Sinsemilla Jones
08-01-2006, 09:38 AM
"At 4 to 5 kilograms of plutonium per weapon, this stock would allow the production of over 40 to 50 nuclear weapons a year."
http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20060724/ts_nm/nuclear_arms_pakistan_dc_2
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Pakistan is building a reactor that could produce enough plutonium for 40 to 50 nuclear weapons in what would be a major expansion of its nuclear program and an intensified arms race in South Asia, a report showed on Monday (July 24).
Satellite photos show what appears to be the construction site for a larger nuclear reactor adjacent to Pakistan's only plutonium production reactor, according to an analysis by nuclear experts at the Washington-based Institute for Science and International Security.
The assessment, initially reported by The Washington Post, was posted on the institute's Web site.
The analysts concluded that the diameter of the structure's metal shell suggests a very large reactor "operating in excess of 1,000 megawatts thermal," according to the report.
"Such a reactor could produce over 200 kilograms of weapons-grade plutonium per year, assuming it operates at full power a modest 220 days per year," the technical assessment said. "At 4 to 5 kilograms of plutonium per weapon, this stock would allow the production of over 40 to 50 nuclear weapons a year."
Pakistan currently is capable of producing about 10 kilograms of plutonium a year, enough for about two warheads, The Washington Post said.
Construction of the new reactor in Khushab apparently began sometime after March 2000. But the report's authors said Pakistan does not appear to be moving quickly to finish the reactor, and cited possible shortages of necessary reactor components or weapons production infrastructure.
"India is likely aware of this reactor construction in Khushab," the institute's David Albright and Paul Brannan wrote. "Has this influenced India to increase its own plutonium production capacity for its nuclear weapons program?
"South Asia may be heading for a nuclear arms race that could lead to arsenals growing into the hundreds of nuclear weapons, or at minimum, vastly expanded stockpiles of military fissile material."
Pakistani officials would neither confirm or deny the report, but a senior Pakistani official, speaking on condition of anonymity, acknowledged that a nuclear expansion was under way, the Post reported.
The newspaper reported that a Europe-based diplomat and nuclear expert and a U.S.-based expert who reviewed the commercially available satellite images and supporting data concurred fully with the institute's estimates.
--------------------------------------------------------
Of course, I'm sure Iran's desire for nukes has nothing to do with this, even though Pakistan is their neighbor. I mean, Pakistan attacking Iran would be like Iraq attacking Iran.
In fact, even though Iran is surrounded by the nuclear armed countries of Pakistan, India, China, Russia, and Israel, not to mention the U.S. presence in Iraq and Afghanistan, I'm sure that instead of keeping any nukes they manage to produce as a deterrent to nuclear attack (of which, they have none, now), they will immediately use them and thus insure their own destruction.
As for Pakistan, they just want hundreds of nukes to flatter us with imitation. And I'm sure they'll be ruled by a pro-US dictator, forever.
:rolleyes:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20060724/ts_nm/nuclear_arms_pakistan_dc_2
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Pakistan is building a reactor that could produce enough plutonium for 40 to 50 nuclear weapons in what would be a major expansion of its nuclear program and an intensified arms race in South Asia, a report showed on Monday (July 24).
Satellite photos show what appears to be the construction site for a larger nuclear reactor adjacent to Pakistan's only plutonium production reactor, according to an analysis by nuclear experts at the Washington-based Institute for Science and International Security.
The assessment, initially reported by The Washington Post, was posted on the institute's Web site.
The analysts concluded that the diameter of the structure's metal shell suggests a very large reactor "operating in excess of 1,000 megawatts thermal," according to the report.
"Such a reactor could produce over 200 kilograms of weapons-grade plutonium per year, assuming it operates at full power a modest 220 days per year," the technical assessment said. "At 4 to 5 kilograms of plutonium per weapon, this stock would allow the production of over 40 to 50 nuclear weapons a year."
Pakistan currently is capable of producing about 10 kilograms of plutonium a year, enough for about two warheads, The Washington Post said.
Construction of the new reactor in Khushab apparently began sometime after March 2000. But the report's authors said Pakistan does not appear to be moving quickly to finish the reactor, and cited possible shortages of necessary reactor components or weapons production infrastructure.
"India is likely aware of this reactor construction in Khushab," the institute's David Albright and Paul Brannan wrote. "Has this influenced India to increase its own plutonium production capacity for its nuclear weapons program?
"South Asia may be heading for a nuclear arms race that could lead to arsenals growing into the hundreds of nuclear weapons, or at minimum, vastly expanded stockpiles of military fissile material."
Pakistani officials would neither confirm or deny the report, but a senior Pakistani official, speaking on condition of anonymity, acknowledged that a nuclear expansion was under way, the Post reported.
The newspaper reported that a Europe-based diplomat and nuclear expert and a U.S.-based expert who reviewed the commercially available satellite images and supporting data concurred fully with the institute's estimates.
--------------------------------------------------------
Of course, I'm sure Iran's desire for nukes has nothing to do with this, even though Pakistan is their neighbor. I mean, Pakistan attacking Iran would be like Iraq attacking Iran.
In fact, even though Iran is surrounded by the nuclear armed countries of Pakistan, India, China, Russia, and Israel, not to mention the U.S. presence in Iraq and Afghanistan, I'm sure that instead of keeping any nukes they manage to produce as a deterrent to nuclear attack (of which, they have none, now), they will immediately use them and thus insure their own destruction.
As for Pakistan, they just want hundreds of nukes to flatter us with imitation. And I'm sure they'll be ruled by a pro-US dictator, forever.
:rolleyes: