French judge warns of terror threat

[Psycho4Bud]

NEW YORK - The risk of terror attacks in Europe is high and is increasing, France's leading anti-terrorism judge said, warning that a recent alliance between al-Qaida and a North African terrorist group poses a grave threat.

The Salafist Group for Call and Combat, known by its French initials GSPC, staged seven nearly simultaneous attacks in Algeria on Tuesday, targeting police in several towns east of Algiers, killing six and injuring around 30, according to officials, police and hospital staff.

Al-Qaida in Islamic North Africa, the new name for the GSPC, claimed responsibility for the strikes.

"The GSPC wants to carry out attacks in Europe, especially in France, Italy and Spain, and destabilize North Africa," Jean-Louis Bruguiere told The Associated Press on Tuesday night in New York.
French judge warns of terror threat - Yahoo! News (http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070214/ap_on_re_us/us_europe_terrorism_threat)

Al-Qaida at it again.........I wonder if the French have access to Prisonplanet? LOL

Have a good one!:jointsmile:

[delusionsofNORMALity]

i sometimes think it would be better to play their game. the systematic execution of the leaders of all violence prone countries and organizations would be far more effective than the massive troop movements we are using at the moment. in our attempt to hold ourselves to a higher standard, we keep walking into one trap after another and expending resources better spent on our own citizens. though it may not seem like the honorable thing to do, it might just be the only logical way to proceed.

it would be terrorism taken to the next level. instead of tossing bombs into a frightened population it would be their leaders who would pay the price for aggression. the first logical step would be the execution of "baby bush" on the white house lawn, a symbolic act to show our determination to rid the world of all those who would use violence against their neighbors. there are any number of candidates for the next in line, but the obvious choices would be in the middle east and across south-east asia.

this could not be politically driven, friend and foe alike would be assessed for their peaceful intentions and dealt with as their deeds required. war is an outdated concept in our present circumstances and armies are useless against ideologies. we shouldn't be using a club to rid ourselves of this cancer when a scalpel is close at hand.


maybe i'm just tired of the prattling of ignorant minds (mine included)

[Kid Dynamite]

i sometimes think it would be better to play their game. the systematic execution of the leaders of all violence prone countries and organizations would be far more effective than the massive troop movements we are using at the moment. in our attempt to hold ourselves to a higher standard, we keep walking into one trap after another and expending resources better spent on our own citizens. though it may not seem like the honorable thing to do, it might just be the only logical way to proceed.

it would be terrorism taken to the next level. instead of tossing bombs into a frightened population it would be their leaders who would pay the price for aggression. the first logical step would be the execution of "baby bush" on the white house lawn, a symbolic act to show our determination to rid the world of all those who would use violence against their neighbors. there are any number of candidates for the next in line, but the obvious choices would be in the middle east and across south-east asia.

this could not be politically driven, friend and foe alike would be assessed for their peaceful intentions and dealt with as their deeds required. war is an outdated concept in our present circumstances and armies are useless against ideologies. we shouldn't be using a club to rid ourselves of this cancer when a scalpel is close at hand.


maybe i'm just tired of the prattling of ignorant minds (mine included)

never a truer word spoken.

[Breukelen advocaat]

We should have surgically eliminated the Taliban and al Quada in Afghanistan, right after 9/11. Unfortunately, the word "should" does not help after the fact.

[medicinal]

the first logical step would be the execution of "baby bush" on the white house lawn, a symbolic act to show our determination to rid the world of all those who would use violence against their neighbors. Now there's an honest evaluation of the steps necessary to rid the world of terrorists. We start with the #1 terrorist, GW Bush!

[delusionsofNORMALity]

Now there's an honest evaluation of the steps necessary to rid the world of terrorists. We start with the #1 terrorist, GW Bush!

misguided (yes), a buffoon (certainly), a terrorist (?). even if he could be labeled a terrorist, there are quite a few who are higher on the list. he just happens to be close at hand and highly visible. what act would better symbolize our nonpartisan desire for peace than sacrificing our own commander in chief.

this campaign against violence would be best left to an international authority, but .... the un is hopelessly entangled in its own corruption and ineptitude, the world court is an impotent laughingstock, the g8 is a special interest group by its very nature and the eu is too concerned with holding itself together to see beyond its own petty needs. all of the international options are either compromised by their own vicious stupidity or mired in economic self-absorption, so if the us must begin this campaign alone then what better way to start than sacrificing one of our own.