Printable View
Like I stated...these people are definately no Alex Jones!
The authors acknowledge the assistance of Jeremy Bernier and Marco Fontecchio in preparing this information.
J.R. Barnett is a professor of fire protection engineering, and R.R. Biederman and R.D. Sisson, Jr. are professors of materials science and engineering, at Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, Massachusetts, 01609.
please, come on bro, you are smarter than thatQuote:
Originally Posted by Psycho4Bud
WTC 4,5 were extremely damaged by the collapse of WTC 1 and 2.... WTC 7 had no damage even comparable to 4 and 5 and yet it fell due to "small fires in select portions of the building"
you truly scare me psycho
and could you answer one thing: i thought the gov't drug tested their employees..
Come on now! Like I told the jailer when I took my piss test for hubor privilage..."after 30 years of tokin' do ya really think it's going to be clean"?Quote:
Originally Posted by xblackdogx
Did you read the analysis?
I spent many a day in the upper floors of Two World Trade Center. When there was wind, the building swayed - it was unnerving at first, especially while in an elevators. There were two elevator banks - one was a group that went up to about the 45th floor, and another that you had to change over to to go the rest of the way up.
If a little WIND could move those buildings and many other lesser ones, what the hell do you think an airliner could do if it hit it? It would seriously destabilize the structure, that's what - and that's why it was built to collapse straight down. An architect told me on 9/11, on the subway, that they would collapse from the impact and fires, and they did.
Seven World Trade Center is the object of many law suits and investigations. More of the story of it's destruction is forthcoming. There are so many companies and government agencies involved it could take forever, but that's the way the courts work.
i have read parts of the 9/11 commission report and found major contradictions, specifically in Flight 77... i can't read all 80 pages, but ill look skim it over and see if what you're saying could apply
It's bullshit and you fucken know it!!! That building was not on fire and it was DELIBERATLY planned and detonated before the attacks took place, as was the WTC buildings themselves!! God how blind are people sometimes?!Quote:
Originally Posted by Psycho4Bud
Damn Amerikan Nazis. I already have my list of NSA scum agents on these boards.
Does anyone else agree with this person that it was "damaged" by WTC Buildings 1 or 2, or it was deliberatly detonated? Funny how it took them just over an hour or 2 to set up detonators to "pull it" so suddenly. I mean...did some joe blo guy just stick detonators anywhere? I really dont't think thats legal. lol.
YOU"RE FUCKED BUDDY!!! :thumbsup:
And Psycho...if you'll remember to put those new cover sheets on your NSA reports, that'll be great....mmk!!! Oh by the way...did you get that memo?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Great Spirit
Very compelling arguement! HMMMMM....to bad you couldn't have supplied a few supporting links to that. Oh well.......
Keep up the good work!:thumbsup:
Nazism at its finest huh! There is no way in hell Building 7 could have been damaged enough by the WTC attacks and warrant a demolition. You do realize that it takes months of planning to do a demolition right?? So why all of a sudden do they "pull" it?Quote:
Originally Posted by Psycho4Bud
Inquiring minds want to know!!!
Why hello, you like to ask questions concerning pictures so I looked up something special just for you.....since you bring up the "Nazi" thing, can you expain the similarities of the pics below and also, what's your opinion on pic #1?Quote:
Originally Posted by Great Spirit
Have a good one!:thumbsup:
BACK TO THE TOPIC:
http://www.unknownnews.org/060214a-Barrett.html
head of Duke Univesity's religous studies department has anazlyzed and translated all the bin Laden tapes, look at his discoveries.