Slogans: Their real role in politics

As human beings living in the commercial ridden 21st Century, we love slogans. Everything needs to have a slogan, every product, food, movie advert, website, if it doesn't have that catchy one-liner, it just ain't top quality. That's just the way it is.

The problem is, over the last few years, this petty requirement of iconic status has manifested itself in the political world. Let's just take a look at the STILL thrown around 'war on terror' phrase. I could say it has lost all meaning following the grim and ever more public reality of the Iraq war, but then that would be to say it ever had meaning in the first place. What is the 'war on terror' exactly? Noone knows for sure, it's just a phrase. You could call it the the war against terrorism, but then that could mean anything? The 'war on terror' only applies to terrorism in the middle East. What about terrorism at home? Terrorism in any other parts of the world? Politicians attempt to relate drug trafficking to terrorism. So 'war on terror' suddenly means 'war on drug users', which make up a large majority of the US and UK, including the ever increasing casual users of cocaine, ecstasy and of course, maryjane.

The thing is, 'war on terror', which could very easily be the title of some 1950's B-movie, is nothing but a mere slogan to connote fear when placed within any political narrative put forth by our world leaders. In much the same way as those magical numbers '9/11' (way to piss on those people's memory), throwing the words 'war on terror' into the equation was always and still is Bush's main method of reasoning for most of his bullshit, even for subjects that could not be further from the phrase's supposed meaning (anyone speaking out against Bush or his strategies, in his eyes, helps terrorists, therefore they are a terrorist, therefore they are included in the 'war on terror'). The reality of this methodical manipulation of the masses is becoming more and more apparent as the failures of the past 8 years follow suit and the 'war on terror' becomes less and less as straightforward as Bush's "ultimate strategy" may have suggested (kill 'em all and go home, war on terror baby).

But that's not to say anyone really cares. Many candidates for the next election have had their own witty slogans written for them as a means of gaining popularity, as well as multiple myspace, facebook and youtube accounts, now THATS 21st Century politics for ya. :thumbsup:

My point is the Iraq war has shown just how dangerous a well placed slogan can be. Post 9/11, Bush was able to coax the majority of the country into fear just by chucking the same words into every speech. To suggest that three words are able to summarise the moral issues of an immensely complex and increasingly fragile conflict that has been brewing for decades is ignorance in itself, yet the majority have shown themselves to prefer such bliss.

When ya got a group of people like Al-Queda that flys no flag recongnized by any country they are terrorists and the "War on Terror" is just that. I'd even consider including in these gang bangers on that but the dems would have a shit fit if we were to into and area like East L.A. and do a ritious clean-up.

I hear ya about the slogans though........I'm waiting for "Rudy Can't Fail" bumper stickers myself.....LOL

Have a good one!:s4:

B.Basher, I think you've got a handle on it my friend. Too bad others can't see through the smokescreens thrown up By the Bush Regime. I never knew how many stupid motherfuckers were in this country untill the '04' election, when the idiots re-elected the stupidest president we've ever had. That was an eye opener for me. In a Democracy, the majority vote wins, even if the voters are idiots and that was definently the case here. After 4 frickin years of this asshole they went down the fear road and got sucked into the void, yeah he's great, he'll protect you,~LOL~. Then why are the borders wide open, why are the ports unprotected, why are the nuclear plants and chemical plants unprotected, and on and on. Bush will go down in history as the worst president in the history of the united states. His latest deal is to give 20 million illegal aliens amnesty and add them to the social security roles, reward them for breaking the law, the net result will be 100 million mexicans coming to America, because they can bring their relatives in from mexico once they are legal, whoopee, now every one can work for minimum wage, I'm just glad I'm old enough that I'll be dead before they run out of social security money, but my kids and grandkids are in for shitty times.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by medicinal

but my kids and grandkids are in for shitty times.

---

If all goes right they very well could be sitting sweet! So did ya recieve your package yet?

Have a good one!:s4:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by medicinal

Too bad others can't see through the smokescreens thrown up By the Bush Regime.

---

baby bush and company may be one of the most outstanding perpetrators of the dumbing down of american politics in recent years, but both sides are guilty of aiming far too low and they always have been.

"baby bush and company may be one of the most outstanding perpetrators of the dumbing down of american politics in recent years, but both sides are guilty of aiming far too low and they always have been."

Except Bush was elected. The democrats, as much as you love to hate them, have very little mention in my original post for the obvious reason they had nothing to do with it. Try thinking outside the box instead of conforming to the "two sides war" delusion.