Is it just me or was I too stoned when I saw the movie Without A Paddle because to me it switches from scene to scene real fast and makes no send, bad acting...
Printable View
Is it just me or was I too stoned when I saw the movie Without A Paddle because to me it switches from scene to scene real fast and makes no send, bad acting...
My brother mentioned to me that this movie is the new benchmark for horrible flicks.
OTOH, I heard from someone else that it was the funniest movie last year.
Neither opinion will make me want to watch it, simply because it looked shitty in the first place.
yeah i heard it was really really funny but also heard that i was like my dog with a big cancerous lump on its nuts...looks funny but is actually really bad..
The guy who plays steve-o in SLC Punk is in it. That's about the only reason I'd consider seeing it. Looks dumb.
its actually pretty good, just make sure you stay stoned through the whole movie and you will laugh other then that id rather go watch harold and kumar go to white castle
lol that was suppose to be my post i was accidently still signed in on my gfs name from yesterday whoops!!^^
i found this one funnier than harold and kumar.
I disagree 100%. Harold and Kumar is one of the most genius movies in quite sometime. To say the least, Without a Paddle sucked balls... large, hairy, transvestite balls.... I was stoned watching the whole thing... and I thought it sucked ass..... One of the worst movies i've seen all year... I'm sticking with Harold and Kumar...Quote:
Originally Posted by STP
yeah its a pretty good movie. I laughed a few times. Worth a rent
i felt both movies sucked. harold and kumar is so overrated and unfunny. i think dude wheres my car was better. Not another teen movie is just about the only movie i actually laughed at. everything else sucks especially all the over-rated ones like zoolander, dodgeball, and all adam sandler movies. sandler sucks.Quote:
Originally Posted by Bman719