wow man.... there's something you either should or shouldn't be taking.Quote:
Originally Posted by Musician
Printable View
wow man.... there's something you either should or shouldn't be taking.Quote:
Originally Posted by Musician
nice try man but im not one to kiss and tell
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kurupt3Z3
agreed
As Darwins rotweiler recently quoted, there are evil people doign eveil things, and good people doing good things. Only with relegion do you have good people doing evil things
Why do you think that? Just curious.Quote:
Originally Posted by Funken Monken
I'm quoting, not necessarily thinking, but I think its a very accuate statement. And I wont attribute it to any 1 relegion or to its followers; I think its relevant to any relegion. The best example I can muster (off the top of my head, but rest assured its real) is the guy who was a fundamentalist christian who, acting on the word of his god, shot a Doctor because he worked at a clinic that conducted early term terminations. A doctor with a family and kids. Because of a belief a good man did evil, because he though it was good . You could I suppose extend that to suicide bombers as well, or anyone who will kill for a belief system.Quote:
Originally Posted by Shelbay
But basically, wrong done under pretense.
You say science is your belief because it shows you facts....
science doesn't proove anything....The problem with 'proof', of course, is that it connotes certainty and completion. But scientific inquiry is never completed, and nor are its verdicts infallible. Nothing is set in stone or held to be beyond question. So, we might think, nothing is ever "proved".
Should we say that proof is merely "evidence so strong that it would be unreasonable to deny the supported conclusion"? Well, that's not quite good enough, for that would allow us to prove things that are actually (if surprisingly) false. So, as for knowledge, we must supplement the justification requirement with a truth requirement. If the conclusion is not true, then it cannot be known or proved.
.....I can't really be bothered to go on...you get the idea...There is no proof of anything scientific/religious they just present ideas that support their hypothesis...
I can't prove that God or something like Him or She or It doesn't exist some where (just like I can't prove that a thousand-foot purple guy isn't doing cartwheels some where out there), but religion exists to make us feel better about dying. If we didn't die, we would have no reason for gods or religion, because we could accomplish everything we needed or wanted on our own, though it might take a few million years....
Religion & science are very similar, they are both made up of theories, the only difference in my mind is that science has much more believable theories & I will carry on believing science, until the day some fucking thing slaps me around the face & tells me thereā??s no such thing as time or space or even life.
I hate religion, but donā??t get me wrong im not racist or anything, I donā??t like RELIGION, I have nothing against religious people, apart from the people who set up the religion in the first place & those who try to force in on others, everyone has the right to believe in what they want. I like certain ideas in religion but I hate the thing itself.
Now weā??ve got that cleared up. The majority thinks religion is BS yeah? Therefore the pope, all the bishops & priests etc are professional bullshitters!!! hahahahahahaha
LOL....dude racism is thinking your better than somone because of where they are from in the world. I dont knwo what being against religion is called....i know hating jewish people is antisemitism....maybe its Secularism....or Antireligion.........or maybe Antitheism.....who knows......hopefully someone cause i would like to know....lolQuote:
Originally Posted by dreadydrug