PDA

View Full Version : Easier to roll: joint or blunt?



jakez
02-08-2007, 02:53 AM
I've never rolled either but I'm trying to roll a blueberry juicy jay and I am about to kill someone.

orange floyd
02-08-2007, 03:27 AM
i think its easier to roll a nice blunt than a joint, because if you roll the inner leaf of a blunt too loose, you can jsut make the outer leaf tight, and cover up any rips. with a joint, its harder to get it tight with only one paper.

dankman
02-08-2007, 06:14 AM
yah blunts are easier for me because theyre not so delicate

FreeVenice
02-08-2007, 06:22 AM
Ya blunts are deff. easyer. but rolling a J is like riding a bike. Once you get it down you got it. . . . You can always buy a pre-rolled blunt/joint. Cones are nice.

Oh F Yeah
02-08-2007, 06:24 AM
Old school here, boys. I would rather smoke from a thin rice paper and enjoy the natural fragrances anyday. Yes...it does does take practice, but "back in the day" (lol), we old timers didn't know what a blunt was.

J-dubb206
02-08-2007, 09:07 PM
Id say joints are easier. But i prefer a nice fat blunt.

LIP
02-08-2007, 10:18 PM
Im old school so i'd say joint, but only because i seem to be one of only few people on this site who can get it to burn for ages. Blunts are fairly easy too... for me neither of them is difficult, or more difficult than the other.

orangeman
02-08-2007, 10:21 PM
Blunts are easier for me but I swear I wanna learn how to make a slow burning joint. LIP you need to teach me the way, I know you probably roll the best joint ever :D!

LIP
02-08-2007, 10:24 PM
Blunts are easier for me but I swear I wanna learn how to make a slow burning joint. LIP you need to teach me the way, I know you probably roll the best joint ever :D!

I keep trying to get my mate to bring his phone AND the wire to get the pics on the computer, i could do a tutorial now but i really want good pics. Cos my cams shit i've only EVER got shit pics and to do a tutorial properly i gotta have good pics that arnt blurred. But i will do it eventually. I'll definatly do it!

orangeman
02-08-2007, 10:26 PM
I keep trying to get my mate to bring his phone AND the wire to get the pics on the computer, i could do a tutorial now but i really want good pics. Cos my cams shit i've only EVER got shit pics and to do a tutorial properly i gotta have good pics that arnt blurred. But i will do it eventually. I'll definatly do it!

Right on cuz I'm tired of rollin joints that burn fast lol. I want one that lasts at least 7 mins.

LIP
02-08-2007, 10:28 PM
Right on cuz I'm tired of rollin joints that burn fast lol. I want one that lasts at least 7 mins.

I'd get it to last 30 mins minimum, maybe even as long as mine. Obviously it'd be easier face to face but i'll try my best.

Next time im on msn i'll have to have a chat with ya! :rastasmoke: :rastasmoke:

notransfer
02-08-2007, 10:28 PM
j is easier in my opinion...once you have a style you almost cant fuck up

notransfer
02-08-2007, 10:30 PM
lip i have a q..does it burn/stay lit for 30 mins...or is it like take a hit every min or two for thirty mins but you gotta keep relightling (i dont even know why im asking)lol

i feel like i know what youre going to say

LIP
02-08-2007, 10:36 PM
No, no relighting. It'd taste like shit lol.

The idea is to get the joint to ember when your not smoking it, but not so much that it makes smoke. Sounds stupid dont it? It's still on fire but no smoke? Well, belive it or not it IS possible, that way the joint doesnt go out and you dont waste any weed or smoke. That's why the "Joints waste weed" thing is a pile of shit as far as im concerned. It may not work every time, but i can get it to work 90% of the time, so it's something that can be done again and again.

Most of my joints are between 30 and 45 minutes, most of them closer to 45.

Some people think im lying.. some dont. The ones that do are just jealous because they cant do it, and the ones who belive me can do it too... so im not the only one!

And no, it's taking a puff almost constantly. Not every 2 seconds, but im not in the habbit of couting between puffs. I guess it could be condiered slighter faster than you'd smoke a cig.

The idea isnt to smoke it slow, it's to roll it so you can smoke it and let it burn slow.

Also my joints have the english version of a roach, the bit of card. I find that because it opens the end of the joint up you can pull ALOT more smoke through and get massive massive hits.

The trick is to now how tight to roll it without rolling it so tight it goes out or you cant pull anything through. That's why it's hard to exlain in picutes, but damnit, i'll try.

rantingsweed
02-08-2007, 10:39 PM
i can roll joints easier, cone shaped ones and have no problem with rolling them tightly

orange floyd
02-08-2007, 11:55 PM
No, no relighting. It'd taste like shit lol.

The idea is to get the joint to ember when your not smoking it, but not so much that it makes smoke. Sounds stupid dont it? It's still on fire but no smoke? Well, belive it or not it IS possible, that way the joint doesnt go out and you dont waste any weed or smoke. That's why the "Joints waste weed" thing is a pile of shit as far as im concerned. It may not work every time, but i can get it to work 90% of the time, so it's something that can be done again and again.

Most of my joints are between 30 and 45 minutes, most of them closer to 45.

Some people think im lying.. some dont. The ones that do are just jealous because they cant do it, and the ones who belive me can do it too... so im not the only one!

And no, it's taking a puff almost constantly. Not every 2 seconds, but im not in the habbit of couting between puffs. I guess it could be condiered slighter faster than you'd smoke a cig.

The idea isnt to smoke it slow, it's to roll it so you can smoke it and let it burn slow.

Also my joints have the english version of a roach, the bit of card. I find that because it opens the end of the joint up you can pull ALOT more smoke through and get massive massive hits.

The trick is to now how tight to roll it without rolling it so tight it goes out or you cant pull anything through. That's why it's hard to exlain in picutes, but damnit, i'll try.

i think it has a lot to do with how much bud you put in them. 2g seems to be the amount ive noticed that you say are in your joints.

for me, .3-.7 tops in a joint, unless i feel like doin something crazy. any more than that and i put it in a blunt.

peaceandlove420
02-09-2007, 05:45 AM
I tried rolling a joint for the first time last week. It worked and I smoked it . Since then I have been 6/6. They get better everytime, the last one being perfert imho. Shaped like a baseball bat lol. I will never use a piece again if I can keep pullin these off.

I am a natural I guess? I always here joints are hard to roll. Came naturally to me. Is this wierd?

and of course I studied others rolling techniques. I had my buddy guide me through my first one verbally.

Chronic.Tonic
02-09-2007, 05:57 AM
Joints are way easier to roll if you can. 2g cones rule