me here too...
Printable View
me here too...
:wtf:Quote:
Originally Posted by CBDTHCCBN
Me here too...Quote:
Originally Posted by SnSstealth
Many thank's for the reply SnSstealth,
Well as you are a man of more experience than i, will nail some of mine and see what happens.
Keep the faith and good luck in all you do.:thumbsup:
I agree with the ideas that "spiking" your plants in the last 3 or 4 days would increase resin production. It is proven that stressing your plants produces more resin, but it typically reduces the overall harvest weight. If you "spike" them a few days before harvest, you're not sacrificing any weight (the buds are already full grown) but you are inducing the plant to produce more resin.
As far as icing the roots goes, i believe that the liquid in the roots might be pushed into the plant, but the truth is that the roots don't have any THC in them. It might increase your harvest weight a little bit, but it's not going to make your buds any more potent.
Hey guys, i had a question in my outdoor thread about when to top and no one seems to be hitting my post. Could one of you experts plz check that out for me and let me know what's up?
link me.Quote:
Originally Posted by dgsgandalf
Actually two plants are exactly the same if they are clones from the same mother. There are many things that can affect the development of identical clones however. That's why the scientific community usually recommends that for horticultural comparisons to be accurate you need about 50 identical clones in each group. Some say 20 would do but that's about the bare minimum. There is a possibility of too many variations within specific plants and other conditions, for tests with less plants to be taken seriously. This makes sense to me, so when someone tells me they've done a side by side study with a total of 8 plants or something I keep my ears open but remain a little skeptical.Quote:
Originally Posted by Greenthing
So there are two ways I will tend to find likely something that makes no sense. One way is by competent scientific comparisons, and the other is by pertinent perceived experiences. A personal experience cannot be wrong, so if someone tells me he's worked with a strain for years, then tried something different that produced different results, I have to believe them until I see reason not to.
[quote=Opie Yutts]Actually two plants are exactly the same if they are clones from the same mother. There are many things that can affect the development of identical clones however. That's why the scientific community usually recommends that for horticultural comparisons to be accurate you need about 50 identical clones in each group. Some say 20 would do but that's about the bare minimum.Hi Opie Yutts, thats what i was trying to say in my post but you have put the point across so much better than i have.Quote:
There is a possibility of too many variations within specific plants and other conditions, for tests with less plants to be taken seriously.
I have read a lot of your posts and you do seem to have a way with words Cheers.:thumbsup:
thanks opie!!!Quote:
Originally Posted by Opie Yutts
WT
UUUUHUUHHHHHHUUUUHU???????? High, How is the Weather???????
Ya'll Have Done a GREAT JOB, :jointsmile::jointsmile:I Don't Give a Fuck What the Hater's Say,:thumbsup::thumbsup: They can smell the Smoke when Ya'll Blaze The Killer:stoned::stoned::stoned:
I think I Read???? Ya'll Used LED'S In Her?????HAHAHAHAHAHA
:pimp::pimp::pimp: