Comrade Kerry Foments Dissent..Consequence:Higher US MIlitary Death Toll

Comrade Kerry Foments Dissent....Consequence: Higher US Military Death Toll
The Federalist Patriot ^ | Nov. 1, 2004 | The Federalist


A vote for John Kerry... (Please forward this message to anyone who still thinks John Kerry is fit for command.)

A vote for John Kerry is a vote AGAINST the U.S. military personnel who liberated Iraq -- those Soldiers, Sailors, Airmen and Marines -- who are now on the frontline defending our critical national interests in the region against Jihadi terrorists. It is also a vote against those who have already provided the last measure on that front in service to our great nation.

Indeed, there is a direct correlation between Kerry's efforts to politicize dissent against U.S. resolve in the war against terrorism -- specifically on the Iraqi warfront -- and American and Allied causalities on that front. Those forces, including countless Iraqis, are being injured and killed in ever-increasing numbers because of the political discord Kerry and his ilk are fomenting. If you think there is not a connection between Kerry's campaign rhetoric and U.S. casualties, read on....

Kerry has reduced the war to liberate Iraq to nothing more than political fodder, which has emboldened our Jihadi enemies. As noted recently by Professor Mohammad Amin Bashar at Baghdad's Islamic University, "If the U.S. Army suffered numerous humiliating losses, Kerry would emerge as the superman of the American people." To that end, Abu Jalal, an influential Iraqi resistance leader, said last month, "American elections and Iraq are linked tightly together. We've got to work to change the election, and we've done so. With our strikes, we've dragged Bush into the mud."

The net effect of Kerry's dissention can certainly be felt in terms of increased numbers of American and Allied casualties. A few weeks ago, John Edwards unwittingly provided the evidence for this very correlation: "We lost more troops in September than we lost in August; lost more in August than we lost in July; lost more in July than we lost in June." This was, and remains, the unavoidable consequence of Kerry's reckless campaign rhetoric. The blood of those American Patriots (like the blood of his "brothers" in Vietnam, after he used that war as fodder for his 1972 congressional campaign), is on John Kerry's hands.

To be sure, this is the harshest of all condemnations. But it is also the truth.

Now, Osama bin Laden, who planned the 9/11 attack killing 3,000 of our countrymen -- men, women and children -- has emerged from his rat hole, and issued a statement which is, unquestionably, timed to support John Kerry.

In that light, the most challenging question that can be asked on this, the eve of the 2004 Presidential Election, is not so much, "For whom will you vote?" but "With whom will you vote?" Will you vote with Osama bin Laden, Abu Jalal, Saddam Hussein and Abu Musab Al-Zarqawi? How about Kim Jong-Il, Mohammad Khatami, Moammar al-Ghadafi and Hu Jingtao. All of these tyrants support John Kerry. or...

Will you vote with America's fighting forces, who, according to a just- published Army Times poll, overwhelmingly support President George W. Bush. In fact, 82 percent of our Armed Forces said they do not want John Kerry as their Commander in Chief. On Tuesday, SUPPORT OUR TROOPS -- VOTE FOR GEORGE W. BUSH!

(The above comment is excerpted from The Federalist Patriot No. 04-42. The Patriot is the most widely subscribed e-journal on the Internet. Get your subscription today -- it's FREE by e-mail. Link to -- http://FederalistPatriot.com/subscribe/ ) "There is no good government but what is republican." --John Adams

does supporting the troops mean i have to support them breathing depleted uranium and being denied treatment for gulf war illness once they come back?

Soldiers follow orders , all mail sent through the military is censored , the goverments of the US and Britain and the interested parties in the middle east all lied in order to sieze control of the oil reserves in Iraq. The Iraqi people don't trust the Americans because of the heavy handed bully boy tactics of certain troops , the behaviour of people like English (sick bitch deserves a bullet) and the idea that some goverment who screwed the country years ago by putting Saddam in power is suddenly going to help them.
People DO support the troops but even the troops must be asking themselves "why the fuck are we here"? I bet you thought Vietnam was a good idea.
I can't believe that people can be so blind to the truth , America is a selve serving meglomaniacal state that believes it has the god given right to stick it's nose in where it is neither wanted or appreciated . Never mind "Remember the Alamo" remember Vietnam!!!
Soldiers are coming home in bodybags because of the greed of corporate america and the power hunger of it's goverment , that is what people object to.

America didn't go into Iraq to liberate the Iraqis. Bush ordered them in for oil and because America can't tollerate anyone other than them having a powerful military. Bush doesn't give a shit about other people unless it gains money or 1) He would help countries who need help so much more 2) He would try to limit the amount of CO2 and other huge amounts of pollution which America is creating which will soon destroy the planet including huge numbers of people if it isn't stopped soon. Florida, remember that hurricane? You can expect a lot more if you don't stop polluting so you can earn more money.