Printable View
Northwest Airlines Bomb Photos - ABC News
I swear on my childs life I would have taken a democratic vote onboard that flight on wether to kill this human before we land. I say bring it on Wahabbist boy touchers, you could bomb 50 airliners and it wont do shit.
he must have had moldy nuts to hide the smell of that much explosive... lol
and i say we stick it to him like the guy in 'man on fire'... make him sweat and know he has failed... then dump him outta the side of the plane and make him choose if he wants to hit or explode!! fucking sand******
-J
lol supposed to be a type of explosion that isn't detectable by dogs or scans or something, shrug..Quote:
Originally Posted by mainegrown
In related news, found out from the TV news what seats you should sit in to effect maximum damage to the plane.. guess that will help out any homegrown nuts that don't have the benefit of alqueda training..
Well, I believe a cruise missile or two on the country of origin of the terrorist would be in regular order. Whether the terrorist succeeds or not. Time to go further then Bush/Cheney and actually do something beyond false flag wars, and wipe the scourge from the face of the planet. If they come from Saudi Arabia, missile them without warning, Yemen the same, anywhere they come from the same. And fuck Joe Lieberman too. :twocents:
we got lucky. hats off to that Dutch dude who saved everyones life. :)
here is my idea, instead of having a worthless "no fly list" why not have a "fly list", that is a short list of all people who are absolutely safe to fly with other humans on regular airlines. . . everyone else can fly on Alqueda-Air or something. :jointsmile:
haha that would solve a few problems..Quote:
Originally Posted by boaz
I would consider anyone who fly's a potential terrorist. What kind of an idiot flys now adays with this kind of shit going on? They could stop it all over night just by requiring everyone to get naked before loading.lol
Fearmongering team works everywhere. Spreading government intimidation.
So said "terrorist" used an advanced technology which for most of us have never heard of. It must be some technique went through a lot of lab tests. How could they fail at last procedure like the former "shoe bomber" case? Or the terrorists use some unskillful technique like it was a firework game?
Or most likely some group want to create a terror atmosphere to request more money for their operating fund or ask for more power? Or just a psychological preparation for a bigger coming terror "attack"?
The real flaw is: In both the Shoe bomber case and this Nigerian case, the bomber could go to the toilet room to do their jobs without any disturb. If failed, they could have left without trouble. But they chose to do it in public and both failed. It looked more like a planed show rather then a real plot. Do you think they and their leader are idiots? When in 9/11 the four planes drove so accurately to hit their targets by inexperienced flight school students who had never had the experience to pilot big planes like Boeing and no one missing a bit, is that too strange they failed in such a simple case, repeated same error?
There is always the things going on behind the scenes that the public doesn't get to see. Its easy to get on the bandwagon and blame these terrorists countries for everything. But the truth is our own country is to blame for a lot of this. More and more countries are getting tired of our meddling in countries we don't belong and its a strategic meddling.
There have always been forces in our government to try and spread hate and discontent over seas. Stirring the pot to see if they can't get us involved in another conflict.
I think the Nigerian attempted aircraft bombing case was created to push the legislators to extend the Patriot Act.
Same thing happened in 9/11 when they want the passing through ot the Patriot act. Do you still remember the anthrax attack at that time?
Quote:
12/18/2009 5:58:00 AM
â?¢
Under the radar, Obama pushes for Patriot Act renewal
Feingold expresses frustration over Senate version
With key sections of the U.S. Patriot Act set to expire Dec. 31, the Obama administration - essentially tiptoeing through the corridors of Congress and using the raucous health care debate as cover - has quietly maneuvered for renewal of the controversial provisions, which he opposed as a senator.
Perhaps the most contentious measure is the business records provision, also known as the library provision, which allows the government to seek a court order forcing private entities such as banks, hospitals, and libraries to hand over "any tangible thing" - from library circulation records to medical records - officials think is relevant in a terrorist investigation.
This week, with time running out and no time to debate the bill on its merits, Democratic supporters of reauthorization in the Senate tried but fail to win House support to embed the provisions in a separate $626 billion Pentagon funding bill. The House has passed a bill with stronger civil liberties protections, but that version is not expected to survive.
Congress will now likely approve temporary extensions and deal with reauthorization early next year, giving opponents renewed hope they can still defeat or modify aspects of the national security language.
In early October, the Senate Judiciary Committee voted 11-8 to send the measure to the Senate floor. The provisions would allow the government to continue to use roving wiretaps to monitor suspects, to obtain business records of national security targets, and to track and surveil so-called 'lone wolves' whose connection to a foreign government or terrorist group has not been established.
The legislation, co-sponsored by judiciary committee chairman Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.) and Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.), would tweak the ability of the FBI to gain certain personal records of citizens, requiring the agency to show "specific facts" that requested records pertain to a terrorism investigation.
Core language remains
Richard Moore can be reached at [email protected].
Denied:1up! Software ()