http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/lost_in_translation/Quote:
Originally Posted by psychocat
I guess you're right...
Printable View
http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/lost_in_translation/Quote:
Originally Posted by psychocat
I guess you're right...
Just because rottentomatoes likes it doens't mean shit. Last time I checked, they didn't think office space was worth much. I don't put much faith in what I'm told I'm supposed to like.
Silent Hill was unwatchable...
I hate all that rating shit. It's bullshit (not directed at you Jedi)...it's just that site's opinion. Just like with all movie critics. Just like with us...it's all opinion..just because someone gives a movie a 20...it could be a 90 in someone else's book...or vice versa. It really isn't relevant if you ask me. If one likes a film...one likes a film...that's it. Just like with music.
strange brew..... however it launched the two main actor's careers.
I couldn't have said it better.Quote:
Originally Posted by MacWQ33
Ah man, I liked the glass house =\ It was ok.Quote:
Originally Posted by crudemood
I'd have to say the matrix movies, except for the first one. Which I did like. The rest are trashola.
Scarface was kinda shitty. It's way to over rated. But it's still ok.
Species sucked.
Men in black.
Eragon was a horribley terrible movie. And I saw it baked too, and it was still awful!
Gili is the worst movie, and embarrassed to even mention it
For those of you bashing rotten tomatoes, you need to click on a link before you bash it. Rotten tomatoes doesn't just give a rating, they take many, many critics ratings and combine them together to give a score. They also do the same with users. (By the way benagain 78% of critics and 94% of rt users gave Office Space a good rating, so maybe you better check again).
Yes, you can say, "I don't care what critics think! If I like a movie its good!! If I don't, it's crap!"
Well, that may be your philosophy, but it is in no way a method of deriving a film's merit. I'm sure some people think Heidi Klum or George Clooney are ugly people. That doesn't mean they are. A concensus needs to be reached on a film to determine whether its good and bad. And the vast majority of critics (people who love and have studied film, and are therefore more qualified to determine a film's merits in at least its technical sense) gave Lost in Translation a positive rating. Therefore, it is a good film. Whether one individual thinks it reeks doesn't matter. The concensus is it is a good film, so one's listing it as a "worst film ever" can hardly be justified.