Log in

View Full Version : goverment vs. stoners



flamingskullballs
12-05-2005, 03:11 AM
ok...so i was watching this commercial on how pot is bad...its about this kid whos friends told him to smoke pot, and then they told him to put his fist in his mouth...and he cant get it out blah blah blah...and then hes all "i dont want to follow my friends pressure anymore"

then i came upon an understanding...the goverment is pressuring the children of the nations...they tell them to not smoke pot, and in doing that, you will be a better person...they are pressuring them to not smoke pot, all the time...i see it as a different thing, i am definantly not "cool" because i do drugs...more of an outcast...so then following the crowd is being sober, or stoned...it all depends on your crowd...the goverment tells people to not follow pressure, and doing that only hides the pressure that they are giving them...

they are using our "pressure" to hide their own...and people are believing them...

do us, as stoners, ever give anyone pressure??? well ask em if they wanna smoke, but if they say no, do you really try to make em smoke???

no...i dont think you do...

the real pressure is from the goverment...people should realise this...

maskedpantsman
12-05-2005, 03:13 AM
amen, brotha.
except I'm atheist.
Point taken.
I completely agree.

flamingskullballs
12-05-2005, 03:34 AM
yeah man

Ep180
12-05-2005, 04:03 AM
I saw that, it pissed me off so bad. And the one where the girl is just sitting there and doesnt want to move or anything, just stupid. What was the website for it, I was going to send them an email or something.

http://www.cannabisnews.com/news/thread15998.shtml

flamingskullballs
12-05-2005, 04:12 AM
If weed supports terrorism and pregnant teens smoke weed, then next yearâ??s Super Bowl ad should read "pregnant teens support terrorism."

that is going to be in my sig in a sec.

IntrepidS
12-05-2005, 04:16 AM
Yea I saw that commercial but you only made me realize that point now. I detest most of the things that the U.S. government is doing in the present day.

BoyNamedSue
12-05-2005, 04:19 AM
arent those ads made by private groups, not the government? regardless they go a little overboard.

passit420
12-05-2005, 04:21 AM
the government telling kids not to smoke pot leads them to alcohol because it is legal, they think it is safe. kids are more likely to die because of marijuana prohibition and propaganda for it. i have a new goal for everyone. get one non toker to toke before christmas. dont force them though, and make sure that they are comfortable with it.
try situations were you and a bucn hof other tokers are doing something and just happen to have some weed. tell the person that he can toke if he wants, but he doesnt have to. save some for later and make sure everyone around is having a good time because you are stoned, that way the other one feels like he will have a better time if he does it. again this is not pressuring them to do it directly. i have a feeling this will work well. also if the person might call the cops, dont invite them.

passit420
12-05-2005, 04:22 AM
those ads are made by the govt. http://www.nida.nih.gov/

CrAzYpOtHeAd
12-05-2005, 04:24 AM
Do you think EVERYONE should smoke weed flamingskullballs?

Because if you do then you are very stupid.

passit420
12-05-2005, 04:28 AM
did you ever notice how they only list the harmful effects. biased reports dont go anywhere. it is time for change. let us band together and fight the establishment. we must complete what our hiipy fore fathers started. we must legalize pot. from there we will make usage mandatory, thus resulting in a happier, more mellow populus. what wonders we can achieve with this plant. lol. but what if marijuana use was mandatory or at least reccomended by the govt. that would be pretty cool, like seriously though. stoned all the time, and tokin everywhere.

flamingskullballs
12-05-2005, 04:32 AM
Do you think EVERYONE should smoke weed flamingskullballs?
definantly not!!!

are you crazy man???

some people should be as sober as one can be

passit420
12-05-2005, 04:35 AM
btw i liked that article. anyone see that chappele show where that commercial with the dudes stoned at the drive thru takes a twist and the little girl dies not because the dudes in the car where stoned, but becuase the litttle girl was stoned. it makes me laugh just thinking about it. if chappele hadnt run away, he could easily win presidency. lol. everyone loves him, even my parents, and boy is he clever.

CrAzYpOtHeAd
12-05-2005, 04:36 AM
Yeah, i mean. weed does have it's negative's. But so does everything. nothing on this planet is perfect. But weed is ALOT more safer and healthier than legal things such as cigi's or alcohol

Cigi's lead to cancer and are highly addictive

Alcohol can lead to voilence, car crash's, death's, memory loss, brain damage, liver damage, and can give you such a shity hang over, and alcohol can be very addictive too

Weed, short term memory loss, MENTALLY addicting (so only a certain group of people would be addicted to weed due to thier personality)

and apart from those 2 LITTLE negative's i can think of. the smoke would'nt be good for your lungs but hell, they have vape's!

Weed is lovely. :dance:

flamingskullballs
12-05-2005, 04:42 AM
i like how weed tends to be green

CrAzYpOtHeAd
12-05-2005, 04:43 AM
.......

passit420
12-05-2005, 04:44 AM
my friends and i have been smoking for a year and a half and we have all had our breaks, but we had a craving. not a dependency in any way, we just felt like getting stoned. but, one of my ffirends started smoking cigarettes cuz he found a pack on he street and he cant stop smoking em now. he is always like "i wish i had a cigarette." they dont do anything to him but satisfy his craving. he now buys them off people at high prices cuz he aint 18 and he is always talking about them. whats the point. i mean, the ocassional cigy is respectable, but everyday is ridiculous. o and those stupid pack of cigarettes does the same harm as 1-2 jays is bs cuz cigs have filters, i bet they didnt take that into consideration now did they.

passit420
12-05-2005, 04:47 AM
i think that since running gives "users" a high, it should be banned. all those early moring joggers and track athletes should be written tickets and taken into custody for the heavy "abusers" i heard that they have a message board too. they are banding together against the government.

flamingskullballs
12-05-2005, 04:48 AM
no...

thats why the healthiest way to smoke pot is in a bong, or better yet, a vapouriser...but, i like my joints...so fuck you....

CrAzYpOtHeAd
12-05-2005, 04:55 AM
my friends and i have been smoking for a year and a half and we have all had our breaks, but we had a craving. not a dependency in any way, we just felt like getting stoned. but, one of my ffirends started smoking cigarettes cuz he found a pack on he street and he cant stop smoking em now. he is always like "i wish i had a cigarette." they dont do anything to him but satisfy his craving. he now buys them off people at high prices cuz he aint 18 and he is always talking about them. whats the point. i mean, the ocassional cigy is respectable, but everyday is ridiculous. o and those stupid pack of cigarettes does the same harm as 1-2 jays is bs cuz cigs have filters, i bet they didnt take that into consideration now did they.

Yeah man, you have to be 16 to buy cigi's in england, im 15 so i have to get my dad to buy em for me lol (i know,crazy) but i am highly addicted to cigi's.

about a year ago almost a friend just brought a pack and i thought i would smoke them wih him for "fun", i used to enjoy it and did'nt need em but just felt fun. now i just do it to get rid of the horrible feeling of not having one.

beachguy in thongs
12-05-2005, 04:59 AM
16 male Wistar mature rats were treated daily with cannabis extract (20 mg/kg tetrahydrocannabinol) for 3 mo. After a 1- to 4-mo drug-free period, residual effects on a variety of behaviors were studied and compared with behaviors of 16 matched controls who received a vehicle. No residual effects were found in learning of an 8-arm radial maze task, nor on a differential reinforcement of low-rate responding (DRL-20) task, nor in open field activity. Two-way shuttle box avoidance learning was facilitated by previous cannabis treatment, since cannabis-treated Ss exhibited shorter mean latencies to avoid footshock than controls. Findings indicate greater vulnerability of immature organisms (previous studies) than mature organisms (the present study) to long-term effects of chronic cannabis administration.

http://www.erowid.org/plants/cannabis/references/journal/1985_stiglick_psychopharm_1/1985_stiglick_psychopharm_1_abstract.shtml

flamingskullballs
12-05-2005, 05:01 AM
ebachguy...you are my home boy...

beachguy in thongs
12-05-2005, 05:05 AM
ege, htanks.

flamingskullballs
12-05-2005, 05:07 AM
are you mocking me!?

(in litle schooldirl voice)

Esoteric416
12-05-2005, 05:12 AM
arent those ads made by private groups, not the government? regardless they go a little overboard.
Yes. Goverment subsidised private groups.

beachguy in thongs
12-05-2005, 05:13 AM
There gonna come out with a spray, that you spray under your tongue. A Marijuana spray.

flamingskullballs
12-05-2005, 05:15 AM
as long as it doesnt make me sober ;)

beachguy in thongs
12-05-2005, 05:36 AM
are you mocking me!?

(in litle schooldirl voice)
No, I wouldn't do that. I like my new image of Titan, though, in my avatar. This gives a ground shot.

flamingskullballs
12-05-2005, 05:46 AM
oooohhhhh

amazimg beachguy...amazing

king kong bong
12-05-2005, 03:15 PM
yea all these anti-pot commercials but they have no problem promoting alcohol commercials.