Ok lets say the government did stage the attacks. I just want to know what their motive was if they did. What good reason would the government have for staging 9/11?
Printable View
Ok lets say the government did stage the attacks. I just want to know what their motive was if they did. What good reason would the government have for staging 9/11?
This answers your question too, PeteRock. However, before you read this, read my last posts for the "full story".Quote:
Originally Posted by Oneironaut
Bush didn't orchestrate the attacks. Someone much more powerful than Bush did? Much more powerful than Bush you say. Of course.
Just look at his face when he heard about the planes crashing into the building. It's like a monkey who just found out his favorite tree got knocked down. He's not smart enough to plan the attack, nor is he smart enough to cover it up. Somebody, somewhere, wanted something.
I get your point, really I do. For a while I tried to convince myself that it wasn't the government either, since it does seem really crazy to say it was. There's a lot of things more powerful than the government, though, which brings me back to Big Business. We haven't had another attack since then, even though we bombed the hell outta two countries, we've been kept in a state of constant fear with the terror alert system, our basic freedoms are being taken away by something labeled a "Patriot" Act, I mean the list just goes on and on. Sure, they could have seen 9/11 as an opportunity to take away our basic freedoms, but it's just more plausible to me that it was planned.
hmm.. motives... they as top officials have goals for our country... one major goal is to be a superpower, especially militarily. Their ideas aren't supported by all, so this is basically sythetic terrorism which caused fear upon the nation. with doing so, we will be more acceptable of their plans (stated in The Project for New American Century) and also pass stuff like the Patriot Act (gives them an enormous amount of power, and eliminates the checks and balance system we are based on, especially when dealing with persecuting detainees of wartime)Quote:
Originally Posted by Pete Rock
the link to new american century is in a post above
true. also you can tell a professional inside job bombing from an amateur bombing. amateur bombings always bomb something little like a bus and there is no evidence as opposed to a prof. inside bombing where the fbi always finds all these pieces of evidence. basically amateur bombings are always sloppy.Quote:
Originally Posted by graph
Maybe, just maybe, the force of the Twin Towers collapsing onto a concrete floor made the surrounding area shake just a little, so that surrounding buildings were damaged or destroyed?Quote:
Originally Posted by Yous
I really dont know what the fuss is about. Sure, the 9/11 and 7/7 bombings might be inside jobs, but will getting rid of the current government make all these problems disappear? For a few years, maybe. But then another government is gonna come into power, and someone inside will be corrupt, and the same things will happen again.
Just fuck it. If its gonna happen, its gonna happen, and theres not a damn thing we can do about it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Swizzy89304
owner of WTC7 admitted it was "pulled" on PBS or another station
by the way....great additude :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :error:
basically your saying to just bend over....:thumbsup:
g*d damnit everyone quit being so fucking retarded. The pointless shit thats being said from both sides of this debate is so g*ddamn ignorant i want to fucking kill myself.
As for people who think that the US Government wouldnt kill their own citizens for a political, economical or financial advantages get your fucking head out of your ass. This isnt a fucking disney movie for christ sakes. I would give some examples, but if your really disillusioned enough to think that our country is lead by morality instead of greed then theres no fucking point.
And as for all you people who watch "loose change" and think your an expert on 9/11, do your own g*ddamn research. holy fuck your no better than the people who blindly listen to the government. Ive seen alot of stupidass conspiracy theories which can easily be proven wrong.
OK FINE! steal beams melt at fuckedy-ass degrees, and jet fuel burns at a lower temperature. well did you ever think that a steal beam doesnt have to fucking melt in order for thousands of pounds of concrete to cause it to break? At jet fuel's max temp, a steal beam loses 70% of its integrity. Does that sound probable now?
sick of these clone threads..
Then go ahead and prove this entire theory wrong......more than just the "steal" beams and 70% stuff that you mentioned....Quote:
Originally Posted by Tmar.aLL.DaYmar
Or, maybe this isn't one of those "stupidass conspiracy" theories, after all. :rasta:
What is it about this thread that you hate so much? That the people referring to "Loose Change" pretend to be experts? Or that you just don't believe how strong steel is?
I admit, I think a lot of the conspiracies I've read are complete BS...but there are also some things that make you wonder. And, there are a lot of FACTS that these conspiracies are based on that have yet to be disputed. If everything happened like you think it did, why are there these holes?And if the government knows that all of these holes exist, why don't they fill in these holes and answer the questions that they know are being asked?
I, personally don't have any stance about this 9/11 stuff, but don't hate on these dudes for having theirs. That's the whole reason we're supposedly fighting this war, right? America would be a sh!tty place if everyone was lazy, didn't question anything, and simply said stuff like "fuck it, there's no point" or "if it's gonna happen, it's gonna happen."
Peace.
I guess you'd better go kill yourself because this debate aint going away, just like the debate about whether God exists and whether there was a big bang or evolution. Get over it! :thumbsup:Quote:
Originally Posted by Tmar.aLL.DaYmar
The way you put it, does make it PROBABLE that the steal beam losess 70% of its intergrity but: if you watch the crashes, collapses you can barely see any fires, given there are alot of fires in the building but not as much to make it lose 70 % of its integrity.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tmar.aLL.DaYmar
Below is a picture that shows a building losing its integrity due to fire. The WTC only stood after impact for under 1hr 20 min :confused: The picture below is around 10 hours!