AT&T rewrites rules: Your data isn't yours

[intangible child]

Takes effect Friday- June 23, 2006

AT&T has issued an updated privacy policy that takes effect Friday. The changes are significant because they appear to give the telecom giant more latitude when it comes to sharing customers' personal data with government officials.

The new policy says that AT&T -- not customers -- owns customers' confidential info and can use it "to protect its legitimate business interests, safeguard others, or respond to legal process."

The policy also indicates that AT&T will track the viewing habits of customers of its new video service -- something that cable and satellite providers are prohibited from doing.

Moreover, AT&T (formerly known as SBC) is requiring customers to agree to its updated privacy policy as a condition for service -- a new move that legal experts say will reduce customers' recourse for any future data sharing with government authorities or others.
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2006/06/21/BUG9VJHB9C1.DTL

--------------------
"Guard with jealous attention the public liberty. Suspect everyone who approaches that jewel." --- Patrick Henry

[minnesota man]

Why do you have to use the largest font for your sig? It's a bit of a space hog. I can tell your upset because of the red font too. Why don't you change your telephone service? If I don't like supporting the Chinese military, I don't shop at Wal-mart.

[minnesota man]

Wait. Why did you post in feedback and suggestions?

[willystylle]

Why do you have to use the largest font for your sig?


What's wrong with big sigs? It's like having a fro when you're a white guy.

[Zandor]

The reason that was done is for a new bill in congress that would give them the right to provide anything they want in the way of service from state to state and only need to follow federal law and over ride the local state law that has kept them in check for many years.

This is one again big brother wanting to control the people. The consumer has no choice in many cases but to agree but that does not mean it's legal. I understand the ACLU is once again suing them over this shift in policy but when Bush owns the justice system I don't think we have a chance anymore. When the gov can go to bed with corporate America they don't need search warrants all they need is to have their partner give them the information and it's all legal and nothing you can do.

They just got around the construction and used it like a piece of toilet paper.

Sorry but I think we may be in for a long ride before this madness comes to an end.