Top 25 Favorite Ann Coulter Quotes

Top 25 Favorite Ann Coulter Quotes
Right Wing News ^ | 11-23-04 | John Hawkins


There's no conservative pundit more quotable than Ann Coulter which is why I compiled my favorite 25 quotes from Ms. Coulter, in order. Enjoy!

25) "The New York Times review blamed (Kitty) Kelley's gossip mongering on "a cultural climate in which gossip and innuendo thrive on the Internet." Kelley has been writing these books for decades, so apparently, like the Texas Air National Guard, Kelley was on the Internet â?? and being influenced by it â?? back in the '70s. As I remember it, for the past few years it has been the Internet that keeps dissecting and discrediting the gossip and innuendo that the major media put out."

24) "Liberals become indignant when you question their patriotism, but simultaneously work overtime to give terrorists a cushion for the next attack and laugh at dumb Americans who love their country and hate the enemy."

23) "The leaders of the modern Democratic Party, Hannity says, have made excuses for evil for so long that they cannot recognize evil anymore. The closest thing to it in their vocabulary would be "someone who wears fur." And of course, they recognize evil in the person of "George W. Bush," whom they see as the very essence of evil. In fact, Bush may be the only force of evil in the world liberals haven't wanted to appease."

22) "Reagan took an approach to the Cold War dramatically different from any other US President. To wit, he thought we should win. This was a fresh concept. At the time, it was widely ridiculed as a dangerous alteration of US policy. Only after it worked was Reagan's dangerous foreign policy recast as merely a continuation of the policies of his predecessors."

21) "While the form of treachery varies slightly from case to case, liberals always manage to take the position that most undermines American security."

20) "Even if corners were cut, (Iran-Contra) was a brilliant scheme. There is no possibility that anyone in any Democratic administration would have gone to such lengths to fund anti-Communist forces. When Democrats scheme from the White House, it's to cover up the President's affair with an intern. When Republicans scheme, it's to support embattled anti-Communist freedom fighters sold out by the Democrats."

19) "Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld said any assumption that the US would not use force against North Korea would be a mistake. Such bellicosity frightens liberals. The left's reaction to nutty despots is: he might hit me, so I'll be nice. Rumsfeld's idea is: He'll hit me? Maybe I'll hit him. The beauty of that approach cannot be denied."

18) "The reason any conservative's failing is always major news is that it allows liberals to engage in their very favorite taunt: Hypocrisy! Hypocrisy is the only sin that really inflames them. Inasmuch as liberals have no morals, they can sit back and criticize other people for failing to meet the standards that liberals simply renounce. It's an intriguing strategy. By openly admitting to being philanderers, draft dodgers, liars, weasels and cowards, liberals avoid ever being hypocrites."

17) "For fifty years, America's foreign policy failures have not been problems of "national dialogue" or "preventative" action or the national psyche. There is one simple problem: Democrats can't handle foreign policy. You could almost forgive the Democrats for their spectacular record of failure in foreign policy. But then they have the audacity to cite their own derelict handling of the military to argue that it is always a fool's errand to deploy troops in defense of the nation. Remember Vietnam!"

16) "(Sheryl) Crow explained that the 'best way to solve problems is to not have enemies.' War solves that problem too: We won't have any enemies because we're going to kill them. Crow warned of 'huge karmic retributions that will follow.' She seemed not to understand that America going to war is huge karmic retribution. They killed three thousand Americans and now they're going to die."

15) "Liberals said Reagan was dangerous and his rhetoric scary. They ridiculed him as an idiot for believing the Soviet Union could be toppled. They opposed him on every front -- strengthening the military, aiding and arming anti-Communist rebels around the world, invading Grenada, preparing to win a nuclear war, building a nuclear shield, and waging a spiritual crusade against Soviet totalitarianism. Reagan said the Soviet Union was an evil empire and we would prevail. He called the ball, the shot, and the pocket, and he won the game. But now we're supposed to believe he was lucky. Liberals lie about Reagan's victory because when Reagan won the Cold War, he proved them wrong on everything they had done and said throughout the Cold War."

14) "'Stupid' means one thing: "threatening to the interests of the Democratic Party." The more Conservative the Republican, the more vicious and hysterical the attacks on his intelligence will be."

13) "(Mel) Gibson didn't insert Jews into ("The Passion of the Christ") for some Machiavellian, racist reason. Christ was a Jew crucified by Romans at the request of other Jews in Jerusalem. I suppose if Gibson had moved the story to suburban Cleveland and portrayed Republican logging executives crucifying Christ, the left would calm down. But it simply didn't happen that way."

12) "Democrats always assure us that deterrence will work, but when the time comes to deter, they're against it."

11) "The Great Satan is wearying of this reverse hegemony, in which little pipsqueak nations try to impose their pipsqueak values on us. Aren't we the ones who should be arrogantly oppressing countries that unaccountably do not have the death penalty?"

10) "Looking at the line-up of speakers at the (Democratic National) Convention, I have developed the 7-11 challenge: I will quit making fun of, for example, Dennis Kucinich, if he can prove he can run a 7-11 properly for 8 hours. We'll even let him have an hour or so of preparation before we open up. Within 8 hours, the money will be gone, the store will be empty, and he'll be explaining how three 11-year olds came in and asked for the money and he gave it to them."

9) "Much of the left's hate speech bears greater similarity to a psychological disorder than to standard political discourse. The hatred is blinding, producing logical contradictions that would be impossible to sustain were it not for the central element faith plays in the left's new religion. The basic tenet of their faith is this: Maybe they were wrong on facts and policies, but they are good and conservatives are evil. You almost want to give it to them. It's all they have left."

8) "No matter what the evidence, liberals insist that only their tender ministrations are capable of calming murderous dictators. Negotiation and engagement are said to "work" because, after Democrats spend years dillydallying with lunatic despots who threaten America, eventually a Republican president comes in and threatens aggressive military action. In a fascinating fifty-year pattern -- completely indiscernible to liberals -- murderous despots succumb to "engagement" shortly after a Republican president threatens to bomb them. This allows liberals to hail years of impotent negotiation and engagement as a foreign policy 'win'."

7) "Gore said foreigners are not worried about 'what the terrorist networks are going to do, but about what we're going to do.' Good. They should be worried. They hate us? We hate them. Americans don't want to make Islamic fanatics love us. We want to make them die. There's nothing like horrendous physical pain to quell anger. Japanese Kamikazes pilots hated us once, too. A couple of well-aimed nuclear weapons got their attention. Now they are gentle little lambs."

6) "If it were true that conservatives were racist, sexist, homophobic, fascist, stupid, inflexible, angry, and self-righteous, shouldn't their arguments be easy to deconstruct? Someone who is making a point out of anger, ideology, inflexibility, or resentment would presumably construct a flimsy argument. So why can't the argument itself be dismembered rather than the speaker's personal style or hidden motives? Why the evasions?"

5) "Hearing politicians tell us "we" can't "afford" a tax cut is like listening to a glutton tell you he can't "afford" a diet. In no other context do people talk about "paying for" money they don't have. I can't pay for your refusal to give me money because I need a yacht."

4) "Liberals hate religion because politics is a religion substitute for liberals and they can't stand the competition."

3) "Not exactly smashing stereotypes of liberals as mincing pantywaists, the left's entire contribution to the war effort thus far has been to whine."

2) "The common wisdom holds that "both parties" have to appeal to the extremes during the primary and then move to the center for the general election. To the contrary, both parties run for office as conservatives. Once they have fooled the voters and are safely in office, Republicans sometimes double-cross the voters. Democrats always do."

1) "In the corporeal world, international law is whatever the United States and Great Britain say it is."

John Hawkins

so let me get this straight, there are liberals, and there are republicans, that's it?

who is she talking about when she talks about liberals?

does being against bush's total amnesty and open borders make me a liberal? or the gun control laws? or how he further funded abortion promoting organizations? or signging back onto unesco and the UN? expanding the dept. of education...appointing the guy who wrote the torture memo and says citizens should be arrested for misdemeanors to the AG...what about the FTAA? does being against selling out our authority on trade and getting a pan american union mean i'm liberal?

it's conservative to destroy the constitution?

does being against all that make me a liberal? you've never told me what i am. here the whole time being against bush for his communist and fascist programs i thought i was against tyranny, not some made up left or right side...

there is no left and right...there was no left and right at one time in this country, what does that tell you? you got that bullshit from the elite families that funded the universities that started teaching it. and now it's everywhere.

divide and conquer. you can point out all the corruption on the left, but can't see any of it on the right, when it's equally as bad. the same is true of the other 'side'...yo'ure both being screwed. what's so difficult to understand?

but you're content being lied to and believing the lies, and you love death and destruction, and you call yourself a christian, so i really don't think you know what's going on.

"does being against bush's total amnesty and open borders make me a liberal?"

Yes! This country was founded on open boarders. If you are for closed boarders, then yes, on that issue you could be called liberal in your views.

"you've never told me what i am."

Oh man, that's so wide open I can't bring myself to take you up on it.

Toker

i'm against the welfare the healthcare costs, and the countless other costs. i'm also against illegals getting hospital care before citizens for free, and not being allowed to be arrested by police. the preferential treatment they get with housing around the country too is also deplorable, it discriminates against citizens. but that's what the feds tell the apartment managers around the country to do...so this is federally mandated.

the tax incentives that foreign people get, from all countries, is also quite discriminatory against citizens.

if they want this so bad, it must be good.

if people come here and work and learn the language and assimiliate as they did when the country was founded and don't expect a handout, great, if they come here because they know they can get free shit, that's not so great. i'm kind of against paying for foreign people's health and other stuff, which i guess you could compare to socialism.

i would hardly call that liberal.

I am against handouts, welfare and the like also, but I am also against closing the boarders up tight. That is not what makes it a conservitive issue, or a liberal one. History has shown US that standing armys, and military boarders are not a good thing to have. History has also shown US that open boarders is a good thing to have. Can you show me where one dictator, commi, socialist or any other power structure has ever used open boarders to control the people? I don't get you man, you seem to hate any kind of control over the people, and then turn around and want to control the people.

Toker

who do i want to control? i want people to be able to defend their property, and i think some group should be available to quell any incursions that might occur, and they do occur.

i agree with this, for the most part:
http://badnarik.org/plans_immigration.php

do i want to control the foreign criminals who want to get across the border? i guess so, i think criminals getting over is bad.

And I agree with this for the most part.

http://www.lp.org/issues/immigration.html

"i think criminals getting over is bad."

It seems a little like you might think poor people coming over the boarders is a bad thing also.

Toker

guess wut!!!?!?!? anna cultavator is big fat bitch women and michael moore will eat her!!!!!!!

I've never met an intelligent person who uses generalizations
~007~

We'll yopur about to meet one :P

You un-intellegent person... how do you define un-intllegent?

It's not having intellegence.... So everything that has intellegence is intellegent....
......
Wow you really put that peron in the intellegent - generalization.

You just made an gernalization dude..

The C :D