PROVE MY DUMBASS FRIEND WRONG PLEASE GOD

ok. every fucking day i have the same debate with the same kid. he is trying to tell me that smoking weed can, and will give you lung cancer and you will die if enough is smoked. his argument is that smoking anything (smoke inhalation) will give you cancer and youll die. and i say...hmm...that explains why there has never been a single documented case of lung cancer or death as a result of cannabis alone....

if im wrong, please someone tell me, but lets hear what you guys think.

I don't think it can't happen. But from wht I read, and found out the truth n how the govt lied to us n ur friend,plus 2 days daily factoid chances are very very slim. *looks < to > all of a sudden paranoid* F U uncle sam 4 all the bullshit propaganda u poisned us with n if ur watching n try 2 seize me I warn u my house is wired 2 blow. N no I'm not some crazed hippie *tokes a bowl*

it cannot happen. i have found many credible sites, a few that clearly say "An exhaustive search of the literature finds no credible reports of deaths induced by marijuana" which is a direct quote btw. and hes still telling me that it will give you cancer and die.

you think there would have to SOME reported case of a guy who blazed daily for 50years or something and got lung cancer, if weed could give you lung cancer.

Wht about smokin weed withblunts all the time? I hear they have nicotine. Is there a chance of getting cance, u think?

nextlineismine: exactly. there has never ever in the history of the world been a documented case of death directly related to smoking cannabis, (deaths while under the influence not included).

here:


http://www.reconsider.org/issues/pub...ed_deaths_.htm

http://www.drugwarfacts.org/causes.htm

tell him yeah it does give you lung cancer so go start smokin fuckhead :-)

Have you brought up the polonium argument yet? I'm lazy, so I'm just copying and pasting this from another post of mine.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by graph

Cancer is a very dangerous thing, and there have been arguments back and forth about what is worse. Keep in mind, while tar has shown to be one of many contributing factors in lung cancer, what has shown to be more prevalent in causing any type of cancer is radioactivity. Tobacco industries use polonium-210, which is a radioactive substance, to grow tobacco plants. While the FDA says that polonium-210 was shown to have no negative side affects while ingesting plants grown using the radioactive substance, it is still inconclusive if smoking such plant can cause lung cancer. Also, keep in mind cannabis users don't smoke leaves, but the bud, which contains 33% less tar, and cannabis does not narrow the air passages in the lungs like tobacco.

---

Now, smoking anything is harmful to you, but there are other ways to use cannabis. For example, you could eat or vaporize.

Ok, this calls for us to think about it logically.

Cannabis has no direct link whatsoever with any form of cancerous tissue, although, i hate to say it, any smoke will be bad for your lungs, altohugh maybe cannabis really isnt. What i do know is, no one has ever died from cannabis, no one will ever die from cannabis, which makes me think, maybe it actually doesnt cause cancer, and maybe it does prevent it. I dont know, but im gunner carry on smoking it, and if i get cancer, i'll let you know.

Your friend is brainwashed by government propaganda im afraid