foreskins

[Stoner Shadow Wolf]

anything that might be useful to know? do they make it any les preferable? better? worse? or does it even matter?

[Monkey4Sale]

My wife likes it without. So much easier to take care of, no special cleaning required.

[yocass]

you gotta be one dumb mother fucker to not know how to clean your dick. theres no special shit.. soap it, rinse it, and fuck with it. Most girls seem to be impartial except for the aesthetic factor. In which case it still seems to be pretty evenly split which is preferred.

[Garden Knowm]

you gotta be one dumb mother fucker to not know how to clean your dick. theres no special shit.. soap it, rinse it, and fuck with it. Most girls seem to be impartial except for the aesthetic factor. In which case it still seems to be pretty evenly split which is preferred.



soap it, rinse it, and fuck with it

now that's funny

LOL

[chisme]

yeah everyman is born with info on how to clean his dick.



u know indian's and cowboys used to hold the end of the foreskin closed and piss so the foreskin fills with piss and they thought it cleaned it......i dont know lol cant even remember where that was from.

[420purplehaze420]

u know indian's and cowboys used to hold the end of the foreskin closed and piss so the foreskin fills with piss and they thought it cleaned it.
eww

[Stoner Shadow Wolf]

lol this really isnt helpping... :P

[Jim Morrison]

actually pissing in your foreskin is a fastway to clean it but it can get messy they do it in spain alot i hear

[slipknotpsycho]

upsides to circumscision, not so prone to infection. some people just ignore their shit and the cleaning required to prevent infections therefore they get infections often. from what i hear with your foreskin still intact sex is aobut 10x better, since that skin holds alot of nerves in it....and honestly if sex feels 10x better without it gone...i dunno if i could handle sex not being circumscised. and some girls like it with it, and some with out it...it wouldn't really make a diffrence to them in feeling wise...so it's just a matter of prefrence....

[powair]

I really dont think its true that sex is 10 times better if your uncircumsized, lol.

[beachguy in thongs]

I really dont think its true that sex is 10 times better if your uncircumsized, lol.


What about with a crown, Powair??? :stoned:

[KeanBean]

idk bout 10 times better, but its more pleasurable than a circumcised person

[Reefer Rogue]

I'm pretty sure it's a fact that an uncircumsized male has 50 more nerves in his penis then a circumsized male. I'm i'm wrong then whatever...

[slipknotpsycho]

well i don't know how much better as i have always been circumsized (thank god, i'd have to kill a doctor if he chopped my penis when i was old enough to re member the pain) but i've been told by multiple people that it is 10x better (may be an over exaguration, and it may not) without being circumsized. i know it's a fact that, the skin that is cut off durring this holds a LOT of nerves in it that also contribute to it...also there's the fact that the actual head of the dick doesn't get touched too often if skin is covering it, so when it is touched (the right way that is, i'm sure sandpaper on it wouldn't feel too good) it would feel exceptionally better, where as circumsized the actual nerves in the head of the dick get attention pretty much all day (boxers/breifs whatever rubbing against it all day) just food for thought.

[GSW389]

I'm pretty sure it's a fact that an uncircumsized male has 50 more nerves in his penis then a circumsized male. I'm i'm wrong then whatever...

it wouldnt even matter. think of foreskin as like a third arm. if some people have a third arm and another doesnt, its not like the person without the third arm is missing anything cuz they wouldnt have ever had one.

[Stoner Shadow Wolf]

it wouldnt even matter. think of foreskin as like a third arm. if some people have a third arm and another doesnt, its not like the person without the third arm is missing anything cuz they wouldnt have ever had one.um... but every guy is born with a foreskin... they had it at one point! lol

IMO it's disgusting to remove the foreskin, it's mutalating babies!!! :O

[Breukelen advocaat]

um... but every guy is born with a foreskin... they had it at one point! lol IMO it's disgusting to remove the foreskin, it's mutalating babies!!! :O

One of the main reasons routine infant circumcision became popular in Western Society, among people that did not have a tradition of doing it, was because it was said to reduce masturbation. This was ridiculous, but that's what's been claimed since the 1800's. Circumcision is a big money maker for the doctors, and unnecessary except in very rare cases - such as penile cancer in elderly men.

The insurance companies are also to blame, for paying the doctors' fees.

[slipknotpsycho]

lmfao that's ridiculous, i've known plenty of guys that aren't and on average i masturbate 2 or 3x as much as them >.< i only had it done to my son because it is less prone to infection if it's not taken proper care of (i mean it's not like it needs some super special treament or anything but you do need to roll the skin back and clean when you take a shower, and i'd rather not have that discussion with my son when he gets older)

[yocass]

actually circumsized is more prone to infection... because your tearing open the skin etc.. its instinct to clean yourself, so unless you have less than 2 fingers when born, there is no talk necessary.

[deathbyvalley]

IMO it's disgusting to remove the foreskin, it's mutalating babies!!! :O
to you it might be, but in judaism and islam, they're prescribed rituals.

[yocass]

he said in his opinion...I say the crusades were disgusting and brutal, but hey they were prescribed by christianity.

[Breukelen advocaat]

he said in his opinion...I say the crusades were disgusting and brutal, but hey they were prescribed by christianity.

I'm no fan of christianity, or any other religion, but the middle east and North Africa had sacked europe, and enslaved people ("white slavery") - and they it was felt that crusades were just.

[Breukelen advocaat]

to you it might be, but in judaism and islam, they're prescribed rituals.

That is 100% correct. And so is female circumcisiion in some cultures. Both of these procedures are wrong.

In the U.S., more males (mostly infants) die because of botched circumcision procedures, than from penile cancer or other related medical problems intact men may get.

Just because a kid will have to learn to brush his teeth is no excuse to pull them out, and the same goes for foreskins.

BTW, some Mohels (Jewish professional circumcisionists) actually BITE and chew the foreskin off the babies!

[Breukelen advocaat]

Here's pictures of a bris, where mouth techniques are used. I don't think that he is biting it in this instance - he's mostly just sucking the blood which is called metzitzah b'peh,

http://www.sexuallymutilatedchild.org/mohel.htm

[deathbyvalley]

i know about what goes on at a bris. i'm jewish, and have two younger brothers. i know about female circumcision as well (anthropology classes have taught me well) and while you are entitled to your opinion, just because it's your opinion doesn't make it wrong. in some cultures it's done as a religious practice, or for asthetic reasons. people from other cultures can come see what you're doing and think it's disgusting even though it's normal to you.