Why

[cambam]

Has my FAO Dryst thread been deleted?

[make it legal]

i dunno a little constructive criticism never hurt anyone

[cambam]

Admin, please may I have an explaination?

It wasn't offensive, it had no reference to MoM.

I am totally bewildered as to why it was removed.

[make it legal]

haha sorry im not an admin answering your question but you have to admit that dryst isnt that bad in that sense considering how bad some other fucking retards are with that. honestly it pisses me off to no end when i cant understand 75% of the words in a post

[dryst]

uhh wtf is FOA?...and why is my name in ur thread?

[make it legal]

he says you type poorley

[make it legal]

and what is and FAO?

[cambam]

and what is and FAO?

For the Attention Of...


And Dryst, whats the attitude for?

[azure]

"for attention of"

[dryst]

well what did it say?...i didnt read it, and i thought it might be offensive since it got deleted?

[dryst]

oh lol i type poorly?...read my post i just replied to in my thread 'cops just beta the shit outta the carnival staff'

[cambam]

well what did it say?...i didnt read it, and i thought it might be offensive since it got deleted?

I can't remember everything I said, but basically asked nicely if you could take a little more time when posting, bearing in mind its difficult for stoners to read large blocks of eun-formatted pieces of text. Basically capitalisation, punctuation and structure.

Just a little pointer, as I found it increasingly diffucult to read your 'Carni@ post, had to give up after 5 lines, was proving far too difficult to read.

No dissing or offensive material was posted.

[BobBong]

because it was going to turn into an obvious dryst beat-a-thon or vice versa i'm not sure..But I don't see why you should care about the way one posts.. it makes no relevance to you or the posts you make(or this site for that matter). If you do not like this user you could simply ignore them.

I care about the content of the posts , not the way they're worded. The thread you made was critisizing dryst's forum punctuality of all things. As constructive as you may thought it was, it's unnecessary... and surely you can find better things to do than pick on the grammar of one person.

Bob.

[make it legal]

well personally i dont think that capitalizing letters and using perfect punctuation is completely neccisary as lons as you spell words right and distinguish different sentences.

[cambam]

As i said in my firstline, Bob, it was in no way a diss thread, far from it. It was a post outta frustration. Just pointing something out and offering a poss solution.
I could put moneyon that many people had the same, or simmiler, thoughts that I had.

There was nothing inflammatory about it.

I didnt even have a problem about the content he posted, I have oppinions, but I wasn't pointing them out.

I don't claim to be oerfect myself, speeling and gramma wise.

High horse, off it.

[BobBong]

The point is, it was aimed directly at pointing out a flaw in (of all things) the way someone posts on a forum.

Take some constructive criticism and stop caring abooot tha whey won poasts on tha 4..um...



:stoned:

That's all.

Bob.

[make it legal]

I don't claim to be oerfect myself, speeling and gramma wise.

hahahahaha

[psychocat]

I have to say that if I can't decipher what someone is saying then it will prove difficult to understand what they are putting across.
There is some validity in asking someone who mumbles to speak more clearly and surely this is simply the same only with writing?

[BobBong]

I have to say that if I can't decipher what someone is saying then it will prove difficult to understand what they are putting across.
There is some validity in asking someone who mumbles to speak more clearly and surely this is simply the same only with writing?


;gakjhg raj hapufh a a;eofahe;ofhaw;o afihu f9f9vj ;id;aflkan ;ajdsba dbadm esahf;ash f;ashfsad;' aad 'asf 'iojaf 'af j adfjsdhflkshflsjfbal b kdjh f;uiabc;iuasbus sou sdfoahiofns.

[BobBong]

fs83fjs sfk89238 jsdfdfjf0j234? F23-9r0jw0f3f j0wfj0 wj jwjf jwejjwjefj.



Right... the point is.. at least you can read what drsyt is trying to say.. isn't that what matters? I still haven't read anything posted that hasn't take more than a split second to understand..and even when i do. I remember that this is an english website in international waters, we ask people to post in english so that we can mildly understand what they're saying. As long as it's mildly understandable it's all good.


Cheers, and Stay stoned.
Bob.:stoned:

[cambam]

Woah. Didn't even know this side of the forum existed.


And heres me trippin out thinkin' I was a bad-ass, by having 3 threads deleted in like an hour, when in reality, oe was, one was moved, and the other I forgot what it was called.


CSS

Classic Stoner Syndrome.

[BobBong]

Woah. Didn't even know this side of the forum existed.


And heres me trippin out thinkin' I was a bad-ass, by having 3 threads deleted in like an hour, when in reality, oe was, one was moved, and the other I forgot what it was called.


CSS

Classic Stoner Syndrome.

We generally reserve this forum for constructive criticism. :)

[psychocat]

Right... the point is.. at least you can read what drsyt is trying to say.. isn't that what matters? I still haven't read anything posted that hasn't take more than a split second to understand..and even when i do. I remember that this is an english website in international waters, we ask people to post in english so that we can mildly understand what they're saying. As long as it's mildly understandable it's all good.
Cheers, and Stay stoned.
Bob.:stoned:

Can we make this less personal and keep Dryst out of it as you are perpetuating the stupidity of the original posters choice to name instead of just generalizing and saying that some folks posts are difficult to read ,(IMO) the problem is people just can't take constructive criticism.

May I ask why you are continuing to use Drysts name when I was making a blanket statement that easy to understand is better than unreadable babble?

I think we all agree that personal comments are uncalled for but the point made is still valid which is "confusion is avoided through clarity."

I also understand the language barriers since I speak a couple of languages other than my original tongue (English) and fully realise what the saying lost in translation means.

[cambam]

Can we make this less personal and keep Dryst out of it as you are perpetuating the stupidity of the original posters choice to name ...

Thats what I DIDN'T stoop to, name calling. Well done.:dance:

[cambam]

AND, if you notice, I was addressinig HIM, hence the FAO (Insert poster's Name here) title of the thread.

There. I can be as PC as you.

[BobBong]

Can we make this less personal and keep Dryst out of it as you are perpetuating the stupidity of the original posters choice to name instead of just generalizing and saying that some folks posts are difficult to read ,(IMO) the problem is people just can't take constructive criticism.

May I ask why you are continuing to use Drysts name when I was making a blanket statement that easy to understand is better than unreadable babble?

I think we all agree that personal comments are uncalled for but the point made is still valid which is "confusion is avoided through clarity."

I also understand the language barriers since I speak a couple of languages other than my original tongue (English) and fully realise what the saying lost in translation means.

Sorry i was simply using dryst as an example as the thread was made about and directed at dryst. I'm not making this an issue, as this is simply.. not one.
I understand you were making a blanket statement.. as was I. instead of making it in one post though, i made it into an openly critical conversation. perhaps to open?
I think we're both on the same page, and really dont need to continue this...As long as it is mildly understandable there's really no reason to complain is there? I don't think so..

:thumbsup:
Bob.

[kiwi]

:confused: This is going no where so I am going to close this thread. I think the other MODS have explained the situation well enuf for all to understand.:thumbsup: