CNN/YouTube Republican debate tonight

Watch it! 8pm EST, CNN :thumbsup:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Zimzum

Watch it! 8pm EST, CNN :thumbsup:

---

Does anyone else think that there have been some weird subjects?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by epxroot

Does anyone else think that there have been some weird subjects?

---

Like Ron's first question about NAU "conspiracies"? :mad:

I did a little YouTube lookup during this debate to see just how disproportionate the questions have been.

YouTube search result hits:

1. "Ron Paul" 56,800
2. "Mitt Romney" 3,420
3. "Rudy Giuliani" 3,290
4. "John McCain" 2,500
5. "Mike Huckabee" 1,290
6. "Duncan Hunter" 864
7. "Tom Tancredo" 632

The media will do what they need to hopefully catch Ron Paul where they want him. I hope he is at least the next VP.

What the hell, non of the annalist after the debate mentioned ron paul really much they would mostly comment the other candidates and talk down on paull.

Replay is on now........

Have a good one!:s4:

I'm so sick of the hecklers that attend these biased staged performances. How disgusting that people interrupt candidates the way they have been. They must have been paid good to do it.

Ron Paul is unbeatable in debates. I love it. :thumbsup:

Giuliani was booed at by some gun nuts because he spoke in favor of an intelligent approach to firearms licensing, and they want no regulation at all.

I think the last nights debate was at the most, a few strokes above par. I was rather disappointed with some of the questions that were allowed to be asked. Like the bible and baseball question these questions took up a lot of time that could have been used towards better questions, and could have given more floor time to some of the candidates. Over all I was disappointed with this debate, or maybe my expectations were a little to high when I thought about questions from real people. Anyone else have any comments on how this debate ranked?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by epxroot

Like the bible and baseball question these questions took up a lot of time that could have been used towards better questions, and could have given more floor time to some of the candidates. Over all I was disappointed with this debate, or maybe my expectations were a little to high when I thought about questions from real people. Anyone else have any comments on how this debate ranked?

---

Couldn't agree more with ya....also, you'd think the moderator there would have pinned them down a bit harder on the actual questions instead of letting them talk their way around them.

Have a good one!:s4: