da vinci code

[sweetnhighz]

has anybody watched the movie yet? if so what did you think about it? i plan on watching it sometime this week then watch xmen 3! yayayayayay!

[josh g]

I knew sumone wud post this sooner or later!
well, i watched it... and i will never forget it.
its an awesome muvi to see...

[Powder Puff]

Can't be awsome! All the kritcs HATED it.. No chemistry between the actors, no nothing.. People even leaved the theater in Cannes before the movie ended..

Anywhoo, I'm going to watch it when it comes out on DVD.. The theatre here isn't showing it.. Fucking christians!!

[sweetnhighz]

lol man i heard from everyone thats not a critic thats watched it said its awesome. and im sure it is since tom hanks is in it and hes the best actor i swear! so i think people hate on it cause it sheds a different light and if anybody makes a movie about jesus people go biserk! i believe we need more movies specially one on revelations on the end and final battle between good and evil. thats just my theory......

[Powder Puff]

The book.. It's pretty hard to make a good book into a good movie.. It doesn't always work! It's a good book though!!:D

[SomeGuy]

Awesome Book...and I plan on watching the movie...
what pisses me off is all the people that have problems with it need to understand...ITs a f****** FICTION book. Dan Brown has stated that. He has also said that his main goal was to get people interested in Christian History, which he has achieved...they show several ducumentarys about the Templars ect...daily now. Dan Brown him self is a christian, and I think people just need to realize that its not a factual book...Im a christian and I loved it...though I think Angels and Demons was a lot better.

[snufkin]

Can't be awsome! All the kritcs HATED it.. No chemistry between the actors, no nothing.

That's right, listen to the critics, they'll tell you what to think. You never need to watch another fil, read another book, listen to another tune. Just read the appropriate magazines and you'll always have the correct opinion.

[SomeGuy]

That's right, listen to the critics, they'll tell you what to think. You never need to watch another fil, read another book, listen to another tune. Just read the appropriate magazines and you'll always have the correct opinion.

Right On...
Critiques say something sucks all the time and that dosnt mean theyre right...

Theres alot of negative critiques about marijuana? Are they right?

[Powder Puff]

That's right, listen to the critics, they'll tell you what to think. You never need to watch another fil, read another book, listen to another tune. Just read the appropriate magazines and you'll always have the correct opinion.
Didn't I also say, I was going to watch the movie? The theatre here isn't showing it.. So, I'll just have to wait until it's out on dvd.. lol

I konw the critics are pretty moronic sometimes, and I'm not one who listens much to critics.. There are many shows that alot of people, including the critics, think SUCK..:p Anywhoo, I don't need to defend myself, as I have done nothing wrong.

:)

[graph]

You know what I liked about the movie? I didn't have to read.

Yeah, I saw it. It was alright. The ending reeeeally drags though. Is it like that in the book?

[Its a Plant]

well I don't plan on seeing it.
it makes me sick that hollywood is so desperate for ideas they are now running to best-selling books.
I read the book and liked it for the most part, but I know the movie will be almost nothing like the book. They never are.

this movie is just a way to make garunteed millions of dollars b/c most of the world is so lethargic they can watch the movie but not read the book.
so I guess hats off to them for cashing in on that, but I don't respect them making it a movie. At all.

my :twocents:

[Hempamasta]

I thought that Tom Hanks wasn't comfortable in his role as Robert Langdon, and I thought that the producers had to trim too much to fit it in to the expected movie time, which I guess makes sense, but it was disappointing nonetheless. Sophie's performance was decent. Silas' role was spot-on.

[Shelbay]

I don't like the book or movie..but that is based on a clashing personal viewpoint about it from the beginning.

[Nochowderforyou]

I wouldn't mind seeing it. Or maybe not. I hate religion all together, even if this movie says to prove there is no God. Didn't Homer do that too, and make photocopies and put them on everyone's windsheild? ;) Whatever, I'm talking out of my ass again. :p

[da haze meister]

I wouldn't mind seeing it. Or maybe not. I hate religion all together, even if this movie says to prove there is no God. Didn't Homer do that too, and make photocopies and put them on everyone's windsheild? ;) Whatever, I'm talking out of my ass again. :p
fuckin stoner...
jeez stop using that evil reefer

[SomeGuy]

Just got back from seeing it...
Umm I agree with the sentiment that Tom Hanks wasnt really a good pic for Langdon. Sophie was good, ands Silas was awesome. A good movie...followed the book. Didnt see exciting as the book but overall i would give it a B.

By the way... Nochowder and Shelby both have it wrong...
It is not by any means against religeon. It is a fictional novel written by a guy that wanted to make money, and get people interested in christian history. The fact that he has acomplished this with all the show about the templars, crusades...ect on the hist channel are good evidence that he succeeded. Dan Brown admits to being a christian and is not bashing christianity in this book.

[Nochowderforyou]

Oh, I was told and heard that the movie is suppose to prove there is no God. I know my bro's wife, who is mega religious, got offended big time when she saw the commercial for it, she said, "how dare they!" So I just assumed I guess.

I know nothing of it, so I'll just shut up. :p

[Loathsome]

First off, I never read the book, and I'm an atheist, but I loved the movie. It's not going to make me go out and read about Christian history, or even break out the bible... but I thought it was a very interesting story.

[Shelbay]

Just got back from seeing it...
Umm I agree with the sentiment that Tom Hanks wasnt really a good pic for Langdon. Sophie was good, ands Silas was awesome. A good movie...followed the book. Didnt see exciting as the book but overall i would give it a B.

By the way... Nochowder and Shelby both have it wrong...
It is not by any means against religeon. It is a fictional novel written by a guy that wanted to make money, and get people interested in christian history. The fact that he has acomplished this with all the show about the templars, crusades...ect on the hist channel are good evidence that he succeeded. Dan Brown admits to being a christian and is not bashing christianity in this book.
When did a personal viewpoint become wrong? Because it does not support your viewpoint..that would be wrong.

[graph]

Just to be the devil's advocate, if I write a book about flying people then it's accepted as a work of fiction, but as soon as I say the word Jesus your viewpoint is "clashing"?

I somewhere can meet you on a middle ground, though, Shelbay. I didn't see Passion of the Christ, because, well, it's nothing but Mel Gibson's self-indulgent crap. Different Strokes I guess.

[SomeGuy]

When did a personal viewpoint become wrong? Because it does not support your viewpoint..that would be wrong.

I dodnt mean to offend...Im just saying most fellow Christians misunderstand Browns concepts and the fact that its fiction...

[Shelbay]

I dodnt mean to offend...Im just saying most fellow Christians misunderstand Browns concepts and the fact that its fiction...
Thanks...I didn't take it as you offending me..you don't come across as that..once again I sometimes wish there was a "tone" that we could post with our words.:) I understand it being fiction but I didn't like it..but as you said..maybe people will become interested in Christian History. Maybe I should burn a good one and read it again..open my mind some ?:smokin:

[Shelbay]

Just to be the devil's advocate, if I write a book about flying people then it's accepted as a work of fiction, but as soon as I say the word Jesus your viewpoint is "clashing"?

I somewhere can meet you on a middle ground, though, Shelbay. I didn't see Passion of the Christ, because, well, it's nothing but Mel Gibson's self-indulgent crap. Different Strokes I guess.
I bought Passion Of the Christ..thats how much I enjoy it..and yes..different strokes for different folks..:thumbsup:

[Fabolous]

i think all these regions are all bounce of bull shit left and right. no matter what one your on...

fuck man why do you all ways have to praise god's name? and jesus ? i think it's all some bull shit that someone made up along time ago, just so he could become powerful and help rule over some people.

I bet there's more truth to these movie/book then what people maybe leave , that's the only reason that i can see why all these damn Cristen's wanna shut it down