Printable View
ok i was listening to a podcast a few days ago by the dope fiend and he said something about how bong rips are actually worse for you than SMOKING A BLUNT in some cases
i had ALWAYS thought bong rips were wayyyy better for you becuase of the water filtration, so this statement really intrigued me
anyone hear of this? or have any other info on it??
First of all you hear it from someone named Dope Fiend so you take anything he says with a grain of salt. Second, UM is that University of Michigan? If so, fuck michigan, if not, nevermind.
the water filters the smoke, you aren't smoking the tobacco leaf paper, and you are still inhaling smoke. maybe just the quantity of smoke is bad, but if you smoke a blunt or X amount of bong rips with the same weed, its going to be the same smoke, but the bong rips will be cleaner after being filtered through the water. i don't see how it could be any worse for you.
smoking blunts is way worse than rippin tubes.
really think about it... blunts are nasty
no.
directed towards fucknut
ohh i mean bucknut, my bad...
honestly, i heard bong rips are worse...Quote:
Originally Posted by dejayou30
I REALLY wanna find some more info on this. im thinking it has to do with the amount of smoke you take in. idk about you guys but i take as big of bong rip as my lungs can hold... so maybe it chalks up your lungs easier and gets caught in your tissue???? thats probably not the case, someone help me out on this one
Consider this; how is either one actually good for your lungs? so does it really matter if one is a bit worse off then the other? Smoke MJ the way ya like it, thats the bottom line :D
Quote:
Originally Posted by UMrocksmysocks
AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHH AHAHAH
PENN STATE all the way. :D :D
In a way, bong rips are worse, because you have the flame on the weed for each hit, whereas blunts are cherried.