Log in

View Full Version : Spy Death by Nuclear Poisoning Tied to American Hiroshima



Bong30
12-07-2006, 10:39 PM
Trail of Polonium210, Jihad, suitcase nukes
Spy Death by Nuclear Poisoning Tied to American Hiroshima
By Paul L. Williams Ph.D.

& Lee Boyland

Wednesday, December 6, 2006

The death of Alexander Litvinenko by radiological poisoning points to the possibility that the former Soviet spy may have been involved with Islamic terrorists in the preparation of tactical nuclear weapons for use in the jihad against the United States and its NATO allies.

Litvenenko, a former KGB agent, died in London on November 23 after ingesting a microscopic amount of polonium-210.

In a deathbed statement, Litvinenko blamed Russian President Vladimir Putin for the poisoning--an accusation which the Kremlin has vehemently denied.

The denial is fortified by the fact that polonium-210 is a very rare radiological substance that is man-made by bombarding Bismuth-209 with neutrons within a nuclear reactor. It is expensive to produce and difficult to handle.

When Russian officials resorted to nuclear poisoning in the past-- including the assassination of two Swiss intelligence officials who were engaged with Russia and South Africa in the nuclear black market--they relied on such readily available radiological substances as cesium-137 in salt form.

According to nuclear expert David Morgan, killing a spy or political dissident with a grain or two of polonium-210 is as ludicrous as shooting a rat with a howitzer.

Litvinenko, who was born an orthodox Christian, was a convert to Islam with close ties to the Chechen rebels. His last words consisted of his desire to be buried ??according to Muslim tradition.?

In recent years, considerable attention has been paid to suitcase nukes that were developed by U.S. and Soviet forces during the Cold War. Reliable sources, including Hans Blix of the United Nation, have confirmed that bin Laden purchased several of these devices from the Chechen rebels in 1996. According to Sharif al-Masri and other al Qaeda operatives who have been taken into custody, several of these weapons have been forward deployed to the United States in preparation for al Qaeda??s next attack on American soil.

This brings us to the mysterious case of Litvinenko.

The neutron source or ??triggers? of the suitcase nukes are composed of beryllium-9 and polonium-210. When these two elements are combined, the alpha particle is absorbed by the nucleus of the beryllium causing it to decay by emitting a neutron. Such ??triggers? were a feature of early nuclear weapons in the U.S. and Soviet stockpiles.

Polonium-210 has a half-life of 138 days, necessitating the replacement of the triggers every six months. For this reason, the suitcase nukes are far from maintenance-free. In addition, the nuclear core of these devices emit a temperature in excess of one hundred degrees Fahrenheit - - further exposing the weapons to oxidation and rust. Small wonder that al Qaeda operatives including Adnan el-Shukrijumah, who are spearheading ??the American Hiroshima? have received extensive training in nuclear technology.

Polonium-beryllium triggers are packaged in foil packs about the size of a package of sugar on a restaurant table. When the twin foil packages are crushed, the elements mix and the neutrons are emitted. A courier transporting nuclear triggers could have had a mishap causing the packages to rupture and a trail of contamination to occur.

Polonium-210 is a fine powder, easily aerosolized. Litvinenko could have inhaled the powder, or had a grain or two on his fingers when he ate the sushi.

darkside
12-08-2006, 04:02 PM
maybe hurricane katrina was also a plot by radical islam to discredit the bush administration. and oh yeah, i can shoot flaming balls of fire from my arse.

Bong30
12-09-2006, 03:26 PM
Great come back....any thoughts on the article?


you can go to the doc for your condidtion.....

Bong30
12-09-2006, 03:35 PM
yes you are right i serched and serched and serched for it.......



or it was on the front page of savage......what ever?



Hey billion what are you going to do if they do detonate nukes here in there usa?


do you even care?....Im sure evil america has it coming in your eyes...

Bong30
12-09-2006, 04:03 PM
got your dumd ass thinking about it HUH?

Bong30
12-09-2006, 04:11 PM
If they knew me, it would be......

I would defend my self, and my family...very well thank you



Billion when are you going to wake up?

darkside
12-09-2006, 04:19 PM
Great come back....any thoughts on the article?


you can go to the doc for your condidtion.....

my condition is called rational thought and sadly, its terminal. if you listen to michael savage youre even more delusional than i thought.

Bong30
12-09-2006, 04:21 PM
Terminal....stupidity. you dont die from it you just become a Liberal

Bong30
12-09-2006, 04:36 PM
Just remeber Bill your boy Gdub, is a liberal


you are socialist....commie fuck. see the diff?

darkside
12-09-2006, 04:51 PM
Just remeber Bill your boy Gdub, is a liberal


you are socialist....commie fuck. see the diff?

you are seriously screwed up in the head if you think bush is a liberal. do you even know the definition of the terms liberal, socialist, or communist? or do you just spew insults like an ignorant child? doodyhead! no your a doodyhead! thats about how childish your insults sound. please dont use words that your developing brain cant comprehend yet.

Bong30
12-10-2006, 05:22 PM
you are seriously screwed up in the head if you think bush is a liberal.

Let me explain it to you.....

Bush is liberal
Big spending
weak milatary
weak borders
Clinton was more conservitive than bush

Socialist...like most of you

no borders
goverment healthcare
big goverment programs
talking with enemy....lets all get along
its all about the goverment...its there fault..its not there fault....please

do you even know the definition of the terms liberal, socialist, or communist?

The problem is...nobody knows what a conservitive is, you didnt even list it.

or do you just spew insults like an ignorant child?

Im so far above you...you think im dumb.....im not talking spelling and grammer im talking ideas


doodyhead! no your a doodyhead! thats about how childish your insults sound.

Just cause you dont debate the points......i get pissed


please dont use words that your developing brain cant comprehend yet.


Ill try to keep it down for you....

im sure if i was a Lib you would be backing me...but since im not. You Bash.

darkside
12-10-2006, 06:52 PM
Let me explain it to you.....

Bush is liberal- no, bush is a neoconservative, as are cheney, rove, rumsfeld, and the rest of his gang
Big spending- yes they do, and all your conservative republican friends in congress voted for his spending increases.
weak milatary we're weak because our troops are stretched too far and are stuck policing a civil war in a country we shouldnt be in. thanks neocons
weak borders-bush is weak. period
Clinton was more conservitive than bush

Socialist...like most of you-i'm not socialist, i'm a libertarian

no borders-i'm for better controls of borders, but i'm against this rediculous fence, i mean, cmon.
goverment healthcare-i do not support gov healthcare.
big goverment programs-i do not support big gov. it is my opinion that the sole purpose of government should be to protect the natural rights of man, not to abridge them.
talking with enemy....lets all get along why not? keep your friends close, but your enemies closer.
its all about the goverment...its there fault..its not there fault....please- governments should be held accountable for their actions.

bong, i'm sure you would agree with me on many issues, but you seem to only want to talk about muslims and the middle east, while i'm more concerned with the problems facing american liberty at home. while the problem of islamic terrorism is very real, its not worth giving up our freedoms and privacy, because if we do, then the terrorists have succeeded and there is nothing left to fight for. why should we fight totalitarian regimes overseas when we're creating one over here. id rather die free than live in chains. bong, i hope we can keep these debates friendly and i hope to have many more. keep smokin:jointsmile:

medicinal
12-10-2006, 07:19 PM
Liberal: read it for yourself then decide if all the liberal bashing on these sites are accurate: Merriam Websters definition of liberal: 1:Of, relating to, or based on the liberal arts; 2: Generous-Bountiful; 3: Not literal; 4: Not narrow in judgement or opinion; Also, : not orthodox; 5: Not conservative. I believe these to be the traits of a thinking person. BTW the definition of conservative is the opposite, like: narrow minded, stingy, etc!

mrdevious
12-12-2006, 06:36 PM
There also seems to be a certain unique quality to extremist American liberalism, as compared to other forms. Not to mention most people don't seem to understand the difference between reform liberalism and classical liberalism. The liberalism that most conservatives hate and identify as all liberalism, is the reform brand. Classical liberalism, IMHO, seems a much more sensible ideology and encompasses qualities from the current right and left spectrum.