Obama Sponsors Fingerprint Registry Bill

Obama Sponsors Fingerprint Registry Bill

Kurt Nimmo
Infowars
June 9, 2008

Obama and Clinton

It appears Obama and Clinton secretly attended Bilderberg where microchipping the public was on the agenda.


If you want to know what kind of president Barack Obama will be, look no further than his sponsorship of the fingerprint registry bill now wending its way through the Senate. Obama apparently has no reservations when it comes to robbing Americans of their freedom. The corporate media does not believe Obamaâ??s backing of this bill warrants mention, but the Heritage Foundation does:

Sens. Diane Feinstein (D-Calif.) and Mel Martinez (R-Fla.) authored a bill (with 11 co-sponsors, including Sen. Barack Obama) that was incorporated into a housing bill passed by the Senate Banking Committee 19-2 before the Memorial Day recess â?? a bill that creates a national fingerprint registry.

According to a Martinez press release, the language merely â??create[s] national licensing and oversight standards for residential mortgage originators.â?�

One of the standards, John Berlau of the Competitive Enterprise Institute says, may â??require thousands of individuals working even tangentially in the mortgage and real estate industries â?? and not suspected of anything â?? to send their prints to the feds.â?�

This is a step in the wrong direction â?? at least for a nation that preserves freedom.

Democrats such as Dianne Feinstein â?? a member of the globalist Trilateral Commission and also a Bilderberg attendee â?? parade this bill as consumer protection when in fact it is nothing of the sort. In fact, it is rather odd Feinstein would characterize this bill as such when consumers and the public at large were not to allowed to discuss it. Declan McCullagh writes for CNet:

Whatâ??s a little odd is the lack of public discussion about this new fingerprint database. No mention of it appears in the official summary of the revised Senate bill. No fingerprint database requirement is in the House version of the legislation approved earlier this month. No copy of the revised Senate legislation is posted on the Library of Congressâ?? Thomas Web site, which would be the usual procedure.

As McCullagh notes, there is no indication what will happen with the fingerprints after real estate agents have submitted them to the FBI. But this really is a non-brainer â?? they will go into a sprawling government database along with all the other biometric data collected from citizens by the government.

If you want to know the governmentâ??s opinion on fingerprints, look no further than the comments of DHS honcho Michael Chertoff, who recently stated that â??a fingerprint is hardly personal data because you leave it on glasses and silverware and articles all over the world, theyâ??re like footprints. Theyâ??re not particularly private.â?� In other words, you donâ??t own your fingerprints â?? or DNA, for that matter â?? because you leave it around, thus there should be no expectation of privacy.




Obama agrees with this â?? and when, or if, he becomes president he will be no different than the current crop of underwear drawer snooping fascists spying on phone calls, reading email, and rifling through medical and credit records in the name of the â??war on terror,â?� actually a war on the American people.

As Bilderberg researcher and journalist Jim Tucker told Alex Jones today, the elite are itching to impose their control grid on all of us. According to Tuckerâ??s sources inside Bilderberg â?? with a solid track record â?? there was discussion of microchipping the public like so much cattle at the 2008 Bilderberg meeting this past week in Chantilly, Virginia. It will begin with RFID tags in your underwear â?? I kid you not â?? and soon enough progress to implantable microchips.

It now appears both Hillary and Obama secretly attended the Bilderberg meeting, thus we can assume both are all for the agenda to microchip the populace like dogs.

No doubt Obama and the elite believe it is â??Change We Can Believe In.â?�

This is the down side of liberals. They want to help take care of you and make you feel safer but at what cost.:(

I wonder what Obama supporters have to say seeing as how most (notice I did not say all) of them can only regurgitate catch phrases and have no actual substance to back any claims they make.

Change for the better? Yeah right.

Go DEMS!!! :mad: :wtf:

Oh, so this is the change obama is talking about. It looks like we can kiss most everything that makes America great goodbye.

Yes because the country is in SUCH GREAT SHAPE NOW we sure don't want to change things around do we???

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Weedhound

Yes because the country is in SUCH GREAT SHAPE NOW we sure don't want to change things around do we???

---

Exactly, and it just keeps getting better, right?

That may depend on where you are standing. ;) :)

I do not think fingerprinting, DNA registry or microchipping are views from a liberalists' view! In fact, I'd swear it isn't. Not only do realtors have to submit fingerprints to FBI, teachers do, as well, at least at the college level. I quit a job when they asked me for my prints! I thought it sucked and I still do!

Nor, do I subscribe to the theory that if you are at a meeting it means you were for all the agenda in it or you were there for educational purpose's!