We have lost the drug war
http://www.mapinc.org/norml/v06/n1739/a02.htm
I don't know whether America is going to win the war in Iraq, but I do know that we have lost the war against the use of drugs, which we have pursued for the past 30-plus years. The war on drugs has been a dismal failure. It is not truly a war against drugs, but a war against us - our people, our children, ourselves.
President Nixon, when running for president, coined the expression, "war on drugs," knowing that appearing tough on crime would get him many votes.
After Nixon's election, Congress passed legislation giving massive funding to police departments throughout the country to fight the war on drugs. The politicians passed harsh laws for mandatory minimum sentences and for "three strikes and you're out" sentences. The mentality that has prevailed is "lock them up, throw the key away, and the drug problem will go away." We've locked them up, but, unfortunately, the problem has not gone away.
Worse Than Ever
As a matter of fact, the drug problem has become worse. Whether we want to admit it or not, we absolutely cannot arrest our way out of the drug problem. Walter Cronkite recently wrote a letter asking more than 100,000 people to help end the drug war at home. In explaining the reasons for doing so, he stated, "It surely hasn't made our streets safer. Instead, we have locked up literally millions of people - disproportionately people of color - who have caused little or no harm to others - wasting resources that could be used for counter-terrorism, reducing violent crime, or catching white-collar criminals."
Humans for hundreds of years have been using alcohol, coffee, tobacco, marijuana, opium and other addictive and mood-affecting drugs. Legal or illegal drugs and crime go hand in hand. Most of the criminal cases I handled on the bench, such as violence, robbery, and thievery were intertwined with alcohol and drugs. Interestingly, we don't arrest people for drinking alcohol, or smoking tobacco, the two worst drugs known to human beings. In the United States, tobacco kills 430,000 people every year; alcohol kills another 110,000. All the illegal drugs combined in the United State kill fewer than 18,000 people.
We have tried to use force, prohibition and incarceration to control the drug market. We have increased the patrol and inspection of our nation's borders. We have increased arrests for violation of drug laws and lengthened sentences. We have poured billions of dollars into overseas anti-drug paramilitary operations. What are the results?
The reality is that our efforts have led to a more efficient drug trade and a hugely profitable drug market. Every year, we're spending about 70 billion to fight this war. Every year we are arresting 1.6 million people - mostly young people - for non-violent drug offenses, thereby clogging our courts. Our prison system has quadrupled in the past 20 years, making building prisons in America the fastest growing industry. There are over 2 million prisoners in the United States, which means we who make up 5 percent of the total global population, now have 25 percent of the world's prisoners. Significantly, although African Americans account for only 12 percent of the U.S. population, 44 percent of all prisoners in the United States are African Americans. Violent crime is not responsible for the quadrupling of the incarcerated population since 1980. The single greatest force behind the growth of the prison population has been the war on drugs.
With all these lives we're destroying every year, and all the money we're spending, drugs are cheaper, are more potent, and easier to get than when the war against drugs began. Everything from crack cocaine to marijuana is just a phone call away. You can buy it on any street, in any school yard, in any small farm town. As a 2002 drug survey by the National Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse at Columbia University revealed, schoolchildren across the country say it is easier for them to buy marijuana than it is to buy beer and cigarettes. Is it perhaps because alcohol is controlled by the government, whereas drug distribution is controlled by organized crime?
I think that it is time to rethink our strategy and to redefine our goals. We obviously cannot depend on our politicians to extricate us from this quagmire. We must admit that we're losing the war on drugs. As parents concerned about protecting our children from drug-related harm, we must alter our way of thinking and hopefully find ways to claim victory. We must look for alternatives. One hears many voices proclaiming that the answer is treatment, education and prevention. There are also many voices out there that proclaim that in order to end the war on drugs, and end drug prohibition, the answer is to legalize and regulate drugs so that we can run the mob out of a highly profitable business that pay no taxes on their huge profits. We can then control the drug market, regulate it and tax it.
Public Action
No one likes to admit being a loser. But since the politicians will not cure this societal ailment, is it feasible to believe that we the people somehow can organize, mobilize and publicize the disastrous consequences of a drug war against our children and ourselves and put an end to it? What do you think?
We have lost the drug war
http://www.mapinc.org/newsnorml/v06/n1649/a03.html
Business is always good. That's what Capt. Greg P. Majoy commander of the Erie County Drug Task says when you ask him about his job. The task force may disband because of a lack of money for staffing, but the reality is if there were 100 members on it, there still would be a drug problem in Erie County and the rest of the nation.
Majoy, a straight shooter, doesn't make any bones about it. Arrest one drug dealer, and someone else will step up to fill the vaccum. Major cocaine dealers ( by Sandusky standards ) Ladonte Skelton and Shaunsay J. Gowdy have gone to prison in the last year, and the drugs continue to flow.
It's simple. As long as there is supply there will be demand.
Some 40 years after harsh Rockefeller drug laws were enacted, what we have to show for prohibition? It has worked as well at stopping drug use as it did alcohol use.
Who has benefitted? Not the thousands of non-violent addicts behind bars who would be better off with treatment rather than prison. Not the taxpayers who are paying to keep drug addicts behind bars even though they would pay far less for drug treatment.
So who has profited? The drug dealers, the banks that launder their money and the politicians who pass draconian drug laws so they can appear tough on crime and get re-elected. Meanwhile, the U.S. leads the world with some 2.2 million prisoners primarily because of new drug laws that quadrupled the prison population since 1985.
The drug war has destroyed far more lives than it saved. The potency of drugs like heroin is up, and despite more post- Sept. 11 seizures because of increased security, drugs are still easy to find. Legalizing drugs would not eliminate the problems associated with them, but it would drastically reduce the problem. Remember that society's attitude about drugs was not always so strict, and we managed to survive as a nation.
Washington grew hemp on his farm, cocaine used to be an ingredient in Coca-Cola and morphine was used to treat wounded soldiers until they started getting addicted to it.
The nation would not go to hell in a handbasket if we legalized drugs. Why risk getting arrested buying them on the street when you can purchase them at CVS? The taxes would help pay for treatment for people who want to get off of them.
Laws against people younger than 18 using drugs would remain, and it would still be illegal to mug old ladies or rob convenience stores to feed your habit, but if someone wants to smoke pot, snort cocaine or shoot heroin in the privacy of his or her home, why is that anyone else's business?
Legalization would eliminate casual users from getting arrested, unclogging prisons, and freeing up police to go after predators, which is what they prefer to be doing. There would be less horror stories like the grandmother recently killed in Atlanta after shooting it out with police who entered her home with a no-knock warrant in what her family believes was a case of mistaken identity.
Majoy thinks legalization is the equivalent of giving up on people. He cites the drug user and drug dealer he busted who turned her life around and is now getting her master's degree. I feel there are people who can turn their lives around, Majoy said last week.
But he concedes that is difficult to turn their lives around because of the lack of proper drug treatment. He is tired of busting people whose fathers and grandfathers he arrested.
Legalization would provide the money for better drug treatment which is not a panacea -- rich people who usually get the best drug treatment still have relapses -- but it costs a lot less than prison. And most of the people we send to prison are going to get out, so we should increase the chances they will contribute to the community, not prey on it.
We have lost the drug war
been said before. still encouraging it of course.
We have lost the drug war
Quote:
Originally Posted by Markass
i always thought it was vice versa, as long as there is demand there wil be supply as well as the other way around.
