-
Wake up America!
What the hell is going on? Are we getting so politically correct we just might as well give up our country tomorrow? Can we not stand up in the face of aggression and actually fight without fear of condemnation of the world?
In Holland a few years ago Muslim exteremist' killed the great-grandson (grand-son) of Vincent-van Gogh, Theo Van Gogh he was a film maker who was critical of Muslim treatment of women.
AMSTERDAM, Netherlands (AP) ?? A filmmaker who was the great-grandnephew of the painter Vincent van Gogh was shot and stabbed to death on an Amsterdam street Tuesday after receiving death threats over a movie he made criticizing the treatment of women under Islam.
Police said Van Gogh's killer shot and stabbed his victim and left a note on his body. They declined to comment on reports that his neck was slashed and would not reveal the contents of the note.
A witness told Dutch Radio 1 the killer arrived by bicycle and shot Van Gogh as he got out of a car. "The shooter stayed next to him and waited. Waited to make sure he was dead," the witness said.
This same religon of peace which is blowing up Mosques in Afghanistan (attempted today but the suicide bomber blew himself up instead, identical to a incident 2 days ago).
Is now undermining everything Allied soldiers have been fighting & dieing for in Iraq and Afghanistan since 9/11 and even before that during the Clinton administration which failed to admit there was a Islamic war on the west.
The "OLD WORLD" where 1 of 4 people were under British Rule, and the great nation of England is now defunct, hell there own people are afraid to walk through certain areas of London which are dominated by the Muslims (I havent been there, just what I have read, so anybody from UK correct me or back me up on this). There was no Iraq in times of history or Iran, just a great huge empire called PERSIA. In 1920 after WW1 the liberalism started to take over and Britain gave up its territorial gains and created these 2 states, I am speaking only of the middle-east at this time.
Saddam Hussein for 36-38 yrs ran Iraq under a cruel monarchy nobody I believe will deny that, and he kept the Shiite' under control with cruel and inhumane methods, with the Suni being the majority.
Today I hear that the government of the new Iraq, which Allied soldiers who have died, dis-membered, wounded, fought, showed bravery above and beyond what was expected has invited the SOB from Iran to their newly liberated country for setting up political tie's, a unification of the Shiite' President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad has won a major victory! As Iran fought with Iraq for years, now after the Allies have fought the battle he is going to go in there and take the spoils.
Speaking of spoils of war, why do we not take oil from Iraq? For all of mankind it has been 'to the victor go the spoils of war' yet once again political correctness has stepped in and it isnt 'feel good' politics to do this, we have gone in there and taken out the dictatorship of Hussein, almost bankrupt our own country and pay out the ass at the pump and home heating fuels. Why not tell the government of Iraq, Hey we saved your ass' from Hussein we are taking some oil to pay for it, same with Mexico with all the illegal aliens coming here consistantly (dont get me started on the news today about the US Marine in Mexico wanted for murder and Mexican authorities would NOT turn him over unless the death penalty was not going to be enforced in his conviction, yet they [Mexican Government] produce fucking comic books showing nationals of their country how to illegally enter USA and not get caught, i.e., dont beat on your g/f as 1 example).
I want Mexican and Iraqi oil to pay for ammeneties that OUR soldiers are being mutilated for, not to watch the bastards in Dubai or Saudi Arabia line their pockets with dollars because they got us by the balls.
Speaking of the balls, why do we not take the oil? Because corporate america does not want it that way!! Too much money is being made by keeping oil at a high price they never had it so good. Gasoline and heating fuel is bringing them massive profits and it is costing the lives of soldiers. Money for blood.
Lets skip across the pond and talk about our other great ally, China! The food poisoning we all experienced during the summer, the lead, sweat shops pumping out inferior goods with no tariffs and under mining our own economy is just another way of giving up the USA to foreign interests.
Does anybody remember a few months ago during PACFLEET the Yuan-class Chinese submarine that surfaced during the middle of maneuvers, right next to 1 of our aircraft carriers? Why is this? I say it is to test our defense systems in preperatioin of a bigger goal.
Parnaoia, ya thats it what do the Chinese want with the USA?
Today a new report from the AirForce times shows a PUBLISHED chinese military plan, everything from silkworms hitting runways in Japan to cripple military planes to a nuclear blast over the pacific wiping out radio communications and also taking out of satellites. I find this the most disturbing thing I have read in a long time, as it has long been said among the military we must keep a watchful eye on China. Here is the article and link.
In a hypothetical future scenario, the U.S. and China are poised to clash ?? likely over Taiwan.
The democratic Republic of China, commonly called Taiwan ?? which America backs and the communist People??s Republic of China considers part of its territory ?? frequently irritates Chinese leaders with calls for greater independence from the mainland. But while the American military mulls its options, Chinese missiles hit runways, fuel lines, barracks and supply depots at U.S. Air Force bases in Japan and South Korea. Long-range warheads destroy American satellites, crippling Air Force surveillance and communication networks. A nuclear fireball erupts high above the Pacific Ocean, ionizing the atmosphere and scrambling radars and radio feeds.
This is China??s anti-U.S. sucker punch strategy.
It??s designed to strike America??s military suddenly, stunning and stalling the Air Force more than any other service. In a script written by Chinese military officers and defense analysts, a bruised U.S. military, beholden to a sheepish American public, puts up a small fight before slinking off to avoid full-on war.
This strategic outlook isn??t hidden in secret Chinese documents. It??s printed in China??s military journals and textbooks. And for much of last year, Mandarin literates and defense experts ?? working for the Santa Monica, Calif.-based Rand Corp. on an Air Force contract ?? combed through a range of Chinese military sources.
They emerged with ??Entering the Dragon??s Lair,? a lengthy report on how the Chinese People??s Liberation Army would likely confront the U.S. military and how the Air Force in particular can brace itself. In many cases, the theoretical enemy nation China??s officers discuss in these scenarios isn??t explicitly named but is unmistakably the U.S.
??These aren??t war plans,? said report co-author Roger Cliff, a former Defense Department strategist and China military specialist who spoke to Air Force Times from Taiwan. ??This is the military talking to itself. It??s not designed for foreigners or even China??s general public to read.?
Element of surprise
When it comes to conflict with the U.S., Chinese military analysts favor age-old schoolyard wisdom: Throw the first punch and hit hard.
??Future conflicts are likely to be short, intense affairs that might consist of a single campaign,? Cliff said. ??They??re thinking about ways to get the drop on us. Most of our force is not forward-deployed.?
China??s experts concede its army would lose a head-on fight, with one senior colonel comparing such a scenario to ??throwing an egg against a rock.? Instead, the Chinese would attempt what Rand calls an ??anti-access? strategy: slowing the deployment of U.S. forces to the Pacific theater, damaging operations within the region and forcing the U.S. to fight from a distance.
??Taking the enemy by surprise,? one Chinese military expert wrote, ??would catch it unprepared and cause confusion within and huge psychological pressure on the enemy and help [China] win relatively large victories at relatively small costs.? Another military volume suggests feigning a large-scale military training exercise to conceal the attack??s buildup.
The Dragon??s Lair
Striking U.S. air bases ?? specifically command-and-control facilities, aircraft hangars and surface-to-air missile launchers ?? would be China??s first priority if a conflict arose, according to Rand??s report.
U.S. facilities in South Korea and Japan, even far-south Okinawa, sit within what Rand calls the ??Dragon??s Lair?: a swath of land and sea along China??s coast. This is an area reachable by cruise missiles, jet-borne precision bombs and local covert operatives. Air Force bases within this area include Osan and Kunsan in South Korea, as well as Misawa, Yokota and Kadena in Japan. And in a conflict over Taiwan, any nation allowing ??an intervening superpower? such as the U.S. to operate inside its territory can expect a Chinese attack, according to China??s defense experts.
China is designing ground-launched cruise missiles capable of nailing targets more than 900 miles away ?? well within striking range of South Korea and much of Japan, according to the report. Cruise missiles able to reach Okinawa ?? home to Kadena Air Base ?? are in development.
The Chinese would first launch ??concentrated and unexpected? attacks on tarmacs using runway-penetrating missiles and, soon after, would target U.S. aircraft. Saboteurs would play a role in reconnaissance, harassing operations and even ??assassinating key personnel,? according to another military expert.
Chinese fighter jets would scramble to intercept aerial refueling tankers and cargo planes sent to shuttle in fuel, munitions, supplies or troops. High-explosive cluster bombs would target pilot quarters and other personnel buildings.
Because the American public is ??abnormally sensitive? about military casualties, according to an article in China??s Liberation Army Daily, killing U.S. airmen or other personnel would spark a ??domestic anti-war cry? on the home front and possibly force early withdrawal of U.S. forces. (??The U.S. experience in Somalia is usually cited in support of this assertion,? according to the Rand report.) Once this hard-and-fast assault on U.S. bases commenced, the Chinese army would ??swiftly divert? its forces and ??guard vigilantly against enemy retaliation,? according to a Chinese expert.
Dumb and blind The PLA also would likely use less conventional attacks on the American military??s vital communications network. The goal, as one Chinese expert put it: leaving U.S. combat capabilities ??blind,? ??deaf? and ??paralyzed.?
Losing early-warning systems designed to detect incoming missiles would be, for the Air Force, the most devastating setback ?? one that could force the service to exit the region altogether, according to Rand.
China could also launch a nuclear ??e-bomb,? or electromagnetic explosive, that would fry U.S. communication equipment while ionizing the atmosphere for minutes to hours, according to the report. This would likely jam radio signals in a 900-mile diameter beneath the nuclear fireball.
The PLA could also employ long-range anti-satellite missiles ?? similar to one successfully tested last January ?? to destroy one or more American satellites. However, the PLA has a host of less dramatic options: short-range jammers hidden in suitcases or bombs and virus attacks on Air Force computer networks.
U.S. Air Force options
Shielding against a swift Chinese onslaught is, according to Rand, as simple as reinforcing a runway or as complex as cloaking the orbit of military satellites.
In the short term, U.S. air bases inside the Dragon??s Lair should add an extra layer of concrete to their runways and bury fuel tanks underground. All aircraft, the report said, should be parked in hardened shelters, especially fighter jets.
Parking larger aircraft ?? bombers, tankers and E-3 Sentry Airborne Warning and Control Systems jets ?? in hard-shell hangars would be expensive and difficult but likely worth the cost, according to the report.
U.S. fighter jets remain the best defense against incoming Chinese missile attacks. But, given China??s taste for sudden attacks, surface-launched missile defense systems must be installed long before a conflict roils. Because the PLA is expected to strike quickly, the report said, waiting for the first tremors of conflict is not an option.
The Air Force also should fortify itself against Chinese hackers by using software encryption, isolating critical computer systems and preparing contingency plans to communicate without a high-bandwidth network. Though China maintains a ??no first use? nuclear bomb policy, the U.S., according to Rand, should warn China that nuclear electromagnetic pulse attacks will be considered acts of nuclear aggression and could prompt nuclear retaliation.
Rand insists the Air Force must defend satellites ?? which support communication, reconnaissance, bomb guidance and more ?? against China??s proven satellite-killing missiles. This could be accomplished in the Cold War tradition of mutually assured destruction by threatening to retaliate in kind if the PLA blasts U.S. satellites.
??That might be the one restraining factor,? Cliff said. ??They might not want to start that space war.?
Or, Rand suggests, the U.S. could invest heavily in satellite protection or evasion techniques, including stealth, blending in with other satellite constellations or perhaps developing and deploying microsatellites capable of swarming to defend larger satellites, which the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency is working toward.
Could this really happen? The Chinese first-strike strategy is ??more than hypothetical,? according to the report. But in the near term, at least, it??s considered unlikely.
If the most contentious issue is Taiwan, Cliff said, then the likely trigger would be Taiwanese elections, where assertions of complete independence from the mainland can infuriate Chinese leaders. China??s current president, Hu Jintao, has built up China??s military but also its ties with America. In 2012, however, when Taiwan holds an election and mainland China??s leadership is expected to turn over, perhaps for the worse, the risk of conflict could increase.
??It really depends on the circumstances,? Cliff said. ??Would Taiwan be the provocateur? If so, it might be hard for the American public to support intervention.?
However, if China moves to capture control of the island, Cliff said he believes the U.S. would face a rocky dilemma.
??Are we really going to let a small, democratic country get snuffed out by a huge authoritarian country ?? especially when you think about how our own country came into existence?? Cliff said.
As China pours more resources into its evolving and expanding military, it buys the power to more strongly assert itself against America. In November, China denied U.S. Navy minesweepers shelter from a storm and, in another incident that month, turned down an Air Force C-17 flight shuttling supplies to the American consulate in Hong Kong. Experts speculate this was a rebuff to American arms sales to Taiwan, as well as President Bush??s autumn meeting with the Dalai Lama, the exiled spiritual leader of another state China claims, Tibet.
??If this conflict happened today, I??m certain we??d prevail,? Cliff said. ??But as time goes on, that??s not a given.?
LINK: Hypothetical attack on U.S. outlined by China - Air Force News, opinions, editorials, news from Iraq, photos, reports - Air Force Times
Enough of China, back to Britain
London dentist Sohail Qureshi told the police he was just off to celebrate the Muslim festival of Eid with his family in Pakistan?
But instead of dental floss and fluoride, Qureshi, 30, tried to board a plane at Heathrow Airport with $18,000 in cash, a night vision scope, two metal batons, terror handbooks, extremist material, military information on CDs and medical supplies.
FOXNews.com - Al Qaeda's Dentist - International News | News of the World | Middle East News | Europe News
Or is the link from Fox news right wing propaganda for blood?
Muslim honor killings, shit in New York not long ago a father, killed his 2 teenage daughters because they were becoming westernized, they would not wear the Islamic clothing to school, as they would change into western style dress once leaving their house, the father of these 2 girls, killed them, stuffed the bodies into a trunk and fled the country.
Even the 3 little pigs, remember that story we all grew up with? taught us to read and we went to sleep with it? Hell I hear t hat iin England they are stopping print of that story in schools as not to offend Muslims!!! (Again somebody in UK correct/confirm this if I am wrong).
Hell, cannibis.com I have been drinking my favorite liquid poison (Bacardi Black) and am rambling, this should probably not be here but on instead on craigs list Rants & Raves. But what the hell.
And Bono advisint the pentagon on Africa? WTF!!!!!!!
I can go on and on but why get banned.
bahhh
At least I live in USA where I can speak whats on my drunk ass mind and not get a bullet in the back of my skull like alot of other countries.
1 more drink! heh
:rastasmoke::rastasmoke::rastasmoke::rastasmoke::r astasmoke:
