Log in

View Full Version : another 9/11 cover up video



endo..jay
01-12-2006, 11:26 PM
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-2023320890224991194&q


just another 9/11 cover up video i thought it was interesting...course im stoned:smokin:

Anonymous
01-12-2006, 11:56 PM
was good

pabloescobar209
01-13-2006, 12:35 AM
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-2023320890224991194&q


just another 9/11 cover up video i thought it was interesting...course im stoned:smokin:
good video

eg420ne
01-13-2006, 12:42 AM
Im watching it now, but have seen so many, Im sure the CONFORMIST will come out and say it all disinfo because there govt says so...Just because it has AJ name on it. :D

Psycho4Bud
01-13-2006, 12:44 AM
LOL...I knew it! Alex Jones strikes again....and for a low, low cost of $19.95 you to can own the home copy!!!! All that and the Remco potato peeler...operators are waiting for your calls!!! Just dial 1-800-dumb-ass!!! :thumbsup:

Psycho4Bud
01-13-2006, 12:45 AM
Im watching it now, but have seen so many, Im sure the CONFORMIST will come out and say it all disinfo because there govt says so.... :D

So hows my friend from the left? LOL :dance:

eg420ne
01-13-2006, 12:46 AM
I knew it ----LoL---- fixing to roll 1 up

Psycho4Bud
01-13-2006, 12:47 AM
Sorry dude, I meant DISSENTER . LOL.... :thumbsup:

Psycho4Bud
01-13-2006, 12:49 AM
Keep this one on the top people...if we're all lucky...we'll have a visit by.........

CONSPIRACY MAN!!!

eg420ne
01-13-2006, 12:51 AM
Sorry dude, I meant DISSENTER . LOL.... :thumbsup:
Thats better---lol

VoidLivesOn
01-13-2006, 12:51 AM
I think the title of this thread is pretty self explanatory.

"ANOTHER 9/11 cover up video"

eg420ne
01-13-2006, 12:51 AM
And just think pisshead didnt even post it........im sure it be moved to politic forum

Psycho4Bud
01-13-2006, 12:52 AM
Thats better---lol

Hey bro, we may be on the opposite side of the political fence but I'll give a roll and share the joint anytime! Have a good toke!!! :thumbsup: :rasta:

eg420ne
01-13-2006, 12:55 AM
Hey bro, we may be on the opposite side of the political fence but I'll give a roll and share the joint anytime! Have a good toke!!! :thumbsup: :rasta:
Sounds like a plan :rasta:

king kong bong
01-13-2006, 12:56 AM
here i am....conspiracy man.

Psycho4Bud
01-13-2006, 12:58 AM
here i am....conspiracy man.


Naaa, Pissy is CONSPIRACY MAN. You'd have to be like Robin or some shit like that...trusty side kick, thats it! Maybe PARANOIA BOY? :thumbsup:

king kong bong
01-13-2006, 01:00 AM
fuck that, im nobodys sidekick. ill be conspirator man then.

Psycho4Bud
01-13-2006, 01:01 AM
fuck that, im nobodys sidekick. ill be conspirator man then.

Anarchy in the ranks!!! I got $20.00 on ya dude!! :thumbsup:

king kong bong
01-13-2006, 01:04 AM
anyone else want a piece of the action?

eg420ne
01-13-2006, 01:10 AM
Hey this dude Jimmy Walters is offering 100million dollars if any1 can prove the government official version of what happened on that day.....

king kong bong
01-13-2006, 01:12 AM
i think i heard about that.

Psycho4Bud
01-13-2006, 01:13 AM
Hey this dude Jimmy Walters is offering 100million dollars if any1 can prove the government official version of what happened on that day.....

Here ya go King....SOUNDS LIKE A JOB FOR................


CONSPIRACY MAN!!! :thumbsup:

king kong bong
01-13-2006, 01:18 AM
how should i go about my investigation? should i take the subtle route or just grab some top ranking guy and beat it out of him?

eg420ne
01-13-2006, 01:18 AM
Here ya go King....SOUNDS LIKE A JOB FOR................


CONSPIRACY MAN!!! :thumbsup:
If you can prove it make sure you donate some of that money to Cannabis.com :thumbsup:

king kong bong
01-13-2006, 01:20 AM
hell, i'll throw a cannanis.com shindig. free weed for everyone, even for the DEA.

eg420ne
01-13-2006, 01:22 AM
how should i go about my investigation? should i take the subtle route or just grab some top ranking guy and beat it out of him?
You got me dude......I perfer beating the crap out of a few ranking people doh-And i ask them about OKC & Waco & JFK while im at it......

king kong bong
01-13-2006, 01:25 AM
well i know the c.i.a. is in charge of the political conspiracies and the n.s.a. is in charge of the alien stuff. i think i'll hit up the n.s.a. first.

Psycho4Bud
01-13-2006, 01:27 AM
You got me dude......I perfer beating the crap out of a few ranking people doh-And i ask them about OKC & Waco & JFK while im at it......

Hey dude, you got to have special "CONSPIRACY MAN" clearance before you can take shots at officials!!! :thumbsup:

Psycho4Bud
01-13-2006, 01:27 AM
well i know the c.i.a. is in charge of the political conspiracies and the n.s.a. is in charge of the alien stuff. i think i'll hit up the n.s.a. first.

UP, UP, AND AWAY!!!!!!!!!!!

eg420ne
01-13-2006, 01:31 AM
LOL----- psycho :smokin:

king kong bong
01-13-2006, 01:32 AM
nah i dont fly, im king kong, i climb buildings.

Psycho4Bud
01-13-2006, 02:02 AM
nah i dont fly, im king kong, i climb buildings.

Watch out for the planes!!! :stoned:

scobbie
01-13-2006, 02:02 AM
people should watch this and then pass it on to everyone they know people dont know the other side of this story they just think it happened,simple. I know i did until i saw this video, fuckin mind boggling. somebody is tellin porkys :mad: :confused: :mad: :mad: :mad:

Psycho4Bud
01-13-2006, 02:04 AM
people should watch this and then pass it on to everyone they know people dont know the other side of this story they just think it happened,simple. I know i did until i saw this video, fuckin mind boggling. somebody is tellin porkys :mad: :confused: :mad: :mad: :mad:


Ya got potential!!! King Kong is looking for a sidekick I hear. :thumbsup:

smoke ranger
01-13-2006, 02:24 AM
made some great points in the documentary, I watched the whole thing and took notes, this is subject is of importance to me, I lost some family in the WTC

*light polls and telephone polls supposedly bent down by low flying aircraft and explosion at lentagon were bent the wrong direction and ripped from the ground
*no debris from a full sized Boeing 747 or any passenger aircraft
*tarp coverend box being taken from the scene was never explained
*CNN reported there was no evidence of a plane, no debris, and Boeing wouldnt speak on the matter involving certain plane parst found at the scene

I have four more pages but I dont feel like typing that much right now, Ill finish tomorrow for those at work or in a bind and dont have and hour to watch the film!!

Psycho4Bud
01-13-2006, 02:37 AM
made some great points in the documentary, I watched the whole thing and took notes, this is subject is of importance to me, I lost some family in the WTC

*light polls and telephone polls supposedly bent down by low flying aircraft and explosion at lentagon were bent the wrong direction and ripped from the ground

Back draft can be a bitch!

*no debris from a full sized Boeing 747 or any passenger aircraft

If ol' Alex Jones showed ya that he'd be out $19.95 on the video.

*tarp coverend box being taken from the scene was never explained

Maybe the black box....maybe something sensitive to relatives!
*CNN reported there was no evidence of a plane, no debris, and Boeing wouldnt speak on the matter involving certain plane parst found at the scene

There are a lot of picks of debris, just that the conspiracy people think that an entire plane should be parked in the Pentagon after smashing through layers of concrete at over 500 mph. I guess it wasn't an indestructable version.

I have four more pages but I dont feel like typing that much right now, Ill finish tomorrow for those at work or in a bind and dont have and hour to watch the film!!

Always good to keep the options open I guess. Just don't put to much into it! :thumbsup:

king kong bong
01-14-2006, 01:01 AM
the size of the hole in the pentagon was chuffin tiny, no way a 747 made such little damage. i hate those diagrams in defense of the "official" story, pure bollocks.

Smokey McPot
01-14-2006, 03:32 AM
The pentagon theory is interesting. The WTC isnt. what is this video trying to tell us? Our government did this or what? Sounds like this guy is anti american and bush. He mentioned numerous buildings that have burnt for hours and never fallen yet the WTC was burning for less than an hour and fell. HELLO! the god damn building was hit by a 747 with a full tank of gas going over 500 mph. The speed of impact itself is going to cause alot of damage. Thats why the buildings fell so quickly. THey werent just on fire they were hit by a massive moving bomb flown by people.

The power of this explosion is so mind bogeling that it is hard to tell why some odd things happended on different floors of the building.

Our govt. didnt plan this. If other explosions were planned it certainly wasnt by us, it was by terrorists.

This guy is like micheal moore. I think he is just taking facts and turning it into a video to make a scene about the US.

Swizzy89304
01-14-2006, 04:09 AM
OK, so you say that the towers collapsed because of burning jet fuel. Explain this then (taken from the video). You can search for it yourself it for don't believe me - just point the video to 22 mins, 30 seconds.

smoke ranger
01-14-2006, 05:27 AM
http://www.wimp.com/whatever/

king kong bong
01-14-2006, 11:01 PM
The pentagon theory is interesting. The WTC isnt. what is this video trying to tell us? Our government did this or what? Sounds like this guy is anti american and bush. He mentioned numerous buildings that have burnt for hours and never fallen yet the WTC was burning for less than an hour and fell. HELLO! the god damn building was hit by a 747 with a full tank of gas going over 500 mph. The speed of impact itself is going to cause alot of damage. Thats why the buildings fell so quickly. THey werent just on fire they were hit by a massive moving bomb flown by people.

The power of this explosion is so mind bogeling that it is hard to tell why some odd things happended on different floors of the building.

Our govt. didnt plan this. If other explosions were planned it certainly wasnt by us, it was by terrorists.

This guy is like micheal moore. I think he is just taking facts and turning it into a video to make a scene about the US.

why do you label the guy as being anti-american and anti-bush? just cuz he didnt buy the "official" story and asks questions and began his own investigation? facist much?

scobbie
01-15-2006, 12:01 AM
seen it how can they get away with that man as far as im concerned they are bang to rights on it ,they are caught no answers !

Miss Green
01-15-2006, 02:46 AM
It's all there right infront of you people that think that the so called terrorist did this right from the planes hitting the trade centre to the way the buildings fell which was done like a professional building was "pulled" down and then with the pentagon there is no way a 747 could of done that no way in the world there could of been a plane.How about trying to look else where like your own government I was totally shocked at the way bush handled the whole situation at the school I mean seriously if bushy can't handle the heat then he should get out of the kitchen because instead of protecting his so called country that he supposedly loves we curled up like a cat and read stories to the children when he should of said I've got important business to attend you will see it on the news tonight not sit on his butt and read kids books.The way he actually handle the situation was shameful and so he should have his head between his legs ...............shameful. :mad:

Breukelen advocaat
01-15-2006, 06:35 AM
It's all there right infront of you people that think that the so called terrorist did this right from the planes hitting the trade centre to the way the buildings fell which was done like a professional building was "pulled" down and then with the pentagon there is no way a 747 could of done that no way in the world there could of been a plane.How about trying to look else where like your own government I was totally shocked at the way bush handled the whole situation at the school I mean seriously if bushy can't handle the heat then he should get out of the kitchen because instead of protecting his so called country that he supposedly loves we curled up like a cat and read stories to the children when he should of said I've got important business to attend you will see it on the news tonight not sit on his butt and read kids books.The way he actually handle the situation was shameful and so he should have his head between his legs ...............shameful. :mad:

Are you an architect? After witnessing the events in NYC on 9/11 first hand, I met one (architect) in the subway, shortly before the towers fell. He told me what was going to happen: How they were built to implode and collapse straight down, and he was 100% correct.

One more thing: Either Bush was involved in the attacks, or he wasn't. If you say that he didn't "handle" the situation correctly ("shameful") when informed of the attacks, then it does not make any sense to insinuate that he knew about, or even ordered, them in the first place. I mean, come on! If he WAS complicit in the attack(s), then what is it you expected from him after they took place? Wouldn't he have devised a better plan of action than the way he appeard in that classroom? Oh yeah, it was all part of the "plot".

Please, if you can, elaborate on what a mass-murderer is supposed to do after his plan is enacted that is NOT "shameful" - other than confess.

scobbie
01-15-2006, 05:06 PM
what happened to flight 93 ,this is the lockerbie crash site in scotland 1998 a bomb exploded at 31.000 feet and look at the damage it done in lockerbie if flight 93 came down were they said it did were is the wreckage as i was quite neer lokerbay and seen the damage it didnt leave a little hole like flight93, and psyco ill have that job mate lol,lol.

scobbie
01-15-2006, 05:07 PM
the lockerby plane was a 747 pentagon was a 757 is that not a bigger plane

Raiden
01-15-2006, 05:28 PM
Yeah it's total insanity- look at the lengths they got to so they can have an excuse to lay their oil pipe lines around the world, just so they can pump their cars full of petrol and fuck the environment up even more. It's the middle of January here and it should be freezing, and what are they doing about it? go round thieving petrol of other countries to put in their SUVs. WTF is the world coming to.

amsterdam
01-15-2006, 05:46 PM
That was the funniest video I have seen in a long time. It seemed like a 12 year old made. Oh well, simple answers for simple people.

mfactor420
01-15-2006, 06:48 PM
the lockerby plane was a 747 pentagon was a 757 is that not a bigger plane


757 is not necessarily a bigger plane because it has a higher number. I've noticed numerous posts here about how the planes hitting the towers were 747's. I don't care what video you look at, the planes were twin engine under the wing - definitely not 747's. 747's have four engines under the wings. No wonder it is so hard to find the truth about this as those of us recounting the tale can't even recount it accurately. Seems maybe the real culprits were counting on this.

In any event scobbie is right - shouldn't there be alot more damage from a plane that size, especially when previous crash sites justify this? :confused:

pisshead
01-15-2006, 06:58 PM
Im watching it now, but have seen so many, Im sure the CONFORMIST will come out and say it all disinfo because there govt says so...Just because it has AJ name on it. :D
this video has nothing to do with alex jones too...it's mislabeled...it's by dylan avery. i don't know if anyone pointed that out.

mfactor420
01-15-2006, 06:58 PM
Yeah it's total insanity- look at the lengths they got to so they can have an excuse to lay their oil pipe lines around the world, just so they can pump their cars full of petrol and fuck the environment up even more. It's the middle of January here and it should be freezing, and what are they doing about it? go round thieving petrol of other countries to put in their SUVs. WTF is the world coming to.

What I want to know is who is feeding Bush a bunch of crap telling him it is ok to keep burning oil & gas, knowing it is harmful to the environment and yet telling him it is all right, it won't hurt at all. :confused:

How much longer will we allow the facade to go on unchecked? I find this thought interesting (found it in another post):

What if the people actually discovered it was all a conspiracy? What if the elections were bogus? Would the people then bring into question all previous events? In other words if 9/11 was an American lead attack, what else has the American government lied to us about? If Bush cheated his way into office 2x, who else cheated? Surely Bush knows that the bigger a lie gets, the harder it is to stop and eventually the truth is revealed. :)

So what really happened? :confused:

mfactor420
01-15-2006, 07:01 PM
this video has nothing to do with alex jones too...it's mislabeled...it's by dylan avery. i don't know if anyone pointed that out.

Ok pisshead, (sounding like psycho4bud) now tell us Dylan Avery and Alex Jones aren't connected in some way. :thumbsup:

Not that I don't believe what you post - I appreciate the alternative viewpoint and the questions it raises. :)

pisshead
01-15-2006, 07:04 PM
okay, they aren't connected, other than what the subjects they discuss...there are many many many people out there talking about this that have never heard of alex jones...

i was just pointing it out that the video was mislabeled...

pisshead
01-15-2006, 07:09 PM
i'm conflicted as to what extent our actions influence the earth's heating and cooling...i lean more towards this though i think...i think we're in a general cooling cycle, with spikes of heat waves that last hundreds of years...

Visit to Greenland May Chill Hot Air Hoax

American Free Press/Jack Phillips | December 22 2005 (http://www.americanfreepress.net/html/visit_to_greenland.html)


SCORESBYSUND, GREENLAND??Mainstream newspaper, Internet and TV reports claim global warming is causing extensive melting of glaciers, icebergs and permafrost, which might lead to drastic increases in sea level and threaten inundation of coastal cities. But there is no evidence that the sea level is actually rising, only forecasts by computer models that have been based on thousands of assumptions.

Photographs of the shore of Greenland show the sea ice surrounding it has been melting. But upon my visit, this reporter was shown evidence that the icecap, where most of the ice is located, is growing significantly.

In Antarctica, temperatures on the icecap are decreasing. Satellite radar surveys of Antarctica and Greenland have shown that the icecaps are getting larger. Reports from the Mohn Sverdrup Center for Global Ocean studies in Norway state that, in the past 11 years, Greenland??s icecap has increased over 21 inches.

A recent paper published in Science claims that ice is being deposited at the net rate of 26.8 billion tons a year in Antarctica.

Greenland, a Danish possession, is the largest island in the world, with an area of 1 million square miles. About 5 percent of the world??s ice sits in a cap that covers its entire interior. Only 200,000 square miles on the coast is not under the cap.

In some places the cap is almost 10,000 feet thick. Greenland??s northern extremity is the closest land to the North Pole. Water from the Arctic Ocean flows southward along the East Coast carrying icebergs from Greenland, which help cool the North Atlantic Ocean.

On my recent visit to Scoresbysund, about halfway up the eastern coast of Greenland, I had an opportunity to observe glaciers and icebergs first hand in the world??s largest complex of fjords.

A few hours in this region provided a glimpse of life above the Arctic Circle. This municipality, first settled in 1925, contains about 500 people, whose principal occupations are hunting and fishing. It is about the size of Great Britain and is relatively close to the largest national park in the world, encompassing about a third of the icecap.

This reporter saw firsthand how some glaciers near the mouth of Scoresbysund and the open ocean had melted away, leaving beds of stones at the water??s edge.

However, as the ship I was on, the Professor Molchanov, a former Russian Arctic research vessel, sailed deeper into the sound, away from the sea and toward the central icecap, I saw many glaciers that were not melting, and lots of icebergs produced by glaciers, which are clearly growing.

One glacier I saw was said to be six miles wide. One of the largest, I was told, is a 60-mile-wide glacier located some distance away on Greenland.

Inspecting a group of icebergs in a rubber Zodiac boat at close range is awe-inspiring. I saw several bergs that were at least 30 to 50 stories tall. Someone in the group I was traveling with estimated a height of more than 80 yards for one.

As we got close to one of these mammoths I could see its foundation deep under the water. Most of the ice, about 66 percent of the berg, remains submerged as it floats on the surface. These icebergs are part of the Earth??s conveyor system, which is responsible for the movement of air and
ocean currents that influence weather conditions. As the icebergs from the polar regions melt, the cold water they generate travels toward the equator.

In the equatorial regions, heat from the sun is more intense than elsewhere and it produces both currents of warm water and clouds of water vapor, which travel toward the poles. Some of the water vapor is deposited as snow on the ice caps and subsequently turns into ice. The heat released by the conversion of water vapor into liquid water, snow and ice in the polar regions is mostly radiated into outer space. This process creates very low temperatures in the icecaps. For example, ??94 degrees Fahrenheit has been found in Greenland.

Despite what has been reported in the mainstream press, many scientists do not subscribe to the theory of global warming and believe that, overall, objective science is showing that the Earth is cooling, not warming.

The Physics of Glaciers, now in its second edition, by retired Canadian scientist Dr. W.S.B. Patterson, discloses that the maximum temperatures of the Holocene, the epoch in which we live, occurred about 5,000 years ago and that the Earth has been cooling since then.

Of course, superimposed on this long-term trend are shorter-term fluctuations in temperature. For example, in A.D. 1000 it was warmer than it is now and Northern Europe had a ??Golden Age? when Vikings farmed Greenland.

However, Nordic settlements quickly disappeared when the Earth cooled from about A.D. 1300 to 1700, in what has been known as ??the Little Ice Age,? an historical fact. Man??s actions did not cause this. It was Mother Nature??s work.

Subsequently, the Earth has been warming for the past 300 years. Consequently, it is reasonable to expect some ice to melt after that many years of warming.

However, the fact that temperatures now are lower overall than they were in A.D. 1000 indicates that the long-term trend is still in force. There is no evidence that a mere 300 years of warming has reversed the 4,600-year cooling trend. It is a fact that carbon dioxide increased during the last 100 years as a result of the industrial revolution and increasing population. But what caused temperatures to rise during the first 200 years? Many scientists argue that it was Mother Nature at work again.

The available data do not support the contention that the minuscule increase in carbon dioxide concentration??from 0.03 percent to 0.04 percent of the atmosphere??has significantly affected Earth??s temperatures.

On the other hand it is easy to find a close connection between cyclical changes in the radiation supplied by the sun and conditions on the Earth. In fact, Serbian scientist Milutin Milankovic, while incarcerated in a jail cell, provided mathematical support for the theory that variations in the orbits of the Earth, sun and moon were responsible for recurrent ice ages without the aid of a computer.

Nature is highly cyclical: night follows day, winter follows summer, global cooling follows global warming, and glaciations follow interglacial periods. All of these cycles can be explained in terms of movements of the Earth-moon system around the sun.

Dr. Willard Libbey carbon dated material connected with the end of the last glaciation and found that it was 11,000 years old. Other scientists have found that, during the past 20 million years, these periods have never lasted longer than 13,500 years. Therefore it is reasonable to believe that we are coming to the end of our present interglacial period and that sometime, within the next 1,700 years, it is likely the Earth will get much colder and less hospitable.

Don??t think that there are not doomsday scenarios associated with increased cooling. As heat from the sun diminishes during the end of interglacials, the increasing mass of the growing icecaps stresses the Earth??s crust. According to one theory, this increases volcanic activity.

About 80 percent of Earth??s volcanoes are underwater. When they erupt ocean temperatures will likely increase. Then air temperatures will increase and temperate zone glaciers will melt. Sea ice and ice on coastal areas will melt.

Evaporation will increase in the tropics, and more water vapor will travel to the poles, where it will deposit as snow. When this volcanic action diminishes, as the crust adjusts, the Earth will cool faster, and the probability of glaciation will likely increase.

Perhaps people should be grateful for the present warmth, disregard the politically modified science promoted by the global warmers, and pray that the warmth continues. Conditions in the Arctic leave a great deal to be desired, in my experience.

Raiden
01-15-2006, 08:37 PM
The pentagon theory is interesting. The WTC isnt. what is this video trying to tell us? Our government did this or what? Sounds like this guy is anti american and bush. He mentioned numerous buildings that have burnt for hours and never fallen yet the WTC was burning for less than an hour and fell. HELLO! the god damn building was hit by a 747 with a full tank of gas going over 500 mph. The speed of impact itself is going to cause alot of damage. Thats why the buildings fell so quickly. THey werent just on fire they were hit by a massive moving bomb flown by people.

The power of this explosion is so mind bogeling that it is hard to tell why some odd things happended on different floors of the building.

Our govt. didnt plan this. If other explosions were planned it certainly wasnt by us, it was by terrorists.

This guy is like micheal moore. I think he is just taking facts and turning it into a video to make a scene about the US.


Well whatever you think it sure was convenient as an excuse for Bush and his far right loony colleagues to whip up the American tendency for nationalism and xenophobia (which is bred out of paranoia and fear), and go prancing round whatever country they wanted in the world doing whatever they want. I suppose you think it is complete coincidence that nearly half the world remaining oil is in Iraq and there were no WMDs found there? There are a hell of a lot more nasty people in the world than saddam but he doesn't do sweet FA about any of them. Pakistan is Americas buddy now but you get your head cut off there if you criticise the Koran.

This has nothing to do with being anti american but Bush and his collegaues really are a bunch of deranged psycopaths and those redneck hillbillies who think it is anti-american to point this out when infact Bush is dragging your country down into the gutter and you will be no better than those nutcases like the one in Iran whos can now justify to his people why they need to start making nukes. You would have to be more than naive not to see this, you would have to be downright stupid

mfactor420
01-15-2006, 08:46 PM
okay, they aren't connected, other than what the subjects they discuss...there are many many many people out there talking about this that have never heard of alex jones...

i was just pointing it out that the video was mislabeled...

Hey, I was just joking with you. :thumbsup: :D

Personally, I believe your version not lordbushit's version.

mfactor420
01-15-2006, 08:53 PM
the WTC was burning for less than an hour and fell. HELLO! the god damn building was hit by a 747 with a full tank of gas going over 500 mph.

This is the quote I am talking about. I don't recall the WTC being hit by any "747". Where'd you get this info Smokey McPot? No wonder no one can discern the truth. It can't even be repeated accurately. :(

nicholasstanko
01-15-2006, 10:14 PM
The pentagon theory is interesting. The WTC isnt. what is this video trying to tell us? Our government did this or what? Sounds like this guy is anti american and bush.

Freedom of speech and free thinking is anti-american?

He mentioned numerous buildings that have burnt for hours and never fallen yet the WTC was burning for less than an hour and fell. HELLO! the god damn building was hit by a 747 with a full tank of gas going over 500 mph. The speed of impact itself is going to cause alot of damage. Thats why the buildings fell so quickly.

That doesnt really make a good arguement. The buildings fell within five minutes of each other. And also, the planes impacted on the upper floors...how then does a building fall vertically straight down if it didnt even bend or sway after impact.

I dont know what you were doing at the time of impact, but the building looked pretty rock-solid to me.


THey werent just on fire they were hit by a massive moving bomb flown by people.

Question. Were you paying attention? it was explained that even at peak temperature, there wasn't enough of it to melt the steel and cause a complete building collapse.

let's say that i have a vacuum cleaner that can hold five pounds of dirt. There's enough dirt on my floor to make up six pounds...according to your logic, it shouldnt matter what limitations there are on dirt-cleaning because vacuums suck up dirt...and extreme temperatures can melt steel.

it's okay if you cant make the connection. psycho's been a thorn in my side on this issue for quite some time now.

The power of this explosion is so mind bogeling that it is hard to tell why some odd things happended on different floors of the building.

okay. The laws of physics and gravity were also acting oddly on that day... perfect reasoning. it explains why jet fuel which is nothing more than kerosene, melted steel that could withstand the peak temperature of steel.

But i have an idea. what probably happened was that the impact was so great when the planes hit, that Chronos, Master of all Space and Time was caught off-guard and had to reboot his universal computer.

Our govt. didnt plan this. If other explosions were planned it certainly wasnt by us, it was by terrorists.

Wow! a double conspiracy. It makes even more sense to assume that the government and terrorists might have carried out attacks on the same day at roughly the same time.

Anything to not have to wake up i see...

This guy is like micheal moore. I think he is just taking facts and turning it into a video to make a scene about the US.

You sound like rush limbaugh. I think you're just taking sound bites and spinning it to make a negative viewpoint about muslims that never posed a threat to you.

Psycho4Bud
01-15-2006, 10:22 PM
You sound like rush limbaugh. I think you're just taking sound bites and spinning it to make a negative viewpoint about muslims that never posed a threat to you.

You conspiracy freaks should get your stories together some time. Someone, of your thought waves, stated that Bush found out of Osama's plan and took over the plot. :rasta:

nicholasstanko
01-15-2006, 10:23 PM
Are you an architect? After witnessing the events in NYC on 9/11 first hand, I met one (architect) in the subway, shortly before the towers fell. He told me what was going to happen: How they were built to implode and collapse straight down, and he was 100% correct.

Hmmm... the documentary i watched on the History Channel (talking about its creation) and Discovery (detailing the events of that day) never mentioned that.

One more thing: Either Bush was involved in the attacks, or he wasn't. If you say that he didn't "handle" the situation correctly ("shameful") when informed of the attacks, then it does not make any sense to insinuate that he knew about, or even ordered, them in the first place. I mean, come on! If he WAS complicit in the attack(s), then what is it you expected from him after they took place? Wouldn't he have devised a better plan of action than the way he appeard in that classroom? Oh yeah, it was all part of the "plot".

Please, if you can, elaborate on what a mass-murderer is supposed to do after his plan is enacted that is NOT "shameful" - other than confess.


Breuk,

Miss Green obviously meant that he should have reacted better to the "surprise" attack, if it were indeed a surprise.

Read more closely next time.

nicholasstanko
01-15-2006, 10:25 PM
this video has nothing to do with alex jones too...it's mislabeled...it's by dylan avery. i don't know if anyone pointed that out.


i noticed that. i hadnt gotten around to it.

scobbie
01-15-2006, 10:33 PM
and a very good job you done to dylan!

nicholasstanko
01-15-2006, 11:23 PM
You conspiracy freaks should get your stories together some time. Someone, of your thought waves, stated that Bush found out of Osama's plan and took over the plot. :rasta:


i never heard of that. it might even be possible. im just willing to bet anything that sep 11 was orchestrated by a VERY powerful group.

eg420ne
01-15-2006, 11:57 PM
You conspiracy freaks should get your stories together some time. Someone, of your thought waves, stated that Bush found out of Osama's plan and took over the plot. :rasta:
Thats a new too me 2...

pisshead
01-16-2006, 08:28 AM
i've heard conflicting things from bootlickers who don't question the feds' official conspiracy theory, and from the feds' themselves too...i guess that means it's not true...