911 set up?

[ak40haze]

dude have you seen the slowed down footage of the "plane" and the other thing that shot somthing into the buinding? compare the two impact blast /smoke clouds wild :confused: :eek: :mad:

www.911uncovered.com
www.911evidence.com

[king cola]

there is a conspiracy to why the grass is green probably, a conspiracy is made about evrything, some more believable than ohters, this, inmy view, seems a bit far fetched.

[NowhereMan]

all my teachers were out to get me in school too
but a few got fooled into thinking i give a shit about things like shakespear and geometry....i did graduate
so you see
dig deep enough and im sure you will see
the world itself is out to kill you
mother nature is a bitch
and they are people
who want you dead for reasons you cant imagine


now,what ya trying to say,it was FAKED ,?

you aint one them they let it happen to types are ya?
i mean,,,,nobody would let that go on ,
take a IDIOT to believe that Any AMERICAN would let somebody do that to people on them planes alone , to those in them towers.dam man think about what that was.

a true fucking idiot to think any prez no matter how dickheaded he is would let that go on,or be in on it,this,,,,they let it happen,,they helped, ect bullshit dont settle well with me,i find it disturbing that people are so anti\ANTI-goverment -state-social.they jump on shit like that.
not saying anyone did anything right is one thing
accusing of murder is another.

peace

salem witch trials comes to mind

[WeeeeeBong]

I am inclined to believe that too NWM.I do not think that the prez and co. LET it happen knowing it was going to happen.That would be so outrageous.

On the other hand I do not believe that they did all they could to prevent such an attack.

not saying anyone did anything right is one thing
accusing of murder is another.

I agree,unfortunately their short-sightedness led to the murder of 3000 people.I'd have to fire them all.
I mean it was no secret that terrorist hi-jack airplanes.It was no secret that terrorists are willing to blow themselves up for their cause.It was no secret that the terrorists wanted our trade towers for a long time.It is no secret that the terrorists hate capitalism and America.

You know and I know, that still today,the feds spend billions and billions of tax payer dollars every year tracking down and investigatiing mom n pop grow ops.In fact the week after 9/11 the dea was swarming a med pot operation in California.Yeah,I know,thats their job.
The war on drugs takes up way to much of our resources and all for nothing.

Now the real war IS against terrorism imho.WE certainly need to make sure attacks like 9/11 never happen again.That is no small task and yet we as a nation seem to think we have an infinite amount of resources to catch these terrorists types and at the same time we fund the drug warrior's folly to conduct war on our own people.
The NO.1 enemy of this country,the US, and the rest of the world is terrorism,not pot growers and users.
Every dime we spend on the persecution of cannabis could better be used to secure ourselves against future attacks.We need to pool all our resources into fighting a REAL enemy,the terrorists.
Of course the powers that be atm would be more happy to connect terrorism and cannabis together so they can 'kill 2 birds with 1 war'.

You've heard how drugs help finance the terrorists.In reality it is not the drugs themselves but prohibition.

i find it disturbing that people are so anti\ANTI-goverment -state-social.they jump on shit like that.

I find it disturbing as well.I'm asking myself all the time why people think like this.The only answer besides what you said... idiots...is that people are fast losing trust in their goverment and looking for the truth.They want to see some accountability.

When a governement lies so blatantly and consistantly then conspircacy theories are born faster than cockroaches.
A pebble was tossed a few decades back and tho the feds have done everything they could to stop it's ripple they have failed.The spirit of freedom moves across this country and is awakening many many people.

I like to keep a positive attitude about it myself.Throughout history tyrants are always defeated.They have their time in the sun unforunately but they are always toppled.

God Bless America.Freedom will reign again.

[ak40haze]

Sorry i didnt mean to come off aff anti gov./country or what ever ...nore did i say that conspiracy word that pops up when ever people ask questions about gov. envolvment.I have read some crazy , but true facts that deserve answers and none were asked with that 911 commition.

first let me ask you this ...do you think that the media can be used to change public opinion? even thought ? how about change history as you know it?

if i asked you how was the damage to the federal building in oklahoma caused you would say it was a lone nut in a ryder truck right.....

right click and szve and listen

http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/RANCHO/POLITICS/OK/cnn041995.mp3



I heard that there were no "terrorist" on the flight list so i looked into this


to began with American Airlines, Flight 11. This was the plane that crashed into the north tower of the World Trade Center. I began with the list of passengers. This was not difficult. The passenger lists for all four planes are posted on CNN's Website.

Click on the link. This is a long link for the formatting of my newsletter. If it is broken on your screen, you will have to paste it into your Web browser's address box. This will take two steps.

http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2001/trade.center/victims/AA11.victims.html

The CNN page says that there were 92 people on board. I suggest that you print out the list. Part of my exercise was to count the names of the passengers. Besides, you never know when a Web page will disappear.

Do you have the print-out in front of you? Count the names. I get 86 names, including the crew. But the CNN page says 92 people were on board.

None of the 86 names is an Arab name. This is very, very strange. First, how did the CNN list-compiler know that there were 92 people on board? Five of them are not listed. Second, how did anyone get on board who was not on the list of ticketed passengers?

To get onto the flight legally, each passenger had to have a ticket with his or her name on it. Each passenger had to present a photo ID to the check-in agent. The check-in agent was supposed to look at the picture and the person, and then make a judgment. Was it the same person? If the mandated procedure was followed, the check-in agent decided that the ticket's name, the photo ID's name, the photo, and the ID-holder's face all matched. If there was any doubt, the check-in agent was supposed to ask for some other form of identification. If there was none, the person was not allowed to board the plane.

We are told by the United States government that five Arabs somehow got through this initial screening procedure. How did they do this? This is puzzle number one regarding Flight 11. Puzzle number two has to do with the incomplete passenger list.

Airlines keep a list of passengers on board. This is for insurance purposes, should there be a crash. It is also for the purpose of notifying relatives after a crash. It is also for the purpose of in-cabin screening. "Has everyone paid who is on the plane?" And, finally, is there a hijacker on board?

On American Airlines Flight 11, there were no Arab names on the passenger list. So, how does the government know who the hijackers were?

Why does CNN's Web page list 92 dead, when there are only 86 name listed? Who was the non-Arab?

I have seen nothing about government accusations against American Airlines for substandard check-in security procedures. In fact, I have seen nothing about the discrepancy between the published names and the published numbers regarding how many people were on board.

Let's go to American Airlines Flight 77. This plane crashed into the Pentagon.

http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2001/trade.center/victims/AA77.victims.html

We are told that 64 people were on board. I count 56, including 6 crew members. There is no explanation offered for the absence of 8 names. There is no Arab name on this list.

Something is definitely wrong here.

What about United Airlines? Did the company's employees follow the same check-in procedure? Presumably, they did. I checked Flight 175, which crashed into the south tower.

http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2001/trade.center/victims/ua175.victims.html

There were 56 people on board, according to CNN's summation. I printed out the list. I counted the names. Once again, they don't add up. The summation says there were 2 pilots, 7 flight attendants, and 56 passengers. I counted the names. The total is 56 -- the number attributed to the passengers. Nine names are missing. None of the listed names is Arab.

This leaves United Flight 93, which crashed in Pennsylvania. It had 45 people on board, according to the summation.

http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2001/trade.center/victims/ua93.victims.html

Again, there is a discrepancy. Only 33 names appear on the list. A dozen names are missing. Among the missing names are the four Arabs who allegedly hijacked the plane.

So, the published names in no instance match the total listed for the number of people on board. CNN really should offer an explanation for this discrepancy.

In no case does an Arab name appear on a list, let alone one of the alleged hijackers.

How did CNN fail to count the names accurately? Did the airlines not provide the full list of each flight's names? Perhaps so.

This raises the next question. How did the airlines know how many people were on each of these flights? The airlines must have had a list for each flight. What possible reason could they have had for not releasing the full lists? Finally, why are there no Arabs listed on any of these lists, let alone the specific Arabs identified by the Attorney General and the head of the FBI in an Associated Press story?

I do not understand how 19 Arabs could have evaded the check-in procedures. I also do not understand why every passenger's name is not on the published lists.

I have seen no other source of the passenger lists. (Another search word: "manifests.") It has now been over a month since the attack. Where is a complete list? I don't know. Where is a complete list of all four flights that has the alleged hijackers' names on it? I don't know.

Finally, where is some enterprising reporter who is trying to get answers? I don't know.

and i read at least 7 of the suspected hijackers are still alive (or were at the time)

here is a list of articles that pose a few questions that might get more attention after Fahrenheit 911 comes out

http://www.prisonplanet.com/911.html

[HvyFuel]

I'm starting to see posts like this popping up everywhere.

My first response is 'no they wouldn't dare fake a terrorist attack'. Now I'm a cynic of the first degree but killing your own people so you can start a war is too extreme a thought even for me. But people keep raising what seem to be perfectly valid arguments and nobody in authority is answering them.

I have no doubt that GW is corrupt but this can't be true. Can it?

hmmm :confused:

[akwg]

i think they woulda done something if they could or if they even knew somthing like tat was gonna happen