Could you vapourise an object with a soundwave if it was EXTREMELY intense? :stoned:
Printable View
Could you vapourise an object with a soundwave if it was EXTREMELY intense? :stoned:
sure, 'black noise', the Physicists call it :wtf: ... ultra-low vibrations from sound waves (but wouldn't that vaporize the machine, too ???) ... questions, questions, inquiring minds need to know ... :jointsmile:
WAIT !!! edit: what about the lowryders' subwoofers ?????
- future L.A. Times headline: "Police Investigate Mysterious Disappearances of '64 Chevies !" .......
Haha. :jointsmile:Quote:
WAIT !!! edit: what about the lowryders' subwoofers ?????
- future L.A. Times headline: "Police Investigate Mysterious Disappearances of '64 Chevies !" .......
i had an awesome stoned thought yesterday.....
its that your body is on cruise control when your baked cuz your using all your energy in your brain and your thinkin about shit... thats why your so dumb-looking when your high..
then i realized that i was thinking way too hard
"Facts are stubborn things"
John Adams
LMAO, das funny.....and probably true.Quote:
Originally Posted by hotzfrmthebong
I remember chillin outside in my backyard and I was all blind! and was just thinking and my brother yells out to me "Hey!...whats wrong with you!" and I was like huh? and he tells me"dont ever make that face again man! Dat was an ugly face!"
Not sure about the sound wave thing, but you can pop popcorn using cell phones.
Try it... get 8 cell phones and place them in a circle around a pile of popcorn kernels. Call all 8 of the cell phones, and in a few minutes the popcorn will begin to pop :D
I wonder if you can cook a 7-11 burrito that way? :D
I think that, rather than vaporizing, it would just shatter the object in question. I think we need a reasoned discourse in thermodynamics to understand vaporization.
The funny thing is, vaporization is when liquid turns to gas. Vaporizers actually have the wrong title, as they dont turn a liquid to gas, but they turn a solid into a smoke. this is combustion, not vaporization.
Vaporizers should be called combusters, if anything.
The name combuster would be misleading though, as the whole point of a vaporizer is to not combust the plant itself.
I guess they do combust the THC though, so maybe THC combuster would be the correct name. That sounds retarded though.
I hope your joking, this was a prank pulled on youtube and has already been thoroughly refuted by countless other people videotaping themselves and the popcorn never pops.Quote:
Originally Posted by dooobster