Printable View
Simple enough question, I'm just curious as to most women's asthetic preferrence. Lets not turn this into a circumethics debate please, somehow those get even angrier than the religious and political ones:wtf:.
We're also assuming that cleanliness isn't an issue. That's gotta be one of the biggest bullshit myths that uncut guys are "unclean". I'm not cut and I keep everything 100% clean all the time, it really takes no effort to wash it with everything else.
So my good stoner chicks, opinions?
I worry a heck of a lot more about the person behind the penis, frankly. If I were single, I'd be choosing according to the guy and not whether or not he's been cut. My husband is circumcized because that was the fashion when he was born. We elected not to circumcize our son. I don't know any ladies who choose for or against a guy based on circumcision. If any of them do, I don't think that speaks well of those ladies.
Damnit! I forgot the "doesn't matter either way" option. Ah well....
You're quite right birdgirl, but I've seriously heard girls say "EEWWW! That's so gross if they're not cut, I'd never touch that!" :rolleyes:
I figure you circumcised guys must be in the US, because everywhere here doctors won't do it to babies, and even in the UK it's not covered by the Health.
So if you're from anywhere from Spain to Korea, and circumcised, you're bound to get a lot of questions...
One of my friends from the US came to visit me, and he said that they all thought it was cool, only that the ones who thought it was cool weren't females.
Not all females think it's cool. It's just that they've been fooled by our foreskin-unfriendly American culture into thinking that circumcized is the only proper way for a guy to look. I'd be much more apt, if it were a matter of choice based on the penis alone instead of the person, to choose an unadulterated, uncircumcized guy because that's the way he's really meant to be, with all those nerve endings intact for his pleasure and mine.
Who says "looks" are the sole reason behind the practice? If I took that approach towards women, keeping it natural as it were, how would it look upon me to label others as fools just because they prefer artificially augmented ears, noses, chins, lips, cheeks,... ?Quote:
It's just that they've been fooled by our foreskin-unfriendly American culture into thinking that circumcized is the only proper way for a guy to look.
Which is why I agree with your previous statement of the guy behind the tool being vastly more important in an adult relationship than the tool itself.
I guess I just don't share the view of nature, and by proxy the human anatomy, being absolutely perfect in every way. The way I see it, if our eyes, knees, and backs have design flaws then I don't see why a penis can't.
Nature saw fit to give the majority of us wisdom teeth, yet we remove them to make our lives easier all the time. That's not fashion, that's pragmatism.
I thought women liked uncircumcised cuz it FELT better. has nothing to do with 'looks' or 'aesthetic appearance'.
what actually matters anyway is how it feels and not just how it looks.
You need to read what I wrote again. Twice, if necessary. I didn't by any means say looks were the reason behind the practice of circumcision itself. Nor did anyone else. You might want to revisit the suject of this poll, too, so you can see how my statement followed that.Quote:
Originally Posted by BlueDevil
I said looks, because they're what women have seen most often in pictures and American culture, are what are likely behind many women's preference for circumcized men as romantic partners.
There's a big difference my statement and your misinterpretation of it. BIG.
I'm not cut and girls usually compliment me on my penis' looks and hygiene.
Certain "expierenced" girls have told me that they prefer a circumcized penis because some guy's foreskin isn't as clean as mine.. then again, girls have told me my penis is normal looking and that there are very nasty looking penises...cut or not.
i think it's all about your hygiene.
I'm surprised by the lack of female respondants to the poll...:wtf: