PDA

View Full Version : The best thread in the universe times infinity.



God v2.0
04-21-2006, 03:25 AM
Okay I just came up with a really awesome idea, we should come up with a question, something that wouldnt take forever to answer but isnt a yes or no question (something that requires like at least 2-3 sentences as a response) then everyone asnwers the question while they are sober, then answer the question again when you're baked out of your fucking mind.

i dont want any stupid kids taking one hit of schwagg and posting some stupid half baked answer, i want people to get so high that you start to space out, come on we've all done the "stare off into space for 5 min" after the coughing fit right?

So step one we should think of a question or if you wanna use your own or someone elses then go ahead. But let the hilarity begin (hopefully) :thumbsup:

slipknotpsycho
04-21-2006, 03:28 AM
if you plug your asshole, with superglue and everything so that nothing can come out of that whole, no matter how much pressure there is, would the shit find somewhere else to escape, or would it make your intestines explode?

God v2.0
04-21-2006, 03:50 AM
you would die of fatal bowel blockage, and die.


wow im not even change that because it wasnt on purpose

if not that then it would probably end up backing up into your stomach and who knows maybe you'd start throwing up poop.........well theres a pleasent thought.

slipknotpsycho
04-21-2006, 04:06 AM
you would die of fatal bowel blockage, and die.


wow im not even change that because it wasnt on purpose

if not that then it would probably end up backing up into your stomach and who knows maybe you'd start throwing up poop.........well theres a pleasent thought.
strangely enough, i'd rather puke up some huge nasty tasteing pellet, then a whole bunch of liquid chunky looking vegetable soup.... and the least the shit would be alot easier to clean... a less 'hands on approach' if you know hwat i'm talking about...

Highness
04-21-2006, 04:11 AM
careful what you ask for you may get it hahhahhahhhaha.


heres a question, what if somewhere along the line of your earlier life you died and didnt realize it and all this is just a dream of you living, how would you know?

Jimmicrackedcorn
04-21-2006, 05:00 AM
Because you need to be living to dream, if you could dream you were living, then living is a dream, and death an illusion.

benagain
04-21-2006, 05:04 AM
careful what you ask for you may get it hahhahhahhhaha.


heres a question, what if somewhere along the line of your earlier life you died and didnt realize it and all this is just a dream of you living, how would you know?

I think you would prolly figure something out after you passed your 150th birthday and you didn't die (again).

Highness
04-21-2006, 05:06 AM
very good, that being said then you imply that there is no such thing as death or an end?

and if death is an illusion than what has us all avoiding it , like the parent scolding a child wanting to open an unexplored door, we know we shouldnt but we want to. And if living is a dream then how do we wake up and if we wake up what will we find?

Highness
04-21-2006, 05:08 AM
LOL @ benagain, yeah but thats a long time to wait to find out your life is but a dream hahahaha

potsmokingnome
04-21-2006, 05:09 AM
strangely enough, i'd rather puke up some huge nasty tasteing pellet, then a whole bunch of liquid chunky looking vegetable soup.... and the least the shit would be alot easier to clean... a less 'hands on approach' if you know hwat i'm talking about...
wow quite an interesting topic...a bit disturbing too.

benagain
04-21-2006, 05:13 AM
very good, that being said then you imply that there is no such thing as death or an end?

and if death is an illusion than what has us all avoiding it , like the parent scolding a child wanting to open an unexplored door, we know we shouldnt but we want to. And if living is a dream then how do we wake up and if we wake up what will we find?

We don't want to die (and we will die) because life is actually pretty fun. No one likes it when the party ends early. If you're talking about some sort or matrix style situation, then we would have to die to keep up the 'illusion'. The only way to get around this is if you're the only one in the dream. And that's pretty self centered of you :p I dunno. I'm a little stupid right now and I'm not stoned at all just tired so this will prolly make no sense in the morning.

Jimmicrackedcorn
04-21-2006, 05:29 AM
Now ure words are just wrapping around themselves, and on the whole make no sense, to die earlier on in life, then dream u were living, to wake up to being alive, but then you wouldn't have died earlier on in life, because to wake up alive, you would have had to have been alive when you went to sleep, as you would have just had a normal dream, and if life were a dream, and death a dream also, then there is no difference, so no point to answer the question, as the components are exactly the same thing. So whats the point of even asking if its a dream? Because according to that dreaming is living, and you could kill ureself at any time, just the free falling fear puts you off, no matter how much some1 scolds you, if you want it bad enough u'll open the door and tell the authority to fuck off no matter how much you are being beaten, depends if you think it'll be worth it.

Jimmicrackedcorn
04-21-2006, 05:44 AM
If you had the choice of loosing ure legs, or loosing ure penis, which would it be?

geonagual
04-21-2006, 05:48 AM
Wher am I? Why am I in this thread? I don/t even remeber what it is about. What? I hope that helps.

CaptainDankNuggets
04-21-2006, 05:52 AM
Nah dude that pretty Fukking stupid, just a waste of tme

benagain
04-21-2006, 05:52 AM
If you had the choice of loosing ure legs, or loosing ure penis, which would it be?

Definately my legs. I can get a weelchair, but without my pleasure pole, life just aint worth livin :thumbsup:

God v2.0
04-21-2006, 06:01 AM
Because you need to be living to dream, if you could dream you were living, then living is a dream, and death an illusion.

Are you dead? Then how would u know. and damn i am finally baked, ive been puffing on schwag all night and its still not that amazing of a high, a bowl of chronic could do a better job.

but i figured out how people got addicted to tobacco first, my theory is that some caveman or early human ate the leaves of the plant and got addicted, but i was wondering if tobacco was the first thing people smoked, i mean how long has pipe smoking been around? my guess, without googleing it is circa 3000 bce give or take 700 years, (im prolly WAY off) but i was just wondering why the fuck would someone inhale the smoke of a burning plant recreationally? seems like a weird idea, especially when lighters and matches didnt exist.

youd have to light your joint with a campfire, or a torch or something, so it was probably by accident that people first smoked anything. idk

i broke my own damn rule about not having long posts. wutever im high :stoned:

Jimmicrackedcorn
04-21-2006, 06:06 AM
just a waste of tme
You are jokin yeh?

Because if you were dead now, then this would be what death is, so saying that you would die, when ure already dead, would be redundant, and that thing at the end of death, would have to be called sumthin else.

Jimmicrackedcorn
04-21-2006, 06:08 AM
They probly burnt a pile of random leaves which created a lot of smoke that they accidentally inhaled, and like when ure a kid and spin round real fast, you wanna do it again, cuz its a wierd feelin (and organic tobacco fucks you up)

God v2.0
04-21-2006, 06:19 AM
wow i just realized.......nope i lost it, it had something to do with what we really are, it seems like all we are is a conscious energy wave pattern, that has been able to evolve physical bodies to interact with the new dimension of time, and the physical world. They were able to engineer reproduction to channel more inert energy into this 'state', and i use that word loosely, but this whole thing we call living and reality is just a combination of everything that conscious energy has experienced in this place, im prolly just high and this will make no sense in the morning heh. but when we die, its just because our physical bodies are worn out and can't sustain the consciousness anymore and the reason we dont remember things when we are "reborn" (even though im sure the universe or dimension that the conscious energy goes back to is kinda generic and so the energy is just 'added to the pool' and can no longer be distinguished as an individual.) is because the experiences we have in the physical reality can only be stored by a physical means, hence the brain.

Jimmicrackedcorn
04-21-2006, 06:29 AM
Light takes time to travel through space, you judge the here and now on what you see/hear/touch/smell. This means that when you look at the wall, you are seeing it slightly in the past, as it has changed during the period of time the light takes from initial departure, to arrival at the retina, then through all the neurological circuits in ure brain to be fedback and comprehended. So, if what you are perceiving as the present, is actually the past, then is what you judge to be the future, already happened?

GhostFace2K
04-21-2006, 08:11 AM
If you were in jail, and you had the choice to either be beat up every day (no avoiding it) or suck some dudes dick every day, which would u do?
(females obviously for u it'd be eating out another chick)

Highness
04-21-2006, 08:15 AM
You are jokin yeh?

Because if you were dead now, then this would be what death is, so saying that you would die, when ure already dead, would be redundant, and that thing at the end of death, would have to be called sumthin else.

witch was the exact point i was referring to, and my words didnt wrap themselves at all my words are thoughts pondering the question and looking for a way out or answer to the equation I stated. But bingo you went where my words where directing the train of thought to...witch is there must be something else. Witch is what my question seeks the answer for, what is that something else?

Highness
04-21-2006, 08:22 AM
Light takes time to travel through space, you judge the here and now on what you see/hear/touch/smell. This means that when you look at the wall, you are seeing it slightly in the past, as it has changed during the period of time the light takes from initial departure, to arrival at the retina, then through all the neurological circuits in ure brain to be fedback and comprehended. So, if what you are perceiving as the present, is actually the past, then is what you judge to be the future, already happened?



actually we are always in the present the past is our memory and the future is what we want to be or see...and you speak as if it takes forever for our brains to react to what we see but if your just staring at a wall it would'nt matter. the wall isnt in the future or past its in the present always, until it leaves your sight then it will become the past, and if you think about seeing the wall again then it will become the future, the future and the past are only a state of mind and the present is where everything meets even if only for a passing moment in actual time but the brain, doesnt measure time, only perception.

Highness
04-21-2006, 08:28 AM
wow i just realized.......nope i lost it, it had something to do with what we really are, it seems like all we are is a conscious energy wave pattern, that has been able to evolve physical bodies to interact with the new dimension of time, and the physical world. They were able to engineer reproduction to channel more inert energy into this 'state', and i use that word loosely, but this whole thing we call living and reality is just a combination of everything that conscious energy has experienced in this place, im prolly just high and this will make no sense in the morning heh. but when we die, its just because our physical bodies are worn out and can't sustain the consciousness anymore and the reason we dont remember things when we are "reborn" (even though im sure the universe or dimension that the conscious energy goes back to is kinda generic and so the energy is just 'added to the pool' and can no longer be distinguished as an individual.) is because the experiences we have in the physical reality can only be stored by a physical means, hence the brain.


Hey God I respect you but you offend me and your self and your credability when you say that ohh this is because Im high and it means nothing probably, when in all actuality the highness doesnt fuck your thought process up it actually makes it work better so why discredit your thought as if its not original just because your high. I feel what you said is fawking awesome and right on the mark for someone with good intellect and perception your statement is very valid and thoguht provoking and Im not high one bit right now.

Thats the problem I see with mankind is that most of them feel like there thoughts are worthless and meaningless hence they abandon them or give them no credulity at all hence these thoguhts will never have a chance to affect your reality adn bring you closer to what they truly reveal since you abandon them so. Or maybe you just do that publicly to keep your self humble in appereance so others might not see you with a blind eye and think you arrogant for thinking such elevated things.....its a shame, really......:(

God v2.0
04-21-2006, 08:31 AM
you must realize that parts of the elecromagnetic field theory and common perceptions of the theory of relativity are flawed. e=mc^2 basically says that you can convert matter to energy and energy to matter, and thats assuming the definition of energy is correct. Which it isn't. But I'll go over that at another point in time.

newayz im crashin, so peace out every1, night

God v2.0
04-21-2006, 08:33 AM
Hey God I respect you but you offend me and your self and your credability when you say that ohh this is because Im high and it means nothing probably, when in all actuality the highness doesnt fuck your thought process up it actually makes it work better so why discredit your thought as if its not original just because your high. I feel what you said is fawking awesome and right on the mark for someone with good intellect and perception your statement is very valid and thoguht provoking and Im not high one bit right now.

Thats the problem I see with mankind is that most of them feel like there thoughts are worthless and meaningless hence they abandon them or give them no credulity at all hence these thoguhts will never have a chance to affect your reality adn bring you closer to what they truly reveal since you abandon them so. Or maybe you just do that publicly to keep your self humble in appereance so others might not see you with a blind eye and think you arrogant for thinking such elevated things.....its a shame, really......:(


lol all i was saying was that sometimes i wake up in the morning and all teh shit i did was stupid. well goodnight:dance::mad::stoned::stoned::stoned::ston ed::stoned::stoned::stoned::stoned::stoned::stoned ::stoned::stoned::stoned::stoned::stoned::stoned:: stoned:

Highness
04-21-2006, 09:00 AM
sleep tight

Jimmicrackedcorn
04-21-2006, 01:15 PM
Common perceptions of the theory of relativity? what are you on about, the wall is seperate from you, its seperated by space, I don't need to know the ins and outs of relativity to understand that it takes time to traverse a space anywhere, for anything, and the fact that it would be a few millionths of a second to travel to ure eye, is irrelevant (since, those few millionths of a second exist, even if you can't concsiouly perceive them actually do exist, and are of significance somewhere), since once it reaches ure eye, it takes about 1/10 or so of a second, to activate the rods and cones, to which the impulse is sent, so even if relativity is wrong (which it probably is, but its a lot more proven than philosophy, which is based on nothing) it wouldn't matter, as light travels a long distance in a 1/10 of a second. Then maybe not the wall then, the stars for instance, you are gazing back in to the past, look at the moon and you are seeing it, yes in the here and now, for ure perception, but the light from the moon, is 2/3 mins old, whatever it is u r seeing, manifested 2/3 minutes ago, which was what I was talking about. And the present, past and future are a bit more than a state of mind, I'm not talking of your perception of those three things, I'm talking about those three things in general. As concepts that are as real as the other side of the world, jus cuz I can't see that at the moment, doesn't mean time ceases to exist there. And if our brains are measures of perception, and perception is the realization of the outside world, and time encompasses the outside world, we do measure time, because well, I'm seeing shit right now, and its moving, unless I am the manifestation of the unconcsious thought of my own being (and wha the fuck does that mean?), but I've never agreed with that, becuz you can pretty much falsify any theory on the physical, if its all in ure head, and its a lil bit pretentious to say you make ureself exist basically, but obviously could be right cuz no1's got a fuckin clue whats goin on, but I doubt its definitely one or the other, and probly a mix.

And please, I REALLY want you to get in to why relativity, and why the definition of energy is flawed. I haven't read that book in a while, and I need my memory refreshing, re-reading it with the outlook that it is flawed, would be interesting.

benagain
04-21-2006, 02:06 PM
Ok I got one for ya:
If we were created/evolved, then why were we not created/evolved into having the ability to scratch the dead center of our backs? I have an itch thats killing me. I can touch everywhere else on my body except the center of my back. What's that all about?

BobBong
04-21-2006, 03:33 PM
Ok I got one for ya:
If we were created/evolved, then why were we not created/evolved into having the ability to scratch the dead center of our backs? I have an itch thats killing me. I can touch everywhere else on my body except the center of my back. What's that all about?

simple, you body isn't flexible enough, your mind? maybe...I can scratch my back no problem.. but then.. i don't have a normal body..

benagain
04-21-2006, 03:47 PM
simple, you body isn't flexible enough, your mind? maybe...I can scratch my back no problem.. but then.. i don't have a normal body..

Lucky you then. i just need an extra few inches on my arm and I would be set :D Till then I'll just have to keep using sticks like monkey. Sun burn is a bitch.

friendowl
04-21-2006, 03:56 PM
why is ok to show vaginas and breasts in movies
but you rarely see penis's.
im sure that women would love to see a big dick on screen
but you never see that shit.
can you tell me why

minnesota man
04-21-2006, 04:09 PM
I would get beat up everyday. Fight back, yeah, maybe till I'm dead. I'd rather die than suck dick, not that whoever does is bad or anything.

As for taping up the mud hole, I bet, it would mess up all your organs down there because your intenstines would break open. Any pothead doctors online?

MaryJaneintheCloset
04-21-2006, 06:39 PM
why is ok to show vaginas and breasts in movies
but you rarely see penis's.
im sure that women would love to see a big dick on screen
but you never see that shit.
can you tell me why

I think that's a damn good question. :stoned:

friendowl
04-21-2006, 06:47 PM
any ideas why,anybody

Highness
04-21-2006, 06:48 PM
why is ok to show vaginas and breasts in movies
but you rarely see penis's.
im sure that women would love to see a big dick on screen
but you never see that shit.
can you tell me why


I think its because that falls into the same category as watching 2 gay guys make out is not accepted and as enjoying as watching to women go at it.

Just like the rule in highschool why is it that if a guy goes and screws many girls hes a gigolo a badass but if a woman does it shes a whore lol.

Highness
04-21-2006, 06:50 PM
Common perceptions of the theory of relativity? what are you on about, the wall is seperate from you, its seperated by space, I don't need to know the ins and outs of relativity to understand that it takes time to traverse a space anywhere, for anything, and the fact that it would be a few millionths of a second to travel to ure eye, is irrelevant (since, those few millionths of a second exist, even if you can't concsiouly perceive them actually do exist, and are of significance somewhere), since once it reaches ure eye, it takes about 1/10 or so of a second, to activate the rods and cones, to which the impulse is sent, so even if relativity is wrong (which it probably is, but its a lot more proven than philosophy, which is based on nothing) it wouldn't matter, as light travels a long distance in a 1/10 of a second. Then maybe not the wall then, the stars for instance, you are gazing back in to the past, look at the moon and you are seeing it, yes in the here and now, for ure perception, but the light from the moon, is 2/3 mins old, whatever it is u r seeing, manifested 2/3 minutes ago, which was what I was talking about. And the present, past and future are a bit more than a state of mind, I'm not talking of your perception of those three things, I'm talking about those three things in general. As concepts that are as real as the other side of the world, jus cuz I can't see that at the moment, doesn't mean time ceases to exist there. And if our brains are measures of perception, and perception is the realization of the outside world, and time encompasses the outside world, we do measure time, because well, I'm seeing shit right now, and its moving, unless I am the manifestation of the unconcsious thought of my own being (and wha the fuck does that mean?), but I've never agreed with that, becuz you can pretty much falsify any theory on the physical, if its all in ure head, and its a lil bit pretentious to say you make ureself exist basically, but obviously could be right cuz no1's got a fuckin clue whats goin on, but I doubt its definitely one or the other, and probly a mix.

And please, I REALLY want you to get in to why relativity, and why the definition of energy is flawed. I haven't read that book in a while, and I need my memory refreshing, re-reading it with the outlook that it is flawed, would be interesting.

hey good stuff man!!!! Im not even gonna try to phase that you were rollin with it man!!!! Mwuhahahahaha :thumbsup:

Highness
04-21-2006, 06:54 PM
any ideas why,anybody


Its wierd but its like naked woman is accepted more by the world as beauty or an artform by the majority anyway I suppose and a big dick reguardless if its beautiful or exiting is accepted more like pornography, well thats my take on any way by the way they treat the subject from my observations.

who knows maybe its all just a big conspiracy:D

friendowl
04-21-2006, 07:04 PM
i think it cuz most men deep down are very very
self-conscious about their dicks.
imagine if there was a male movie star like say
brad pitt or denzel washinton.
girls see these movies cuz the guys are good looking.
bettar than there man
what if these guys that women are attracted to also
removed there clothes and showed that there dick was
a lot better than the husband or boyfriend.
it would make the male feel insecure if he was built small
pretty soon lil dicks would be unacceptable and 90% of the country
will file for divorce.
imagine george bush watching a movie with barbara when denzel whips
out a big black dick then when georgie trys to fuck later that night she's
gonna remember the big dick and then look at his lil one and laugh her ass off.

Highness
04-22-2006, 01:46 PM
hhahaha hell even if its not true thats hella hilarious man mWUHaHaHahAhHAa

geonagual
04-22-2006, 02:40 PM
i think it cuz most men deep down are very very
self-conscious about their dicks.
imagine if there was a male movie star like say
brad pitt or denzel washinton.
girls see these movies cuz the guys are good looking.
bettar than there man
what if these guys that women are attracted to also
removed there clothes and showed that there dick was
a lot better than the husband or boyfriend.
it would make the male feel insecure if he was built small
pretty soon lil dicks would be unacceptable and 90% of the country
will file for divorce.
imagine george bush watching a movie with barbara when denzel whips
out a big black dick then when georgie trys to fuck later that night she's
gonna remember the big dick and then look at his lil one and laugh her ass off.

don't porno got all of this covered. George Bush watching Denzel Washington in a porno. lol. Then fuckin Barbara...ewwwww

geonagual
04-22-2006, 02:43 PM
I think your dream of having the "best thread in the Universe times Infinity", has happened. Congratulations:thumbsup:

God v2.0
05-02-2006, 10:28 PM
lol this thread is awesome, except the part about denzel's penis........yuck......


well if that ever did happen friendowl i would still be fine, im build like a porn star down there. i guess all those years of trying to stretch it out manually really paid off huh?!

God v2.0
05-02-2006, 11:36 PM
Common perceptions of the theory of relativity? what are you on about, the wall is seperate from you, its seperated by space, I don't need to know the ins and outs of relativity to understand that it takes time to traverse a space anywhere, for anything, and the fact that it would be a few millionths of a second to travel to ure eye, is irrelevant (since, those few millionths of a second exist, even if you can't concsiouly perceive them actually do exist, and are of significance somewhere), since once it reaches ure eye, it takes about 1/10 or so of a second, to activate the rods and cones, to which the impulse is sent, so even if relativity is wrong (which it probably is, but its a lot more proven than philosophy, which is based on nothing) it wouldn't matter, as light travels a long distance in a 1/10 of a second. Then maybe not the wall then, the stars for instance, you are gazing back in to the past, look at the moon and you are seeing it, yes in the here and now, for ure perception, but the light from the moon, is 2/3 mins old, whatever it is u r seeing, manifested 2/3 minutes ago, which was what I was talking about. And the present, past and future are a bit more than a state of mind, I'm not talking of your perception of those three things, I'm talking about those three things in general. As concepts that are as real as the other side of the world, jus cuz I can't see that at the moment, doesn't mean time ceases to exist there. And if our brains are measures of perception, and perception is the realization of the outside world, and time encompasses the outside world, we do measure time, because well, I'm seeing shit right now, and its moving, unless I am the manifestation of the unconcsious thought of my own being (and wha the fuck does that mean?), but I've never agreed with that, becuz you can pretty much falsify any theory on the physical, if its all in ure head, and its a lil bit pretentious to say you make ureself exist basically, but obviously could be right cuz no1's got a fuckin clue whats goin on, but I doubt its definitely one or the other, and probably a mix.

And please, I REALLY want you to get in to why relativity, and why the definition of energy is flawed. I haven't read that book in a while, and I need my memory refreshing, re-reading it with the outlook that it is flawed, would be interesting.


OK OK I'll go ahead and give you my valuable time for FREE and explain the theories I've come up with, they aren't nearly complete in any sense, in fact I have barely even begun to scratch the surface, which by definition in my theory is one of many MANY surfaces.

If you've read my post on the holographic universe theory then you'd be able to understand this all a little better. http://www.rense.com/general69/holoff.htm

Now assuming they are on the right track, the universe is a very complex and can be viewed from many different perspectives and look different from each one.


You should also know about the zero point theory as well. Its a field of energy that is everywhere at once. Responsible for time and gravity and electromagnetic field dynamics.

Also let me tell you why I think the definition of energy is incorrect. It's defined as the capacity for doing work. Its a well defined word and means exactly what it says in the scientific context. But in reality, all 'energy' is actually the potential to do work. The work and any changes caused by electricity are an effect and not actual energy.
This is how matter can also be energy, matter is actually supercompressed energy, and the more you compress it the more it changes, which is what gives us elements. which also means that out table of elements is a very meger list of all the possible forms of compressed energy. There are alot of different kinds of energy and so there could be billions of different elements under certain conditions.

But the fact that zero point enegy exists where there should be absolutly ZERO energy means that our perception that physical and energetic materials are seperate is quite wrong.
Here's an excellent way to define ZP energy "The origin of a minimal energy that isn't zero can be intuitively understood in terms of the Heisenberg uncertainty principle (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heisenberg_uncertainty_principle). This principle states that the position and the momentum (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Momentum) of a quantum mechanical particle cannot both be known arbitrarily accurately. If the particle is confined to a potential well (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Potential_well), then its position is at least partly known: it must be within the well. Thus, one may deduce that within the well, the particle cannot have zero momentum, as otherwise the uncertainty principle would be violated. It is well known that the energy of a moving particle is proportional to the square of its momentum: this is the kinetic energy (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kinetic_energy) of the particle. Thus, we deduce that the kinetic energy of the particle cannot be zero without violating the uncertainty principle, and so have a simple, intuitive picture of the zero-point energy: it is the vibration of a trapped particle, a vibration that cannot be removed."

zero point energy can be observed in the casimir effect http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Casimir_effect

ZP causes mass, gravity, and possibly even time. think about a 3 dimensional universe, now think of a giant field of energy, kinda like a big pool filled with water, but every partical of waster is moving so fast that its generally everwhere at once. so its pushing on everything equally at once. but say that one 'ray' or patical of this ZP energy were to go through a planet, now if you know your stuff then you know that matter is just empty space with a few dots matter every now and then, the partical (or one out of the trillions that go through us and everything else every nanosecond) MAY intersect with an atom thus slowing it down or stoping it (getting absorbed by the matter) so if you think about it logically its not suprising that there is more pressure coming down from on top of us than from the bottom of us because a little bit is being intersected by the ground under out feet but we get the full force from space.


also im sure EVERYONE here knows what static electricity is, this is energy captured by earths EM field from the sun. devices can harness and transmit this energy through the air like radio waves, or you could build small but effiecent harvesters to power individual devices. this is one of many examples of ways that it would be very easy to make petroleum obsolete, but try telling this to someone who has 50 million sunk into oil investments.:mad:

but if you read the page about the holographic universe, they did a study in the '80s and found that sub atomic particals can communicate instantly over any distance; making the assumtion that nothing can travel at speeds greater than light a moot and voided point.

so we come to wonder if objective reality, or the physical world as you probably know it, is even real in the way we though it was.

one thing ive come to conclude is that its impossible to put a definition on anything, unless you were to also define its position in space time. because everything, is also everything else. we are all made of the same generic building block (energy).

i also came up with my own personal theory for why drugs affect us. because there are so many different facets of perception in the universe and our brain chemistry is what filters what we see, so when you add a chemical you can change the filter, or add to it, or take away from it and this changes your viewable critera of the universe. So when you're hallucinating, ive noticed this on salvia the most, you are still looking at the universe and it is real, but you may not be able to interact with it or do anything more than see it, hear it, feel it etc. I think this is true because our brains recieve a massive amount of information from our senses on MANY differnent frequencies, but it processes and changes this information so that you can recognize it as a sound or a taste or pain. So how can reality by real, and a hallucination caused by an extra chemical in your brain. You are still recieving a visual stimulatopm or an audiable stimulation, whats causing it if its not external? on shrooms i usually see stuff from my memory incorporated into physical objects. but on salvia its a rollercoaster of emotions and vivid hallucinating, which can range from seeing things that arent there in our reality to living out an entire life within a 10 min timeframe.

salvia is the most powerfull drug known to me. and ive done acid. and acid was lame compared to salvia. acid is still alot more 'fun' than salvia tho.



well i kinda fizzled out there, maybe i'll get some more steam later on and post some additional theories, but im sure nobody wants to read my stupid ideas, you have ideas of your own dontcha?

God v2.0
05-02-2006, 11:39 PM
more good sites for info on ZPE http://www.zpenergy.com/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=663

geonagual
05-03-2006, 04:36 AM
This is still by far
The best thread in the universe times infinity
No doubt:thumbsup: