Is the implication is that everything in here is fictional opposed to the political section which is the 'serious' section?
Printable View
Is the implication is that everything in here is fictional opposed to the political section which is the 'serious' section?
Read the sticky at the top or here.
The implication was not intended to be that it is FICTIONAL, but rather that the ideas expressed in here need to be fleshed out better by documented and accepted facts- stories in politics, there's less argument about what actually HAPPENED; it's more about future policy.
I think possibly it's the fact that many of the postings that fall into the "conspiracy" section cannot be proved as true.
And many times the posts are ludacris and/or ridiculous.
That's what I thought. And by comparison everything in the political section is true right? I guess McCain is a good conservative hoping to help us fight 'the war on terror' & Barack Obama is a beacon of hope that's gonna bring us prosperity and 'change'. All totally credible ideas compared to the far out, paranoid suggestion that perhaps these guys & their backers are actually out for their own profit & advancement in worldly power rather than the well being of the people.Quote:
Originally Posted by rebgirl420
I like how there's a rolled eyes face right in the sticky for what the section's about. As if the silly 'official story' of 9/11 is at all credible & has not been ripped to shreads by independent investigations.Quote:
Originally Posted by bhouncy
Okey dokey, this thread has gone from a simple question on site arrangement, which is now answered, to a political discussion on whether opinions on candidates are valid vs. invalid.
CLOSED.