Bongs have always been my preference at home, but I was wondering if theres any difference in the amount of THC that you consume between Joints, Blunts, Bowls and Bongs. In other words would a bong make less weed go further?
-B
Printable View
Bongs have always been my preference at home, but I was wondering if theres any difference in the amount of THC that you consume between Joints, Blunts, Bowls and Bongs. In other words would a bong make less weed go further?
-B
Bongs do make weed last longer just because you only lighting it when you toking so less is wasted.
yea bongs are the best. they get you higest and save the most weed
You would get just as much thc from a blunt if you were to use the same amount of weed in both. Bong would be more hassle, and you would probably pack it more times than it would take to roll a blunt. Blunts are better. Feel free to have your own opinion but know that i dont care. :)
IMO bongs eat up weed real fast....but maybe thats just mine.Quote:
Originally Posted by dirty raider
SOmething that could be 3-4 hits in the pipe, would only be 1 good hit and 1 poop hit in the bong.
if you use a gravity bong, that will use the least amount of weed and get you the most fucked up, hands down
Actually, if you rolled all that weed into a blunt, you would get less THC, since much of the smoke would be wasted as the blunt burns between hits.
Have you smoked a blunt before, unless you got a fan blowin on that bitch, barely any weed at all gets burned between hits. That is nothing compared to the high you get compared to the high you would get smoking that much weed in a bong.
Yes, I have smoked a blunt before and noticed that it, like joints, wastes some smoke between hits. Even if it might be considered "barely any weed", it is too much. I take a hit off my bowl/bong and then cap it. I don't wanna waste my money.
Can't cap a blunt. :p