Originally Posted by IAmKowalski
Ok, here's a little rant about CFL bulbs that you might find useful... or not... but here's a little rant none the less:
These 23 Watt bulbs have a very very limited effective depth of penetration - keep in mind the inverse square law: very simply, the effective lumen output of the bulb, the amount of light actually reaching your plants is 1/4 as strong at 2x the distance. E=I/R^2 where E=light intensity, I=initial intensity at the point source, and R=radius from the point. So your light output is divided by the square of the distance - inverse square law.
Now, as justanotherbozo pointed out, CFL's actually put out more heat per watt than HPS/MH bulbs. In order to use very very low wattage bulbs like that, you would have to use a lot of them very close to the tops of the plants. You also have to keep the plants very very short - the effective depth of light penetration is very shallow therefore you are trying to keep your buds short and compact and within this effective range where they receive enough light to grow nice and full - part of that range being the space between the tops of the plants and the light.
CFLs work fine, but 23watt bulbs are about the smallest and lowest intensity you can get - they're fine for a reading lamp, but maybe not so appropriate for growing nice big juicy buds. There's nothing wrong with using them for veg, but you want more light depth in bloom.
Like I said those tiny bulbs are fine for veg - but in bloom light intensity actually reaching the plants is just about the most important factor in your final yield (assuming no other factors are totally out of whack) - Your plant in bloom is a solar powered bud factory.
I am currently using four 42 Watt CFL bulbs in bloom, each is about 2 - 3 inches above the plants (errr... plant at the moment as I only have one in bloom right now). Even for my TINY bloom space (18" deep by 30" wide if memory serves... it's night time in there now so I can't measure at the moment) This is about the ABSOLUTE minimum I would go with - most people would say this is far below the minimum really, but it's just barely enough that I always have herb around to smoke. I plan to upgrade when my highly stressed budget allows possibly adding a couple 105 watt CFLs or maybe a small HPS light.
Those 23/30 Watt bulbs will work fine for veg - I've found 5,500k color temp bulbs 23 watt bulbs that I'm running in veg now and they work fine, but I'm also keeping my plants small - under 6" high by topping/fiming and obsessively wire training all the way through veg. (Which is kind of fun actually.... there's something satisfying about harvesting a plant that looks like a cross between an upside-down chandelier and a menorah - some year I want to grow a perfect menorah and give it to one of my herb smoking Jewish friends)
For bloom, you'll want something around 2,700k temp - and you will want to grab the highest wattage bulbs in that color temp that you can get - which happened to be 42 Watt where I'm at :-( If you can find 55 Watt CFL bulbs on the shelf close to 2,700k color temp so much the better.
And forget whatever incandescent equivalent these things are advertised as - you know "120 watt replacement, only consumes 32 watt" that means absolutely nothing. Actually it means LESS than nothing because it causes a whole lot of confusion - what they are really saying is "32 watt bulb that produces the same amount of light as a really really horribly inefficient and crude design would if it were sucking down 120 watts" Incandescent bulbs aren't even in the discussion, so don't let them fool you by using incandescent equivalent. An incandescent bulb uses that much juice because it pumps out more heat than light - we don't care how much power an incandescent bulb would have used in producing heat - we don't want heat, we want light.