pisshead
06-19-2006, 07:45 PM
N. Korea Has Already 'Mock Nuked' Alaska - With US Government Help
New reports about threat of missile launch omit key facts
Paul Joseph Watson/Prison Planet.com | June 19 2006 (http://prisonplanet.com/index.html)
Reports today concerning the completed fueling of North Korea's long range Taepodong-2 missile and its planned launch within a month omit several key aspects of the story, including the fact that North Korea already launched a missile that hit Alaska, with the help of the US government.
In March 2003, the Korea Times (http://times.hankooki.com/lpage/nation/200303/kt2003030417272311970.htm) reported that the U.S. National Assembly included a startling admission in its final report regarding Pyongyang??s missile capabilities.
A nuclear-capable North Korean test warhead was found in Alaska.
``According to a U.S. document, the last piece of a missile warhead fired by North Korea was found in Alaska,???? former Japanese foreign minister Taro Nakayama was quoted as saying in the report. ``Washington, as well as Tokyo, has so far underrated Pyongyang??s missile capabilities.????
A story that would have expected to garner front page headlines for days was completely blacked out in the US, with not one single newspaper choosing to report it.
The reason?
How could the Bush administration sell a war against a country with no means to defend itself and as it later transpired with no weapons of mass destruction, when a country with WMD was firing long-range nuclear capable missiles that were hitting the western coast of the US?
The 1994 Agreed Framework deal gave North Korea the capacity to generate enough nuclear fuel to produce almost 100 nuclear bombs per year. A 1999 congressional study (http://www.newsmax.com/showinside.shtml?a=2002/10/19/114657) undertaken by the House North Korea Advisory Group warned,
??Through the provision of two light water reactors [LWRs] under the 1994 Agreed Framework, the United States, through KEDO, will provide North Korea with the capacity to produce annually enough fissile material for nearly 100 nuclear bombs, should the Democratic People's Republic of Korea [DPRK] decide to violate the Nonproliferation Treaty [NPT].?
In April 2002 the Bush administration announced that it would release $95 million of American taxpayer??s dollars to begin construction of the ??harmless?? light water reactors. Bush argued that arming the megalomaniac dictator Kim Jong-Il with the potential to produce a hundred nukes a year was, ??vital to the national security interests of the United States.? Bush released even more money in January 2003, as reported by Bloomberg News (http://www.prisonplanet.com/news_alert_012003_nkorea.html),
??President George W. Bush is seeking $3.5 million for the international consortium that continues to build two nuclear reactors for North Korea, even as the U.S. confronts the communist regime over nuclear arms.?
The company that got the contract to deliver equipment and services to build the two light water reactor stations was ABB (Asea Brown Boveri), which describes itself as, ??a leader in power and automation technologies that enable utility and industry customers to improve performance while lowering environmental impact.? The contract was valued at $200 million and was signed (http://www.abb.com/global/abbzh/abbzh251.nsf!OpenDatabase&db=/global/ABBZH/abbzh250.nsf&v=c&e=us&c=316DCEEDCA12D32E4125686C00433604) in January 2000.
It should not surprise us that our old friend Donald Rumsfeld, the man who paved the way for U.S. companies to sell Iraq chemical and biological weapons in 1983, was an executive director for ABB from 2000-2001. Rumsfeld resigned when he was appointed U.S. Secretary of Defense.
Wolfram Eberhardt, a spokesman for ABB confirmed that Rumsfeld was at nearly all the board meetings during his involvement with the company. The meetings were held quarterly in Zurich, Switzerland. However, Rumsfeld again displays his uncanny ability to forget things in stating that he ??doesn??t remember?? the issue of North Korea being brought before the ABB board. Swiss Info (http://www.swissinfo.org/sen/swissinfo.html?siteSect=105&sid=1648385) concluded,
??Rumsfeld??s position at ABB could prove embarrassing for the Bush administration since while he was a director he was also active on issues of weapons proliferation, chairing the 1998 congressional Ballistic Missile Threat commission.?
North Korea is controlled by a hereditary Stalinist dictatorship that has starved two million of its citizens to death in favor of building a million-man army. Some people put the figure at four million, one-quarter of the population. In the far north of the country there is a network of forced labor gulags (http://www.msnbc.com/news/859191.asp?0cl=cR) where people who have ??expressed a bland political opinion?? are, along with their entire families, tortured, raped and executed. Horrific bio-chemical experiments are performed on mass numbers of people.
Babies are delivered and then stamped to death by the camp guards. If the mother screams while the guards are stamping on the baby??s neck, she is immediately assassinated by a firing squad. These guards are rewarded with bonuses and promotions for ripping out prisoners?? eyeballs.
The North Korean people are enslaved by a government that is using food as a weapon. Perhaps this is why the EU and the United States, via the UN World Food Program, resumed the shipment of hundreds of
thousands of tons in food aid at the end of February 2003. This goes directly to the sitting dictatorship, which then decides who gets it by their level of allegiance to the state. Food aid only increases the power of Kim Jong-Il and yet it is veiled by the UN in bleeding heart humanitarian rhetoric. The money goes straight to enabling the North Korean leadership to live in the lap of westernized luxury with casinos and lavish new cars.
President Bush publicly claims to loathe Kim Jong-Il and yet his administration, like Bill Clinton before him, has armed North Korea to the teeth with anything up to and beyond 200 nuclear bombs.
Under the 1994 Agreed Framework, the Clinton administration agreed to replace North Korea??s domestically built nuclear reactors with light water nuclear reactors. So-called government-funded ??experts?? stated that light water reactors couldn??t be used to make bombs. Not so according to Henry Sokolski, head of the Non-proliferation Policy Education Centre in Washington,
??LWRs could be used to produce dozens of bombs' worth of weapons-grade plutonium in both North Korea and Iran. This is true of all LWRs -- a depressing fact U.S. policymakers have managed to block out.?
Sokolski has also gone on the record (http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/asia-pacific/1908571.stm) as saying,
??These reactors are like all reactors, they have the potential to make weapons. So you might end up supplying the worst nuclear violator with the means to acquire the very weapons we're trying to prevent it acquiring.?
The U.S. State Department contends that the light water reactors cannot be used to produce bomb grade material and yet in 2002 urged Russia to end its nuclear co-operation with Iran for the reason that it doesn??t want Iran armed with weapons of mass destruction. Russia is building light water reactors in Iran. The State Department announced (http://usinfo.state.gov/topical/pol/arms/03020321.htm)on its own web site,
??In the official answer to a question asked at the January 31 State Department daily briefing, the State Department said the United States has "consistently urged Russia to cease all [nuclear] cooperation with Iran, including its assistance to the light water reactor at Bushehr.?
??We have underscored to Russia that an end to Russian nuclear assistance to Iran would allow the United States and Russia to reap the full promise of our new strategic relationship, benefiting Russia economically and strategically far more than any short-term gain from construction of additional reactors or other sensitive transfers to Iran.?
According to the State Department, light water reactors in Iran can produce nuclear material but somehow the same rule doesn??t apply in North Korea.
Despite this it seems that the Iranians are beginning to learn an important lesson.
Rogue states with absolutely no means to defend themselves are picked off by the Globalists on a whim, but countries that have amassed a nuclear arsenal, with receipts from the US government to prove it, seem to become immune to the Bush administration's global democracy drive, no matter how atrocious their human rights record.
New reports about threat of missile launch omit key facts
Paul Joseph Watson/Prison Planet.com | June 19 2006 (http://prisonplanet.com/index.html)
Reports today concerning the completed fueling of North Korea's long range Taepodong-2 missile and its planned launch within a month omit several key aspects of the story, including the fact that North Korea already launched a missile that hit Alaska, with the help of the US government.
In March 2003, the Korea Times (http://times.hankooki.com/lpage/nation/200303/kt2003030417272311970.htm) reported that the U.S. National Assembly included a startling admission in its final report regarding Pyongyang??s missile capabilities.
A nuclear-capable North Korean test warhead was found in Alaska.
``According to a U.S. document, the last piece of a missile warhead fired by North Korea was found in Alaska,???? former Japanese foreign minister Taro Nakayama was quoted as saying in the report. ``Washington, as well as Tokyo, has so far underrated Pyongyang??s missile capabilities.????
A story that would have expected to garner front page headlines for days was completely blacked out in the US, with not one single newspaper choosing to report it.
The reason?
How could the Bush administration sell a war against a country with no means to defend itself and as it later transpired with no weapons of mass destruction, when a country with WMD was firing long-range nuclear capable missiles that were hitting the western coast of the US?
The 1994 Agreed Framework deal gave North Korea the capacity to generate enough nuclear fuel to produce almost 100 nuclear bombs per year. A 1999 congressional study (http://www.newsmax.com/showinside.shtml?a=2002/10/19/114657) undertaken by the House North Korea Advisory Group warned,
??Through the provision of two light water reactors [LWRs] under the 1994 Agreed Framework, the United States, through KEDO, will provide North Korea with the capacity to produce annually enough fissile material for nearly 100 nuclear bombs, should the Democratic People's Republic of Korea [DPRK] decide to violate the Nonproliferation Treaty [NPT].?
In April 2002 the Bush administration announced that it would release $95 million of American taxpayer??s dollars to begin construction of the ??harmless?? light water reactors. Bush argued that arming the megalomaniac dictator Kim Jong-Il with the potential to produce a hundred nukes a year was, ??vital to the national security interests of the United States.? Bush released even more money in January 2003, as reported by Bloomberg News (http://www.prisonplanet.com/news_alert_012003_nkorea.html),
??President George W. Bush is seeking $3.5 million for the international consortium that continues to build two nuclear reactors for North Korea, even as the U.S. confronts the communist regime over nuclear arms.?
The company that got the contract to deliver equipment and services to build the two light water reactor stations was ABB (Asea Brown Boveri), which describes itself as, ??a leader in power and automation technologies that enable utility and industry customers to improve performance while lowering environmental impact.? The contract was valued at $200 million and was signed (http://www.abb.com/global/abbzh/abbzh251.nsf!OpenDatabase&db=/global/ABBZH/abbzh250.nsf&v=c&e=us&c=316DCEEDCA12D32E4125686C00433604) in January 2000.
It should not surprise us that our old friend Donald Rumsfeld, the man who paved the way for U.S. companies to sell Iraq chemical and biological weapons in 1983, was an executive director for ABB from 2000-2001. Rumsfeld resigned when he was appointed U.S. Secretary of Defense.
Wolfram Eberhardt, a spokesman for ABB confirmed that Rumsfeld was at nearly all the board meetings during his involvement with the company. The meetings were held quarterly in Zurich, Switzerland. However, Rumsfeld again displays his uncanny ability to forget things in stating that he ??doesn??t remember?? the issue of North Korea being brought before the ABB board. Swiss Info (http://www.swissinfo.org/sen/swissinfo.html?siteSect=105&sid=1648385) concluded,
??Rumsfeld??s position at ABB could prove embarrassing for the Bush administration since while he was a director he was also active on issues of weapons proliferation, chairing the 1998 congressional Ballistic Missile Threat commission.?
North Korea is controlled by a hereditary Stalinist dictatorship that has starved two million of its citizens to death in favor of building a million-man army. Some people put the figure at four million, one-quarter of the population. In the far north of the country there is a network of forced labor gulags (http://www.msnbc.com/news/859191.asp?0cl=cR) where people who have ??expressed a bland political opinion?? are, along with their entire families, tortured, raped and executed. Horrific bio-chemical experiments are performed on mass numbers of people.
Babies are delivered and then stamped to death by the camp guards. If the mother screams while the guards are stamping on the baby??s neck, she is immediately assassinated by a firing squad. These guards are rewarded with bonuses and promotions for ripping out prisoners?? eyeballs.
The North Korean people are enslaved by a government that is using food as a weapon. Perhaps this is why the EU and the United States, via the UN World Food Program, resumed the shipment of hundreds of
thousands of tons in food aid at the end of February 2003. This goes directly to the sitting dictatorship, which then decides who gets it by their level of allegiance to the state. Food aid only increases the power of Kim Jong-Il and yet it is veiled by the UN in bleeding heart humanitarian rhetoric. The money goes straight to enabling the North Korean leadership to live in the lap of westernized luxury with casinos and lavish new cars.
President Bush publicly claims to loathe Kim Jong-Il and yet his administration, like Bill Clinton before him, has armed North Korea to the teeth with anything up to and beyond 200 nuclear bombs.
Under the 1994 Agreed Framework, the Clinton administration agreed to replace North Korea??s domestically built nuclear reactors with light water nuclear reactors. So-called government-funded ??experts?? stated that light water reactors couldn??t be used to make bombs. Not so according to Henry Sokolski, head of the Non-proliferation Policy Education Centre in Washington,
??LWRs could be used to produce dozens of bombs' worth of weapons-grade plutonium in both North Korea and Iran. This is true of all LWRs -- a depressing fact U.S. policymakers have managed to block out.?
Sokolski has also gone on the record (http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/asia-pacific/1908571.stm) as saying,
??These reactors are like all reactors, they have the potential to make weapons. So you might end up supplying the worst nuclear violator with the means to acquire the very weapons we're trying to prevent it acquiring.?
The U.S. State Department contends that the light water reactors cannot be used to produce bomb grade material and yet in 2002 urged Russia to end its nuclear co-operation with Iran for the reason that it doesn??t want Iran armed with weapons of mass destruction. Russia is building light water reactors in Iran. The State Department announced (http://usinfo.state.gov/topical/pol/arms/03020321.htm)on its own web site,
??In the official answer to a question asked at the January 31 State Department daily briefing, the State Department said the United States has "consistently urged Russia to cease all [nuclear] cooperation with Iran, including its assistance to the light water reactor at Bushehr.?
??We have underscored to Russia that an end to Russian nuclear assistance to Iran would allow the United States and Russia to reap the full promise of our new strategic relationship, benefiting Russia economically and strategically far more than any short-term gain from construction of additional reactors or other sensitive transfers to Iran.?
According to the State Department, light water reactors in Iran can produce nuclear material but somehow the same rule doesn??t apply in North Korea.
Despite this it seems that the Iranians are beginning to learn an important lesson.
Rogue states with absolutely no means to defend themselves are picked off by the Globalists on a whim, but countries that have amassed a nuclear arsenal, with receipts from the US government to prove it, seem to become immune to the Bush administration's global democracy drive, no matter how atrocious their human rights record.