"Informal conversation" on Medical Marijuana (AKA More Crap)

"Informal conversation" on medical marijuana

State health officials met with representatives of law enforcement and medicine Monday, another step in their legislatively mandated mission to define the "60-day supply" of marijuana granted in state law to patients with serious health conditions.

The Department of Health allowed about a dozen medical-marijuana advocates, some in wheelchairs and walkers, to listen to the "informal conversation." Some had vowed earlier to disrupt a closed meeting.

The discussion table included invited representatives from police and sheriffs, prosecutors and the American Civil Liberties Union, a lone doctor, a medical-marijuana patient advocate, and the sponsor of the bill mandating a limit.

Although the health department sought public comment in an unusual set of workshops around the state before drafting a rule â?? which will start the clock on a set of formal hearings â?? Gov. Christine Gregoire directed it to seek more comment from law enforcement and the medical community, which were barely represented among the hundreds who spoke at the workshops.

For an hour and a half, the participants wrestled with the task.

"This is a medical decision. It should be determined by physicians," said Don Pierce, executive director of the Washington Association of Sheriffs and Police Chiefs. But the number shouldn't be so big that "anybody involved in cultivation and sale could hide behind it."

Earlier this year, health officials told the governor they planned a limit of 35 ounces and a 100-square-foot growing area.

Dr. Bob Wood, director of the HIV/AIDS Program for Public Health â?? Seattle & King County, said a pack-a-day smoker would use about 4.4 pounds of tobacco in two months. And two months' worth of the HIV/AIDS pills he takes weigh 2.2 pounds.

Setting a medical-marijuana limit is difficult, Wood said, because the health department is seeking a "one size fits all" number, something unusual in medicine.

Sen. Jeanne Kohl Welles, D-Seattle, the limit-setting bill sponsor, said she began her effort after watching her sister-in-law and her best friend die of cancer. "They could take a couple of puffs from a little [marijuana] cigarette, and the nausea would dissipate."

Reluctantly, her in-laws â?? "conservative Republicans" â?? helped their son-in-law buy marijuana on the street. "That's just appalling," she said.

Health officials said they expect to produce a draft by July 1.

Local News | "Informal conversation" on medical marijuana | Seattle Times Newspaper

What Massive Crap. Sen. Jeanne Kohl Welles is a hypocrite.

Whys this upsetting. I wish I could hold 35 ounces and have a 100x100 ft growing area. Legally.

Atleast its slowly grinding forward. I can understand why setting limits could be difficult. But they need to be liberal about the limits. I know people that use a pound a week because they use it in an edible version instead of smoking. And as you become more tolerant it takes more and more as it does with any drug.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SFGurrilla

Whys this upsetting. I wish I could hold 35 ounces and have a 100x100 ft growing area. Legally.

---

1. The womens a hypocrite

2. Barely any medical people were there

3. The whole "limit" thing is just another excuse the government is using to control Medical Marijuana users and non-medical users alike.

Is this 35pounds and 100x100 per medical patient? Was there no limit before? this article was very very broad or im a poor reader.

It would not surprise me if the new law is just as vague as the old law. Hope not. I hope they decide to go with the MPP's report.