I was just wondering if anyone here has done any nude modeling? Not, porn, but modeling done in a classy professional way.
Also, what would you say if a professional photographer came up and asked you to model?
Printable View
I was just wondering if anyone here has done any nude modeling? Not, porn, but modeling done in a classy professional way.
Also, what would you say if a professional photographer came up and asked you to model?
i'd ask what's the diffrence... pornography is such a loose term, as is art when in this context....
a billion people are going to be jerking it to the picture whether you call it art or porn, i fail to see any real diffrence... just imo tho.
^^ lol, so true....... I never have, nor will i for that matter, whats the point in that for me.......i know one girl asked me to take pics of her before we did it, and she gave me the cam, it was quite weird, and she got off on it major, i wanted to bust some nuts, so i snapped a few, and got to the fuckin lol.......so i guess i've been involved with someone posin in the nude.......even though it was totally unexpected.........
The difference is exploiting a body for sex, and then using one to capture beauty.
I had been asked on suicide girls.com but John wouldn't allow me. But there like pin up porn. But Im still a member there.
seriously...........porn is porn. Anyone could argue that anything is art.Quote:
Originally Posted by slipknotpsycho
The problem is you may have one thing in mind and the photographer may have something else in mind. They may present it as artistic at first and it may quickly get into something else. Some of those guys are so slick they can talk anyone into doing anything. These days if I was a girl and I was offered even a photo shoot with no nudity, I would take about a dozen friends with me.Quote:
Originally Posted by The.Severed.Angel
What exactly did you mean by the second question?
so your definition of porn is only when nudity and sexual acts are involved.... ?Quote:
Originally Posted by The.Severed.Angel
i mean i could show you the flaw in that with one very extreme example but i'm trying to refrain from doing so...
i got no problem with porn, i have a crap load of it on my computer... but a naked body is a naked body whether you call it art or porn... unless it happens to be an artist actually painting a picture (not a photograph) or making a sculture, or sketching/drawing a body....
Porn is defined as the explicit representation of the human body or sexual activity with the goal of sexual arousal and/or sexual relief.
So if a chick spreads her legs its still art, but if she spreads her lips its now porn.
If a dudes dick is limp its art, but if he has a hard on its now porn.
I think its in the eyes of the beholder. I can appreciate the female and even male form. Its natural.
ok you forced me to do it... (again this whole thing is imo and by no means to be taken as 'the word'...)
but what about those individuals who photograph children nude, in 'non-sexual' manners and try to call it art...
you'd call it child porn correct?
see i've never really understood the line between them.... if a nude child just standing upright is child porn, how is a nude woman standing up just art....?
beauty is in the eye of the beerholder. nudes are not porn.
i just don't think i'll ever understand the diffrence between nude porn and nude art...
Depending on how comfortable I'd feel around the photographer I might do it. I guess I'm kind of a closet exhibitionist though... if there is such a thing.
I don't know if there's really a huge market for nude male models though.
Just look at Joe Francis, he can get girls to do anything just for a T-Shirt.Quote:
Originally Posted by FakeBoobsRule
I've thought about it, but would most likely never be comfortable with it. I have some friends that are photographers..and they are dudes..and I just know they would be in it for more than the pictures..Quote:
Originally Posted by The.Severed.Angel
..I had a chick friend of mine as if we would do some once...but that never happened.
I think it would be cool.
..but if a random stranger wanted to I wouldn't be down.
I would do it and I'm a guy. Several girls have told me that I should do it. But, I'm not arrogant or anything like most models, I just like to smoke cannabis so it will probably never happen. If anything I would just do it for the money, lol, because I have no problem just standing there or whatever, I'd be really high, so it would be funny to me.
Quote:
Originally Posted by The.Severed.Angel
exactly. look back in history at all the art of naked women. they were painted or drawn because of their beauty, not so other people can jerk off. we just live in a horny society:thumbsup:
im ok with nude modeling....but it depends on what its for.....tasteful, yes....nasty stuff, nope. But, even if a photographer has good intentions with his work, some of them can be creepy, or just give off that 'weirdo' vibe....lol thats why i always take my hubby with me. If i dont like the photographer, i'm out
For art "life" classes in painting and sketching, there are always jobs for young men and women, although women get the majority of them. Many schools and universities hire their models through an agent, so you might want to look into it. It's not easy work, since you have to hold the positions for a while until you go on a break.Quote:
Originally Posted by LuckyG
Since it usually pays much more, photographic modeling is harder to break into than art modeling.
A number of years ago a moonlighting NYC fireman did some nude photo modeling, and was told by the photographer that the pictures would be used in a magazine for women. They ended up on a gay-male calendar that was published. He was not happy about this.
ATTENTION: I RUN MY OWN NUDE MODELING COMPANY. ANY WOMEN WHO ARE INTERESTED GET BACK TO ME THEN WE CAN SET UP A PHOTO SHOOT IN A ROOM I RENT AT MOTEL 6.
^^ Notice that his current mood is horny.
Might want to change that next time :jointsmile:
I think tasteful nudes can be very beautiful. I would be very skeptical about someone I didnt know VERY well asking me to model. I also wouldnt go alone regardless of how well I thought I knew the person.
I have been approached to model in my local malls and stuff and I always say no because I don't ant to be scammed and show up to a dungeon with cameras and handcuffs or something. I have let my boyfriend take really nice nude pictures of me, they were all basically from one still drunken morning of us laying in bed toegther bc we somehow woke up with a camera next to us. i really liked how they turned out. the ones from the night before were a little trashy so i deleted them but the others were very sweet and adorable lol
Yeah, I could. But the beauty of it is that it always applies! The other ones change.Quote:
Originally Posted by Veratyr Star
HELL YEAH I would get nekkid for money. Why the fuck not? Right now with rent coming up and no income Id do just about anything for money. No gay sex though.. I draw the line there. For less than a billion dollars lmao.
I gotten an offer to do a porno.
But I turned it down. No way I'm going to wack in front of a camera, even though it was expenses paid, and I would get $1000 for like 20 minutes of work.
But nude modeling, I'd go for.
you're lying... i garuntee if some guy approached you for a film and said i'll give you 200k to let this guy suck you then pound him in the ass you'd ask where the condoms are... (i've never met anyone in my life would turn it down if the money were there, and believe me, i have seen the epitomy of homophobia and anti-gay religious people......)Quote:
Originally Posted by GraziLovesMary
So, if it were vice versa and the guy pounded you on the ass for 200K, you'd do it? I doubt it. I'm not a homophobe either.
My virgin butthole is priceless.
well see that way takes it to a whole new level... alteast imo... for a price i honestly say i would... but if you were a 'butt hole virgin' so to speak it would be painful...Quote:
Originally Posted by thcbongman
would probably depend on the needs of the person at the time of the offering...
the other way around tho... you could close your eyes and pretend it was a girl... not asking you to enjoy it, just do it.
perhaps i'm wrong... but i've yet to meet anyone regaurdless of how anti-gay they were who i was honestly able to look at them and say they would pass up such a sum of money for such a task....
Since you put it that way, that would be a tempting offer for easy money. Still 200K for emotional damage for the rest of your life......that's a hard decision.
oh come on, emotional damage?
Yeah man, you would carry shame on your face, sacrificing your values for cash.
Now if one was gay, I think they'd be okay with it. But if you weren't......you'd feel disgusted to do such a thing. People sold themselves for smaller amounts, but that doesn't mean they wouldn't be traumatized by the event.
200K is still a small price to pay. If it was like 5M I'm consider it, because with the pain I'd have to go through for doing it, at least I'll be well off for the rest of my life. 200K doesn't guarantee that.
if 200k were enough to convince you to do it, you obviously don't feel as strongly against it as you claim...
like i said i've never met anyone who i believe is serious when they say no..... every guy i've asked a similar question that said no, was almost definately only saying no to project that oh so manly image....
But I did admit I would contemplate it. And I'm hardly the type of guy that would project an alpha male image.
It doesn't mean there wouldn't be consequences to your well-being and you would feel bad about violating your morals.
haha one time when walking around campus we were asked and I said no but one of my friends said yes then they gave him $10 for only standing nude for a half hour we were all pissed and trying to take our cloths off and get in that room.
Option A: 7 dudes runnin a train on some nasty sweaty party hoe who can't wait to swallow all their jizz and count her cashQuote:
Originally Posted by slipknotpsycho
Option B: a graceful scene portraying a naked female in the form of an angel, flying elegently over an open plain and towards the sunrise in the distance
And you seriously cannot understand the difference between these two things?
I'm still not seeing it.Quote:
Originally Posted by lagstronaut
read my posts again.... you obviously are having some problems understanding here....Quote:
Originally Posted by lagstronaut
not every image that portrays a nude female not doing something sexual (i.e. spreading her self, sexual things involving someone else or shoving something in her etc) are art....
especially refer to post number 11.... it is extreme but illistrates perfecly my problem in identifying what is art and what is porn.... (again, extreme example but the point i have stands there) since i can't very well go and start posting pics of examples....
forgive i just don't understand, again i own lots of porn (probably more then the average guy)...
i'm just having problems seeing a diffrence... i mean by that same thought process alot of playboy pictures are art, not porn... since they are 'posed' in such an 'artful' fashion among random back drops....
Plus, you make it sounds like porn is disgusting, I think it's 10x better than "art".Quote:
Originally Posted by lagstronaut