i hope you crippled the fucking bastard.
as opposed to the adult just forgetting it happened?Quote:
Rape on an adult is one thing, but when i child is raped it leaves scars that will never go away.
for the last fuckin time cuz i'm tired of repeating myself, i never said he shouldn't get his ass kicked or whatever you want to do, but don't be a pussy about it, fight one on one... or do whatever by yourself, if you aren't ballsy enough to do it by yourself, then don't fuckin do it...
i wasnt talking about you really, mainly the ones who were completely against it.
but i still disagree, that man had spent half his life taking advantage of little girls.That rapist knew the girls could do nothing to stop him and that they were completely defenceless, so i think its only serving justice to put him in the same situation.If one person were to take him on he would have felt hardly any fear and probably would have won the fight, am i right??Thats not fucking justice.
What has this come to?
Either we don't think violence is a good thing, and therefore are magically in support of child molestation...
Or we're disgusted by child molestation and think violence will solve all problems.
Anyone else see the misrepresentation in these views?
Apparently I need to say it: I am disgusted by molestation. It's a horrible thing and only made more tragic by the extent to which it happens in society. And yet, at the exact same time, I am also disgusted by violence. which is a horrible thing and only made more tragic by how widespread it is. Molestation is at its essense an act of violence, the same as rape, the same as murder.
I don't understand how some of us here seem to feel that violence justifies further violence. Please, explain...
To be honest i never thought of it in that way.I also respect your views.
But i cant help but see things the way i see them.
Im not disgusted by violence at all and it makes me feel better knowing there are people out there that will not just lay down to be walked on, but instead will stand up and fight for what they think is right.
Most likely NightFox heard that there was a pedophile in his neighborhood and was looking for or made up an excuse to kick his ass. He obviously enjoyed it if he smoked a bowl over the guy. A convicted child molester isn't going to pick up little 7 y.o. girls in public after being paroled.
YOU ARE HYPOCRITICALLY THINKING WITH THE SAME FORCE FED STIGMA THAT WE STONERS DEAL WITH EVERYDAY.
(ever notice just how many episodes of Law & Order involve the cop beating down a child molester who vows he will continue molesting every child he sees)
ok maybe i should take the time to point this out...violence, and defending yoruself are two way diffrent things... defending thyself means when cornered or otherwise threatened you will fight back, even to extreme and deadly outcomes.. violence on the other hand, is more of a seeking out a fight, and trying to find any and all reasons to start shit with anyone as long as it ends in a fight... atleast that's my interprutation of violence/defense...Quote:
Originally Posted by Darchy250
as for the post that he wouldnt' of felt threatened/and probably would have won.. the guy that was involved in the beating, and posted here made a point of pointing out how small he was, and besides that, like i said before if you're not man/tough enough to do it yourself, don't do it... you should never get "in water over your head" so to speak, and that goes for more that fighting, an old time jailhouse saying "if you don't wanna do the time, don't do the crime" also, if you were just "minding your own buisness" so to speak (this part is sketchy/unclear) and someone just came up to you and started kicking the shit out of you, would be calm? would you just be like "wtf?" or would you feel threatened?