Guy creates water powered car, with videos!

[activedenial]

The first video is of dan dingel, a filipino inventor who shows the device, and demonstrates it for everyone. The second video is of stan meyer. He had patents for his water electrolyser, but he was killed by assassins when his project was about to hit the market. How sad, we could be running our cars on tap water, if not for greedy oil traders.:mad:

DAN DINGEL VIDEO
http://www.3dloyola.com/page3/dingle.htm#_self
--------------------------

STAN MEYER VIDEOS
http://waterpoweredcar.com/equinox3StanleyMeyer.WMV
http://ia300132.us.archive.org/3/items/Water_Powered_Car_video/watercar.mov

[Whos Carl]

This was posted a few weeks ago. The outcome of that thread was that everyone realised that it was a hoax and the guy that "invented" the car got sued and died.

SOrry to spoil your fun but its not real.

[activedenial]

How can it be a hoax when hydrogen is a fact. It is easy to split hydrogen from water, all you need are carbon rods, water and a current. He has patents for his machines so how can it be a hoax? Plus hydrogen from water is nothing new it was invented in 1800's. We are using fossil fuels, that doesn't mean hydrogen is a hoax! WTF?:what:

[activedenial]

Do you see my avatar? That is me splitting water into hydrogen with a carbon arc. HA HA! Bet nobody knew that! it's patented, and it's called bingo fuel!

[Az.]

lol :)

i thought there was a problem with creating water powered cars....somthing about it becoming a hydrogen bomb or somthing?

[Wesley Pipes]

i know a guy whos inventing a car that runs on air, it only needs an electrical charge to start it then ur set :D, and no this aint bullshit cause he has a fully funtional small scale version :D

[esrabalamir]

lol :)

i thought there was a problem with creating water powered cars....somthing about it becoming a hydrogen bomb or somthing?
lol
yeah water powered cars are not productive, they must develop it alittle bit more

[activedenial]

i know a guy whos inventing a car that runs on air, it only needs an electrical charge to start it then ur set :D, and no this aint bullshit cause he has a fully funtional small scale version :D


Yes that is a good idea! But it has already been produced. Here is the webpage.

http://www.theaircar.com/
Here is proof that it works!:stoned:
http://www.popsci.com/popsci/how20/63599aa138b84010vgnvcm1000004eecbccdrcrd.html
http://www.geocities.com/hydrogenpower1/experiments/experiments_index.html
http://www.scitoys.com/board/messages/9/49.html?1100055552
http://www.lutec.com.au/
http://www.theodoregray.com/PeriodicTable/Stories/001.1/index.html

[420ultimatesmokage]

it takes more energy to split the water then you get back from it. one couldn't get any energy from the system due to the law of conservation of energy. what you put in is what you get back out. there are no such thing as free energy machines.

[420ultimatesmokage]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Water_fuel_cell

[BaseRSX]

it takes more energy to split the water then you get back from it. one couldn't get any energy from the system due to the law of conservation of energy. what you put in is what you get back out. there are no such thing as free energy machines.

Exactly.

He says "It is easy to split hydrogen from water; all you need are carbon rods, water and a current."

So he himself is admitting that the car is not running on water or hydrogen but carbon, hydrogen from water and the "current" it takes to get the hydrogen out of the water in the first place. And that current has to come from some place, the wall etc. Which of course is originally made from burning coal in most cities and countries.

One of the first laws of physics is what you just said, what you put in is what you get back out.

[420ultimatesmokage]

who lets a little law get in their way:D

[activedenial]

it takes more energy to split the water then you get back from it. one couldn't get any energy from the system due to the law of conservation of energy. what you put in is what you get back out. there are no such thing as free energy machines.

They tapped into whats called zero point energy. The law of thermodynamics doesn't apply, watch the video. He is getting more than whats put in.

Nasa is now understanding what bob lazar has said the whole time, we need to utilize the gravitational field. NASA explains here. Riding the gravitational wave.

http://nmp.jpl.nasa.gov/st7/index.html:thumbsup:

[activedenial]

Exactly.

He says "It is easy to split hydrogen from water; all you need are carbon rods, water and a current."

So he himself is admitting that the car is not running on water or hydrogen but carbon, hydrogen from water and the "current" it takes to get the hydrogen out of the water in the first place.


Who said the car is running on carbon. HA!!!:p That is the simple experiment to show you how it's done. You need 316 steel with 1.5 mm spacing plates to utilize hydrogen more efficiently

[420ultimatesmokage]

that link doesn't work is this what you are talking about http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zero_point_energy

[activedenial]

http://nmp.jpl.nasa.gov/st7/index.html

Here it is:)

[BaseRSX]

Who said the car is running on carbon. HA!!!:p That is the simple experiment to show you how it's done. You need 316 steel with 1.5 mm spacing plates to utilize hydrogen more efficiently

Whatever dude. The fact is there is no way you could have a self contained engine that could generate enough power to move a car with nothing but water being used. That engine would need an additional power source to get the hydrogen out of the water. Therefore in the very best case scenario it is no different than the current hydrogen engines being developed by Honda, Toyota, etc.

And of course the fact that some guy made it by himself means it would be hundreds of time LESS efficient than those hydrogen engines. Hence it is a hoax.

[420ultimatesmokage]

i read the links, most of them being about electrolysis and hydrogen which proves nothing. i read the nasa thing to, all that is used for is precision measurements for space flight trajectories and measuring objects mass. did you even read anything you posted.