Tony Blair could still be charged with war crimes
"Former SNP MP Jim Sillars has called for Tony Blair to be charged in Scotland with war crimes."
"He believes that the necessary powers to arrest and charge Mr Blair exist in Scotland, and has called on the Lord Advocate to investigate.
Mr Sillars said there is ??overwhelming evidence? that Mr Blair is guilty of conspiracy to wage and of waging aggressive war."
Jim Sillars carries the War Crimes fight to the Scottish courts » BEPJ - Blog Archive
Tony Blair could still be charged with war crimes
They need to indite Bush-Cheney first, Blair was only their lap-dog.
Tony Blair could still be charged with war crimes
Ok so what the hell are they charging him with? That article was just way to vague, charging him with "conspiracy to wage and of waging aggressive war". An outright declaration of war isn't exactly a "conspiracy", so what are they leaving out?
Tony Blair could still be charged with war crimes
They are not trying to charge him with conspiring to wage war, he's hopefully going to be tried for actually waging war, an illegal war.
Tony Blair could still be charged with war crimes
Quote:
Originally Posted by Staurm
They are not trying to charge him with conspiring to wage war, he's hopefully going to be tried for actually waging war, an illegal war.
While I still strongly disagree with the Iraq war, on legal grounds couldn't they justify the invasion with Saddam's blatant human rights violations?
Tony Blair could still be charged with war crimes
Quote:
Originally Posted by mrdevious
While I still strongly disagree with the Iraq war, on legal grounds couldn't they justify the invasion with Saddam's blatant human rights violations?
Not to mention breaking 17 U.N. resolutions!
Have a good one!:s4:
Tony Blair could still be charged with war crimes
last time it was a matter of morality, everyone claiming that the war in viet nam was immoral. these days everyone thinks they're a lawyer so they're claiming the war in iraq is illegal. a little knowledge is a dangerous thing, but the illusion of knowledge is both dangerous and laughable.
Tony Blair could still be charged with war crimes
If I was the UN in 2003, I'd be reluctant to grant America any kind of resolute backing for an aggressive war, owing to the fact they usually invariably make a complete and utter balls up of the thing. America (and Britain) are in no position to be assuming the role of the worlds police.
Tony Blair could still be charged with war crimes
Quote:
Originally Posted by Staurm
If I was the UN in 2003, I'd be reluctant to grant America any kind of resolute backing for an aggressive war, owing to the fact they usually invariably make a complete and utter balls up of the thing. America (and Britain) are in no position to be assuming the role of the worlds police.
Well I surely agree with you, and to add to that, we can't afford it. The debacle in Iraq isn't bad enough, the war hawks are trying to go after Iran. I guess when the whole middle east is a smoking hole, they'll be satisfied. How dare them to want control of their oil.
Tony Blair could still be charged with war crimes
Quote:
Originally Posted by mrdevious
While I still strongly disagree with the Iraq war, on legal grounds couldn't they justify the invasion with Saddam's blatant human rights violations?
The United States has imprisoned somewhere in the vicinity of 30% of the young black males in our country, most of them for non-violent drug offenses. When is someone going to invade the U.S. for our human rights violations?