PDA

View Full Version : War on Drugs Costly



Markass
02-06-2007, 08:55 PM
This Saturday, I had the privilege of turning the ripe old age of 18. The United States Constitution now grants me the right to join the military and vote for every representative in public office.

I am now a legal adult in the state of Texas, which grants me the right to smoke cigarettes. Fortunately, through the effort of my parents and hundreds of hours of after school programming, I have found myself to be impervious to the urge of smoking.

According to the Center for Disease Control, "Each year in the United States, approximately 440,000 persons die of a cigarette smoking-attributable illness, resulting in 5.6 million years of potential life lost, $75 billion in direct medical costs, and $82 billion in lost productivity." The Surgeon General warns that the use of tobacco causes cancer of the mouth and throat, even if you do not inhale; it can cause lung cancer and heart disease; it can also increase the risk of infertility, stillbirth and low birth weight.

Despite the fact that one of the state goals of our government is protection of the people, it still finds it fit to allow the sale and distribution of such a harmful product.

The government allows people to slowly kill themselves because cigarettes, and the tobacco trade, are an essential part of the American economy.

The United States has spent billions of taxpayers' dollars on The War on Drugs. Since the late 1960's, propaganda chronicling the noble effort of the Drug Enforcement Agency has been shoved down Americans' throats.

In the early 1960's, recreational drugs, including marijuana, became fashionable among young, white, middle class Americans. During this time, drug use became representative of protest and social rebellion in the era's atmosphere of political unrest.

In order to put to rest the sentiment against what seemed to be the entirety of the youth, in 1968 the Beureau of Narcotics and Dangerous Drugs was created.

Over the past 40 years, the War on Drugs has been waged on the streets of our country. The question that remains is what this war has actually accomplished.

The Office of National Drug Control Policy outlined that "in 2003 alone, over 19 billion dollars were spent on the war on drugs." From 2003 to 2004, drug use and trafficking decreased by less than one percent. According to drugwarfacts.org, 786,545 marijuana-related arrests were made in 2005, the majority of which resulted in minor possession charges. The cost of keeping an average offender in prison is $160 a day or $58,000 annually.

What benefit is this providing for our country?

Statistics show that during the past 40 years, the DEA has had no effect on the fluctuation of drug-related crime.

The agency has put forth the same effort during the highs and lows of the drug market; and though they were accredited for the low, they were unable to prevent the high.

One of the primary targets of the drug war is use and sale of marijuana. Even though marijuana, untainted with other substances, produces fewer risks than a cigarette, the government continues to allow the sale of cigarettes and continues to arrest those who use or sell marijuana. According to the Surgeon General, the chronic use of marijuana presents less harm than the chronic use of cigarettes. Over 4 billion dollars were used in 2005 for the prevention of marijuana.

In the United States, 20.9% of the adult population is estimated to be a smoker, nearly 23.3% of high school student population and 8.1% of middle school student population. If one in five of these people are expected to die, which should be considered the more egregious crime?

The primary purpose of government continues to be ignored by our elected representatives: the protection of the people.

The illogical and futile war on drugs has proven to be more important to our representatives than the wellbeing of millions of their constituents.

NORML.ORG US TX: War On Drugs Costly, Futile (http://www.mapinc.org/norml/v07/n140/a01.htm)

Totally a good article. If people can have the personal freedom to smoke cigarettes, why can't I have the personal freedom to smoke marijuana?

Nochowderforyou
02-06-2007, 09:05 PM
You know, I rack my brain trying to figure out a good response as to why cannabis is illegal and alcohol/tobacco aren't, but I still don't know why. I mean, how much more proof do we need to show that tobacco kills thousands of people per. year? I really don't get it.

I'm not saying cannabis isn't totally safe, as some people don't have as much self control as others, but it by far much safer than alcohol and tobacco.

It all confuses me to no end.

timothylearyisdead
02-06-2007, 09:15 PM
If people can have the personal freedom to smoke cigarettes, why can't I have the personal freedom to smoke marijuana?

Because cigs are highly addictive and therefore bring in a lot more bacon than marijuana. Plus if marijuana was legal, that means people would be able to grow free medication, thus making all those dangerous legal perscription drugs obsolete. We can't have that now can we?

Weeden
02-06-2007, 10:23 PM
Because cigs are highly addictive and therefore bring in a lot more bacon than marijuana. Plus if marijuana was legal, that means people would be able to grow free medication, thus making all those dangerous legal perscription drugs obsolete. We can't have that now can we?

Well, from a financial standpoint of the large companies, the tobacco company would stand to make trillions off of selling weed. I'm surprised that they don't try to push the legalization of it more...

Skink
02-06-2007, 10:57 PM
Using bad substances to promote marijuana is a bad road to take IMO... making Marijuana look the lessor of two evils also makes it look evil...

deftdrummer
02-06-2007, 11:19 PM
Ya I would way rather have joe blow downplaying marijuana to me somewhere than a tabocco company telling me their new weed/cig hybrid was even better than orange crush.

Leebstatus
02-06-2007, 11:51 PM
Using bad substances to promote marijuana is a bad road to take IMO... making Marijuana look the lessor of two evils also makes it look evil...
But it is still a start; where we stand right now, marijuana is viewed as more dangerous than both tobacco and alcohol. Baby steps.

Samwhore
02-07-2007, 12:16 AM
In the early 1960's, recreational drugs, including marijuana, became fashionable among young, white, middle class Americans.

Government is WRONG cannabis is one of the few things that sees no skin color