check it out....
http://www.cam.net.uk/home/nimmann/peace/explosions.htm
Printable View
check it out....
http://www.cam.net.uk/home/nimmann/peace/explosions.htm
Those explosives would have been planted where the planes flew into the buildings, because there wasn't any explosions as the building collapsed, nor were there secondary explosions.
I think the planes were enough to bring the towers down.
"he writes. "Muslims are (probably) not to blame for bringing down the WTC buildings after all," "
absolute propaganda rubbish, i saw TWO BIG PLANES fly direct into the towers whats would be the point of a bomb?
there was also another theory that missiles were fired into the towers, but that brings to question, what about all the people who supposedly died on the planes?
more....
http://www.orbwar.com/woolworth/
planes were just for show. explosives were used to bring the buildings down. it didnt look like controlled demolition to you? how did wtc7 just collapse?Quote:
Originally Posted by xNoa
I didn't know there was a 7th tower.
The planes caused the fire which melted the steel infrastructure of the building.
how can you say that when most of the fuel of the plane that hit the south tower burned up on the outside.Quote:
Originally Posted by beachguy in thongs